I saw a video the other day in which Trump tells a story of Clinton bumping into Trump and saying pardon me:

There’s an email somewhere where Clinton says something to the effect “we better beat Trump or all our heads are in the noose”. I think there is now very little doubt that if Clinton loses, there will be immediate investigations into her. At least one person has gone to jail for far lesser crimes regarding emails than she did. The Clinton foundation is one giant scheme to funnel public money for favours to the Clintons. Bill Clinton has four charges of rape his has to answer (but only obviously if the president is Trump … because Clinton can effectively control any investigation and veto any prosecution).
There are also allegations of executions by the Clintons or those closely associated with them. We’ve already seen the head of Clinton Foundation heading for Russia for asylum. Whether that is because he sees the writing on the wall for the Clinton administration and wants to avoid being prosecuted, or he knows his life will be terminated because he knows too much … or both, I can’t say.
The internet is now boiling with anti-Hillary anger and unless vast numbers of the US voters have no access to the internet, I cannot see Hillary winning.
Why then, if we listen to the likes of the BBC in the UK, do we get the impression of a normal campaign, with no allegations of criminality by Hillary and the impression she is going to win by a landslide? The answer is simple: the “Mainstream” US press are as corrupt as the Clintons. Yesterday I saw a video showing a press conference in which the Clinton minder handed out questions to the journalists – they asked them – then when someone asked an unscripted question the press conference ended.

Is this new?

(From my years monitoring climate coverage I’d say) US politics and mainstream media are about as corrupt as its possible to be. What intrigues me is the question of whether this is a new phenomenon – that has recently been exposed – or is it an old phenomenon that has been going on for decades, even centuries, which is only now being exposed through the internet. I strongly suspect, given the corruption of the press, that this is just the established practice and procedure of US politics and that those involved have always known the system is corrupt. But they’ve also known that if they ever exposed the corrupt system, they would be out of work or their paper would be closed down.
So, no doubt the few honest ones look with envy at the freedom of the internet. Indeed, what may be driving the internet stories are insiders fed up with the corrupt system in which they live, finally using the freedom of the internet to vent their frustration.

… they all fall down

But as we know, it is not just the Clintons and those immediately surrounding them that are corrupt. We know NASA and NOAA have been above the law, able to fabricate temperature data to support the corrupt policy of the Whitehouse (driven by outside funders?). No doubt, after dealing with the Clintons & perhaps those like the FBI that sheltered their criminality, the next level of investigations will encompass NOAA and NASA.
I know NOAA and NASA are corrupt, but that is because I’ve spent over a decade carefully monitoring the crap they produce and I know that only a corrupt organisation could produce what they do. But how many other organs of government are there? How many of these have been similarly “upjusting” the figures to Whitehouse policy. If I’m anticipating a number of arrests in NOAA and NASA – how many other departments have similar corruption that will result in similar arrests? What I know will only be the tip of the ice-berg, and if that ice-berg is fully exposed, I know that even knowing there will be far more than I imagine, I am still going to be surprised.

Republicans and Democrats … the all fall down

A system doesn’t get this corrupt without tacit acquiescence from politicians. The media don’t act like a Big Brother propaganda machine – if they know in a few years time their corruption will be exposed by the next party. It therefore seems highly likely to me that this corruption in the US political system goes across all parties. In other words, there will be key people in all parties with their hands in the government kitty – taking money from outsiders to change policy to suit them – and just generally abusing the system to enrich themselves.
Indeed, it is not impossible that the level of corruption is greater in the Republicans. In Hillary Clinton falls, then Bill Clinton goes. If they go, Heads will roll at the FBI and others charged with investigating them who did not investigate them properly. The Clinton Foundation already looks to be going … but presumably all those who gave bribes to the Clintons will similarly face investigation. Then we have all the lower level officials like NASA NOAA and surely eventually the investigation will turn its light on the politicians.
I’m not suggesting all politicians are corrupt – but as the MPs expenses in the UK showed, some certainly are and there’s no distinction of party. So, if Clinton goes, there are many Republicans who will also be shaking in their boots.

And if Clinton wins

Soros will get a huge payout for helping the Clintons with his voting machines.
https://youtu.be/FhdRr3oFcrA
Trump will never see a US government contract – will have the full weight of every investigative agency levelled at him and will be generally hounded out of the US (to Scotland?? Argh!). The sycophantic press will be granted exclusive rights over any US news (what’s new?). There will be a green light to “upjusting” data of all kinds. Bribery and corruption will become endemic (what’s new).
But  most importantly of all … the Clintons will try to destroy the internet freedom which nearly brought them and all the “ring a roses” down. Just as Google now gives prominence to any “official” source, so that e.g. articles on WUWT appear around page 30 of any search unless it specifically mentions WUWT, so this control over what we read and see will be rolled out by various means to all internet channels.
Fortunately, I think the internet is far more robust than they imagine – like wacky-mole – they’ll stamp down on one place, only to have internet freedom appear elsewhere – because the internet cannot be controlled like the press to be a mouthpiece of the Whitehouse. However … there are ways of massively corrupting what we read and Google is a prime example.
So this presidential race is far more important than just who governs the US. Because in a real sense it will determine what freedoms the whole world shares in the future. If Trump wins – the forces that want to repress internet freedoms will be too busy staying out of jail to plan more attacks on our freedom. But if Clinton wins ….. BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

In my last post I listed all the allegations against Hillary Clinton. But because I’m aware that I’ve been receiving an overwhelming (100%) predominance of pro-Trump (or is that anti-Clinton) tweets, I thought I should try to seek out the Democrats on twitter and find what they were saying.
Well I’m now getting pretty pissed off! Not by democrats – but by pro-Trump supporters – not because what they are saying but because there are just so many tweets pro-Trump that I’m struggling to find any real person who supports Clinton.
I did at one time think, I’d found one, when I saw a link to a video. But then having watching an appalling “as a women you should vote for Hillary because she’s a woman” video (which no juicy allegations against Trump – what a waste of time that was) … I spotted a whole host of the same tweets at the same time from a number of different accounts. So, far from being a real person, it was just a series of Bots.
That is not to say there isn’t the occasional democrat, however they are almost invariably just clicking on some link on some obsessively pro-Clinton journalist.  There’s no thought in the tweet  – so I can’t say what the people think themselves.
This effect – the overwhelming swing to one side was exactly what we saw at #brexit – indeed if I’m honest it’s also what we saw before the SNP victory. One side is totally demoralised – it stops tweeting and we then see twitter dominated by one side, with a very few tweeters – clearly either party hacks or paid workers – valiantly trying to be heard amongst the deafening roar for the other side.
I’ve even opened up a private window and viewed the hashtags from that in case twitter was filtering out pro-Trump tweets for me. But apparently not.
The only note of caution I’d add, is that the twitter userbase in the US may be different – so perhaps it is inherently dominated by Trump supporters, so the number may not reflect the general population. Also, I’ve not been monitoring the debate – so unlike #brexit where I could see the change, I come to the US election as a “snapshot” which means I cannot see the trend.
Note I’ve tried #democrat #democrats #hillaryclinton @hillaryclinton #clinton2016 (or perhaps #hillary2016)

Not being from the US, I’ve been coming across a bombardment of allegations against Hillary Clinton, many of which appear so serious that it just beggars belief that she is not in jail let alone was never investigated and there are just so many I cannot comprehend the scale and breadth.
But when I came across this video

listing “21 reasons why so many people hate Hilary Clinton”, I took the opportunity to list the allegations and try and make sense as to which are serious and compelling and which may be just Republican mischief making:

1. There is strong evidence she has some form of illness causing her to stumble, have spasms & uncontrolled movements. She is also described as forgetful by people working for her. There’s clearly some form of illness – at her age that is not unexpected, and the illness may not exclude her from office, but the US people ought to know about it and lying about having the illness does in my view exclude her from office.
2. Several people who have worked with her testify that she is cold and lacks empathy with other people – again not a crime – but from the viewpoint of those outside the US these are not the attributes we want in someone with their finger on the nuclear button who could blow up half the globe.
3. Email Liar – there is clear public testimony that she knowingly lied about her email server which had the emails deleted. When she knew it was criminal to do so. I don’t think there is any question she committed a crime in this instance.
4. She also had high security information on a very insecure server (so insecure the emails have found their way to wikileaks). As I understand it, not securing highly secret information like this is also illegal under US law.
5. I read somewhere from what I remember was a credible source, that when Wikileaks started to release emails Hilary asked to “drone” Julian Assange. This is illegal under US law and she would have known it. It also smacks of a trigger happy person who has no regard for law and order.
6. Bill Clinton raped four women – obviously that crime was committed by her husband and he is the one who should be investigated. Those  in themselves do not exclude her from office (except for the bad choice of having a rotten husband) – but the fact she threatened the rape victims to keep them silent does.
7. (This is new to me) Vince foster was “mysteriously suicided“, office plundered and files destroyed, then ended up with carpet follicles on him, placed by a river with the blood going upwards. I don’t know what links them to the Clintons … but it needs a proper investigation. And there are more allegations of murders: “A lot of it might not be true, but how many freak accidents associated with the Clintons and working against the Clintons can we have until someone starts to wonder … mysteriously chopped up in dumpsters“. I admit US politics is dirty – and perhaps allegations like this are commonplace. But I have to mention that the head of the Clinton Foundation (who presumably could testify against Clinton) has sought political asylum in Russia apparently in fear of his life. This suggests that people close to the Clintons know their life is at risk.
8. The Clinton foundation. There are whole videos just on the corruption. The most credible allegations involve payments to the foundation for contracts in Haiti and the the way very little money donated to Haiti through the foundation got to Haitians (as recounted by the ex president of Haiti). Another very specific allegation is the way Clinton’s brother ended up with a plush job in one of those given a lucrative contract.
9. Benghazi – she was responsible for an initial press release blaming a video and slow to acknowledge it was a terrorist attack “they [republicans] blame Clinton for being among those who misled the public ‘rather than tell the American people the truth and increase the risk of losing an election.'”. There does not appear to be a criminal act here.
10. George Soros (his name keeps coming up – but I do not know why)
11. Destabilising middle east then arming ISIS. (Sounds like it is difficult to pin on her personally)
12. Taking money from sexist Saudis and other dictators with appalling human rights and then falsely claiming to be fighting for women. This is important because she herself is making a huge thing about being a woman. She can’t support regimes that treat women like dirt and then claim to be on the side of women (unless she’s a sexist, racist Xenophobe).
13. Claims she is named after Sir Edmund Hilary who climbed Everest – even though she was born several years before the event. There appears to be an excuse about reading the name in a bee-keeping magazine. It doesn’t sound credible.
14. Lying about landing in Bosnia under fire “where the welcoming ceremony had to be moved inside because of sniper fire” – video shows her speaking to girls on the Tarmac. What makes this so poignant is the remarks were made in Waco (A place in US where there had been a massacre)
15. Election rigging – there is repeated allegations that electronic machines change Republican votes to Democrat. It’s not clear what involvement Hillary has nor what scale or change of result this caused. It is very concerning it can happen – and if there is evidence it is still happening – no matter the scale – then the election should be declared void and retaken in those states using electronic machines.

On the Email scandal, I searched for the Democrat “response” and found very little at all defending her action. Eventually I found a video so banal and obtuse in that it did not at all addressing the serious points that I searched again and found this (which compares the same video with another to show the blatant lies and serious criminal activity):

In particular, the statement that she used multiple devices is highly damning as is the fact that they intentionally wiped the system clean so that it was no possible to forensically recover the emails that had been deleted.
Given her consistent lies, it is almost certain she illegally wiped emails which would themselves have been evidence of criminal activity. Or to put it another way, she intentionally removed all the evidence she could have used to prove she was not a criminal fraud who should be in jail.

For anyone who has children in Scotland or has family or friends with children in Scotland this video will make your stomach churn knowing that it could so easily happen to any honest person.
I watched it all the way through, and I’ve never felt so uncomfortable knowing that the people accused of such corruption could so easily do the same to me and my family.
However, like Brian & Janice Docherty I would speak out in exactly the same way and expect the justice system, social workers and courts to behave with integrity and bring those who are actually breaking the law in the various agencies to justice.
Yes as a sceptic, I always consider the possibility that the testimony I see is untrue. Indeed the scale of the allegations are so enormous it beggars belief that it could happen. However, if these people are telling lies, then they need an Oscar for their performance because they are the best actors I’ve seen. So, is the story credible? I have never seen something like this, but I too have seen police corruption – using threats of “bringing in social services” to try to threaten individuals. So it does ring true.
Therefore it appears to be two ordinary people who appear to have acted entirely properly. Their only “crime” was to report a person who offered a large sum of money for access to their child. They reported it – just as I would have done – but instead of investigating the potential paedophile, it appears that the alleged paedophile was friendly with a “viscount”  who in turn was friendly with the police and in turn the social workers and as a result, these agencies in NE Scotland colluded, to turn a simple report of a potential paedophile and what would presumably have been a relatively simple investigation – possibly with no outcome – into a massive internationalist affair with police monitoring – insinuations of more and more corruption – a complete failure of the legal profession in Ireland to help and what amounts to full blown harassment and criminal conspiracy against the couple by numerous agencies.
Reports were fabricated by people who had never met them – they were kept under observation (apparently by anti-terrorist units). Children were seized forcibly with no paper work. Procedures were not followed and at no time does it appear there was any accusation except that they had made the original complaint – and then as the harassment continued, they properly reported each case of harassment.
It is just mind boggling that it could happen.
And to sum it all up – there were attempts to prevent the couple discussing the case or letting anyone know what had happened.
PLEASE Watch the video and make up your own mind .
https://youtu.be/k4J4KGHS0Rg

Addendum

I’ve spent a few hours this morning trying to find “the other side” of this case. The best I could find was a “devil’s advocate” comment on this blog: https://catholictruthblog.com/2016/01/11/state-vs-parents-scots-father-fights-to-protect-family-against-authorities-in-scotland-and-ireland/
I’ve taken out the parts of the comment that seem most relevant:

Continue reading →

Early this year I was confidently saying: “Prediction: Strong La Nina“. Then in late September as NOAA called off their “La Nina watch” I was beginning to think I might have to change my views.
Of course, as La Nina conditions tends to make hurricanes more likely, I can’t help noting that on 2nd September the US had Hurricane Hermine – and how convenient it was for NOAA to say “it wasn’t due to La Nina conditions” in an election year.
And let’s be blunt – NOAA and NASA now have form for changing data to fabricate the trends they want – so why not fabricate an ENSO trend just for the election?? (At least until the election)
Now, however, I note NOAA have again had to admit that conditions are moving toward La Nina which following a strong El Nino, suggests this La Nina will be stronger and/or longer than “normal”.
What does this mean for UK?

In summary given the ENSO situation coupled with our historical data a mixed winter looks likely with a range of weather possible. That may seem like a bit of a ‘easy way out’ in forecasting terms but given the current guidance there isn’t a lot to go on. Our data at least points to January as being the most likely month for cold weather but it is entirely possible late December may prove cold as well. Equally December could prove a milder and more unsettled month with February perhaps turning out drier with a mixture of warm and cold temperatures. As ever there are many days and weeks before winter starts and we’ll be updating on the run in once more data becomes available or indeed more clear.

For a full description CW Weather (Note this was written when NOAA had dismissed another La Nina)
Also, based on my own analysis and similar changes to the Atlantic East coast as Pacific, there is a potential (but not prediction) for higher precipitation than normal.
However the forecast for summer 2017 is not good because La Nina conditions are associated with poor summers in the UK. And rather than building up this summer and peaking this autumn as usual, the effect has been delayed (due to the strong El Nino?) and so the La Nina effect looks most likely to peak in Autumn 2017 – suggesting a long build up over early 2017 and so it will have the greatest effects in summer 2017 … and I assume extending into winter 2017.

For days now, twitter has been filled with SNP stooges accusing Westminster of the vilest insults of “racism” and “xenophobia” for merely suggesting that they might compile a list of all foreign workers who would be affected by the change in their right to work in the UK all egged on by Nicola Sturgeon

Scottish firms which ignore new UK rules on revealing how many foreign workers they hire have been told they will have the backing of Nicola Sturgeon. The First Minister says she will stand “full square behind” any Scots company which snubs the new rules unveiled by Home Secretary Amber Rudd this week amid claims of racism.

Referring to the idea of a list of foreign workers she said:

Well, I think it’s about time the Tories stood up and said this, that it’s definitely something they will not ever do because it would be downright disgraceful and disgusting, and this government would have absolutely nothing to do with it.”

Read more

And it’s not just Sturgeon:
SNP MP evokes Nazi persecution poem in attack on Tory Brexit
Pete Wishart, who represents Perth and Perthshire North, appeared to make comparisons between Nazi Germany and Brexit Britain in a tweet.

First they came for the berry farm workers. Then they came for the Drs. Next they came for the ….. #toryBrexit #yourUK

— Pete Wishart (@PeteWishart) October 4, 2016

He referenced Martin Niemoller’s poem about persecution in the Third Reich as he reacted to comments made from Conservative ministers during their conference.
And true to form, the SNP drones were quickly out in force attacking the English & English establishment for their supposed Holocaust Nazi style attack on foreigners for compiling a list of foreigner’s names:

#indyref2 #brexit #peace #itsallgonepetetong #toriesout #horrificshit #wtf #Scotland #indynow pic.twitter.com/Qr1Igc4PVz

— niki (@niki500) October 7, 2016

#brokentogether: When they came for those on the list, I did nothing.#indyref2: for a list free society https://t.co/HYKEwjOUK6 — Bert Logan (@2p3rf3ct) October 9, 2016

However, after all these vile anti-English insults accusing anyone and everyone south of the border of being “Xenophobes”, “racists”, “bigots” etc. …. after all this hate speech against the English for considering compiling a list of foreigners…
What do we now hear? … that the SNP have compiled just such a list, without any consent of parliament either Scottish or UK, without the consent of those asked, contrary to UK data protection laws, that far from just thinking about creating the list  … that they have sent out letters to everyone, passed on personal details (again contrary to UK data protection laws), used it to stoke up fear (contrary to UK terrorism law?) … etc. etc.

Nicola Sturgeon’s ‘secret EU foreigner list’ sparks immigration diplomacy row

This is just classic SNP tactics: they pretend to be against racism & xenophobia and then their drone like army of supporters goes out to attack everything English for merely thinking about compiling a list … when the SNP hypocrites have already done it themselves.
Sturgeon, by the logic of her own vile Xenophobic propaganda machine …. is a xenophobe and racist just for compiling the list … and so by the logic of her own propaganda machine, she is unfit for government.

Just go, before you do Scotland more damage.

I am astonished at the corrupt US legal system in which certain people in public office, by virtue of being in control of who gets investigated and those doing the investigation, are immune from prosecution.
We often hear the word “corruption” used on the internet, but usually in the sense of “politically corrupt” – that is, saying one thing and doing another or trading political (i.e. PARTY) favours. But what the Clintons have been doing is literally criminally corrupt they are the one’s benefiting financially – and it just beggars belief that she is not being prosecuted – let alone standing for President. What can people in the US  be thinking? Surely given how widespread their behaviour – it must have been known by almost every senior Democrat that Clinton is unfit for government.
She’s not just dishonest, but there is not overwhelming evidence she (or those close to her) have acted criminally – and who is the person who decides who gets investigated? She is –  she is the one who decides she gets away with it.

And it gets worse. You’d think that lying under oath would have been enough to bring her down, but there appears to be plenty of evidence the “Clinton foundation” is an organisation used to channel bribes to the Clintons and to syphon off $billions to the Clintons. As the Haitian president said, of the Billions that the world gave the Clinton foundation to help Haiti after the earthquake: “not even 2% went to Haiti”. That is appalling!
Like Trump or loath him, the truth is he’s way better than Clinton – and if you vote Clinton don’t ever complain about corrupt government because you just voted for one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phKO2T2pMjM

CLINTON CASH OFFICIAL DOCUMENTARY MOVIE ( FULL )
https://youtu.be/7LYRUOd_QoM

Trump, like Farage, like Boris Johnson, like an increasing number of politicians, represents a class that the media and most politicians hate: those who speak up for the concerns and interests of ordinary people which the political elite have long kept repressed.
As such, there’s little doubt that the initial reaction to President Trump will be like that of our own hissy fit Sturgeon who finding out that the people had voted against her wishes for Brexit then went on a month long rant about how she was going to stop the people having their wish to leave the parasitic EU (although obviously she didn’t quite put it that way).
So, the immediate aftermath of president Trump is going to be hilarious. All the PC nutters will …  go bonkers … blow their fuses … generally huff and puff …. and demand a recount (where only they and their chums get to vote).
However, after the fun we have the serious issues. What would a Trump Presidency look like.

PC (Political Correctness = press conformist)

The one thing Trump doesn’t do is PC, and that is why all those PC-fascists forcing their nutter ideas on the public, will be flipping their lids.Whether it is global warming, Gay rights, sex “equality” (but note it’s only when it benefits women), or whatever, Trump is not going to be over concerned to open the door and listen to them.
The main effect, is going to be a loss of public money syphoned to the parasitic PC-fascist organisations who previously kept themselves well paid by threatening any politician with bad publicity who did not roll over and do their bidding.
So, watch out for the dying squeals as like a bagpipe being sat on – the wind goes out of these PC-fascists!

UK Trade Deals

The election of Mr Trump is likely to help Britain as it seeks to strike a trade deal with America in a post-Brexit world. Trump was a big supporter of Brexit and said that Britain would not be “at the back of the queue” for a trade deal with the US.
And as the Express goes on: “In many ways, Mr Trump may get on well with Britain’s new eccentric Foreign Minister Boris Johnson who was the figurehead of the Brexit campaign.”
(Sturgeon is going to hate this – Britain doing well from Brexit!)

Foreign Policy

Mr Trump supports warmer relations with Russia’s strongman President Vladimir Putin and I doubt he will be very warm to all those PC nutters who run the EU. According to the Express: ” Trump has prompted concerns among security ‘experts’ by making comments that seem to indicate tolerance of Russia’s aggression in Eastern Europe” – these are undoubtedly the same “‘experts” who predicted the demise of the British economy post Brexit! However, it does seem likely that Trump will be in favour of the Russians securing control over Russian speaking areas of Ukraine – in return for dealing with ISIS.
Trump has said he might leave NATO unless it reforms. He appears to be in favour of action against ISIS (but changes his mind a lot). Like “Mexico paying for the wall”, he favours the Saudis paying to combat ISIS (which is fair as they use money earned from us from oil to fund Islamic groups and stir up problems as well as funding subversive groups that interfere a lot in US and UK politics).

Immigration

Everyone knows there is already a border fence between the US and Mexico, so I can’t see why anyone but a PC nutter of a immigrant “pimp” would be fussed by strengthening it. But the key point here, is that once President Trump allocates money to strengthen the boarder – he then makes boarder control a profitable enterprise. And having pulled the plug on many of the parasitic organisations that push for increased immigration – this change in finding will change the balance of the public debate, not just in the US but also in the UK (the next target for “tighter security”?).
Whilst it may seem a small change, the effect of so much money ($12billion is being discussed) – like the similar vicious cycle of wind funding wind lobbyists to push wind, the creation of “wall lobbyists” pushing for “tighter border security” could relatively quickly totally change the public perception of how to treat illegal immigrants.

US Economic Policy

Firstly, Trump is going to be a lot less sympathetic to US debt than any recent predecessor. This invariably means a reduction in the public spend. High in the list of useless spending is the nonsense on climate. But generally, it will likely this will mean dramatic cuts in many agencies and many branches of government (getting rid of admin overheads is the first thing any businessman does). It will also mean the end of US spend on anything frivolous (like the daft Paris climate “deal”). However, the US can’t possibly pay back their deficit unless they start growing their own economy. He has hinted this will start by utilising their fossil fuel reserves. As such, we are likely to see the price of energy globally dropping.

The Effect on Scotland

With the (anti-fossil fuel) SNP being so reliant on high oil prices to fund their “separation under EU chains” promise, the election of President Trump will effectively be the end of that dream (nightmare),  not only for Trumps term as president, but when Americans see the benefit of this pro-fossil fuel policy, the US push to export fossil fuels will drop the price of energy for many years effectively taking separation off the political agenda in Scotland and making the SNP a useless appendage to Scottish politics.
But not only SNP politicians will face job losses, with so many jobs still being dependent on the North Sea – and therefore on high oil prices – the election of Trump and lower energy prices, will effectively end the dominance of North Sea Oil and dramatically reduce revenue in Scotland.
It seems likely that Aberdeen will collapse as an oil producing region. Fracking could have replaced that – but the insane SNP are against the only way to save all those energy jobs. And with the increasing cost of energy (relative to the rest of the world) in Scotland due to the insane wind policy – we’ll see less and less heavy industry as it moves to places with cheaper energy (the US?). And  …with that insane wind policy destroying the Scottish scenery – and the Trump led return to common sense over climate, not only will those bird-mincers we have mean we’ll see fewer and fewer tourists(and birds, and bats), but without the need for wind created by the daft NOAA, NASA and pushed through at Paris, there will be no one to sell this appalling expensive folly of a energy source to.
And with the SNP still obsessed with giving away our fishing to Europe .., well can anyone tell me anything that Scotland is good for?
However, on the positive side – immigration into Scotland will not be a problem -because we’ll all be wanting to leave – particularly if we were mad enough to rejoin EU (and EU mad enough to have us). Although if we did join EU there might be some business reconstructing Hadrian’s wall to keep the daft Scots who voted to leave the prosperous UK north of the border?

The end of the illusion that Politicians cannot be prosecuted

For reasons that are pretty obvious, politicians of all parties are against politicians being prosecuted for the crimes they commit. So, e.g. if I organised to bring 10 illegal immigrants into the UK – that would be illegal, and if found out, I would undoubtedly (??may not??) serve a prison sentence. But if a politician organises for 10million illegal immigrants to come into our country – that is not deemed a crime at all.
Likewise, on climate. If NASA, NOAA and the UK Met Office fraudulently produce data to alter the apparent “rate of change” – in the same way as a banker fraudulently changed the LIBOR rate – that apparently is not criminal. Nor is the BBC breaking its charter obligation, nor is slander and hate speech by politicians using phrases like “denier”.
In other words, politicians and big “establishment” organisations have thought themselves above the law – laws that only apply to plebs like you and me and not the establishment elite.
But Trump owes the political establishment nothing. If Klinton has broken the law, if NASA are fraudulently producing climate data, if the EPA broke the US constitution … why shouldn’t Trump prosecute them for their crimes?
But, once we in the UK, see that public officials can be prosecuted in the US (and undoubtedly it will be juicy, because they never thought they’d ever face the repercussions … so they won’t have been careful) … there will be similar calls in the UK for prosecutions. It may well be that Blair finally sees the inside of prison. That those in the BBC who routinely break their Charter obligations find there is legal redress for us ordinary plebs. That not only climategate, but Hillsborough and many similar “inquiries” get opened up and those responsible end up going to prison. Merely because President Trump got elected.
You can see why the establishment, the PC-fascists, the eco-fascists, the XXX right fascists, the …. every fascist is against Trump. Indeed, when we look back in a few decades time … it may well be deemed as the end of the “PC-era”?

Guardian: ‘I’m a gentleman’: Trump “menaces” Clinton with imposing presence and brash insults 
Seriously? That’s their big headline after the debate! To portray their supposed “president Klinton” as a victim threatened by Trump saying:

“No, I’m a gentleman, Hillary, go ahead.”

What will their next headline be? Trump accused of Fascist Sexism by opening door for Klinton (who from all accounts would stumble through it).
BBC: “US presidential debate: Trump launches ferocious attack on Clintons”.

“There’s never been anybody in the history of politics that has been so abusive to women,” he said.
Hillary Clinton refused to address his comments about her husband.

And no mention of that Trump would jail Clinton for illegally withholding emails in clear contradiction to explicit instructions when she took the job.
Independent: “Bill Clinton remains stony faced as Donald Trump brings up rape claims“.

“It’s just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country.”
“Because you’d be in jail,” he quipped back, to the biggest reaction of the night from the live studio audience

Over the last years there’s been a clear consistent message coming from the US: those agencies like NOAA, NASA, EPA, etc. can break the law with impunity because they are protected by the president.
So, when I started hearing the Clinton had likewise broken the law and as far as I can see, intentionally hid emails, I was not surprised that rather than being prosecuted for what appears to be a clear cut case of breaking the law … she was running for president.
And, like the tip of the ice-berg the amount of corruption that I could see in the US, must only be the tip of the ice-berg. So, I can understand why many Republicans are against Trump – because when you have corruption in government – it usually involves all parties.
But last night, Trump said that if he were president, he’d jail Clinton. What is extraordinary here – is not that someone who broke the law will be facing a real investigation intending to convict her (if the evidence points that way – as it does), but that a high profile politician is subject to the same laws and same penalties as the lowly people they lord it over.
And that will be a huge shock to politicians – not only democrats who have had their nose so deep in the trough during Obama’s monarchy – but also republicans – who clearly assumed that when they got their man in – they’d have their turn at the trough.
But … if there’s anyone who’ll be burning their emails today in one huge metaphorical bonfire … it’ll be NASA, NOAA, EPA, Michael Mann, Hansen and all those others who have escaped investigation for the global warming scam under Obama.
Addendum
Croinies – was a typo – but I like the way it is half way between croney and coin-ies.