To be frank, it doesn’t concern me whether a “Republican” or “Democrat” get into the Whitehouse – not that Trump is a Republican not Hillary stands for any Democrat values I can see. I’d like to say as a British Citizen that the emails aren’t important – but as the US and UK share secrets – UK lives are potentially being put at risk by her reckless handling of the emails.
However, my real interest is very parochial. I have seen the Democrat establishment ride roughshod over the law: an almost complete falure to investigate those fabricating climate data, the re-writing the US constitution and generally the protection of the guilty and attacks to the innocent in Climate.
The result is that every single surface data record in the world is corrupt, and even the RSS satellite data has recently started “upjusting” the data. If they haven’t already found a way to do it, sometime soon UAH will go and we will have no way to know what is really happening to the climate.
It was corrupt before they started admitting the pause, it was corrupt when they admitted the pause and it is now corrupt as they further upjust the data to get rid of the pause.
But, this data, not only underpins a flawed energy policy, it also underpins a flawed industrial, economic and world view. It says that industry and industrial output is bad. And it says so, not because they produce CO2, instead even if industry could stop using fossil fuels completely, it would still be bad … for the zealots, industry is bad full stop and the “evil” of CO2 is merely a way to “Prove” it.
This anti-industry, anti-people, anti-common sense environmentalism, is a world view akin to a religion. And like a religion, once it has caught hold in the public mind, it is extremely resistant to mere contrary facts.
And it is a wordview/religion that is noteworthy for who gains and how loses. The “west” loses. Our economies are slowly being strangled by wind … “power”. And Who gains as we go about this orgy of destruction of our economies on the altar of environmentalism? China! Whose economy has benefited hugely as our environ-mentalists put up energy prices thereby shutting down our industry and sending it to China. China benefits from our stupid obsession with environmentalism. So, it beggars belief that China has not noticed, and that they are not giving it a helping hand! We know that Russia was funding Greenpeace (or was it the other one?)
Likewise, the Saudis and similar oil states, benefited as the public were led to believe that oil prices were on a steady increase because “we had to pay … for the sin of using fossil fuel”. What none of those want to increase fossil fuel prices ever discussed was who benefited from higher fossil fuel prices!
Then, along came US fracking. Suddenly, rather than the Saudis controlling the oil price, the scale of US production undermined them and led to plummeting oil prices. So, what was their response? To fund anti-fracking groups (unlike the Chinese link where’s it’s an educated hunch – the Saudi link is well established).
So, when I look at the bribes the Clinton Foundation gets through its “speaking program” and I see the kind of government Clinton would have, and I recollect the accounts of the Saudis paying money to anti-fracking groups – it’s easy to see who the Clintons will be allowing in to determine US energy policy – and why.
There is no way the Clintons will allow an investigation into NOAA or anyone else fabricating climate data to proceed. And in the US system, the president can and does block such investigations. Because although the Senate can demand evidence from NOAA – there is absolutely no power to enforce that except through the office of the president.
But at least in the US there is some transparency to these dealings. If it goes on in the US, it certainly goes on in the EU. But unlike the US, where those running the show have to subject themselves to public scrutiny every few years, where Senate can at least demand information – even if it can’t force anyone to supply it, in the EU – there is no scrutiny at all. So, all we can really say, is that whatever we see in the US, probably happens to a greater extent behind the closed doors of the EU.
We can say that the EU, like the Democrats is vitriolically anti-CO2 and through it anti-industry and engineering. So, it is reasonably to suppose that the same lobbyists controlling the US also have control over the EU. And whilst Britain is leaving the EU, even outside, the power and influence of these lobbyists will be such that they will continue to influence UK energy and industrial policy to the detriment of us all.
So, the only way to undermine them in Europe, is to undermine them in the US, and the only way to undermine in the US, is to get an administration in the US that will at least allow the proper investigation of the fraudulent behaviour at NASA and NOAA.
Here is how I see it going:
- Trump is elected US president. He is then asked to enforce the subpoena against NOAA – who are then forced to reveal embarrassing emails showing that they intentionally changed the way they compiled surface data temperature in order to “bust the pause”.
- This shows an intention to alter data to mislead the public. As such the enquiry then is able to open up to include others like NASA.
- NASA – employing a 6x arrested eco-activist is going to be one enormous can of worms. It will undoubtedly be far worse than NOAA and show an intention to “upjust” the data and other fraudulent activities as well as an intentionally reckless attitude to the the quality of station data (what Anthony Watts has been saying through his project).
- By the time NASA and NOAA have been re-investigated, the public will know that not only is the pause real, but that most of the warming is not. They will know that the predictions of future warming are utter failures and that those compiling the data and predictions are about as trustworthy as a Clinton.
- Alongside, we will no doubt see investigations into the US EPA, to determine why it is been ignoring the US constitution. This will support the general perception of environ-mentalists as “getting into every part of government” and being a quack pseudo-religious & political cult which has no respect for science or the law.
This will fundamentally change the public perception not just of global warming, not just of the credibility of the “science”, but of environmentalism in general. It will for example, allow people to look at regular flooding we are now getting as once regularly dredged rivers over-top their banks and say: “we don’t trust all your assertions that it’s ‘global warming wot done it'”
These are the concrete changes that should occur if Trump is elected. In short, it will pop the bubble of invulnerability from investigation and prosecution that has developed under Obama and will continue with vengeance under Clinton. It will highlight the lack of factual base to the predictions and show these cannot be trusted. And it will tend to disfavour the alarmists and favour pragmatists which in turn will tend to focus on the real economic damage and ignore the mythical.
And whilst it may not be the most spectacular collapse – being akin to slow decay into nothingness – it will bring down the greatest fraud in all history.
