As I predicted, Starmer is proving absolutely toxic to the Liebour party. He is destroying whatever hope they have left of ever forming another government. But, it’s not Starmer that did it. It is the party that allowed, even enabled, a man like Starmer, the participant of genocide and illegal wars, to get to power.

So I don’t care if Starmer goes. He is toxic and the longer he stays the less chance that Liebour will ever have power again. And so, they too are going the way of the old Whigs.

But what if they pick a new leader? A new leader who can see what Nut Zero and Zionist wars is doing to the economy … which makes a wipe-out of Liebour at the next election ineviable.

So, it is just possible that a new Liebour leader, hoping for a honeymoon effect, will call a new election. Anyone stupid enough to be picked by the Zionists who control Liebour, will probably be stupid enough to believe that they have the “magic” touch to get the Zionist controlled media to love them.

However, will it wash with the gullible British public? I’m not sure I care. I feel like a slave on a plantation watching the masters fight. As long as they are fighting each other, they’re not whipping us. But heaven forbid any of us plebs who get caught smiling!

Hoisted on their own lies

Of course, as far as the Epstein-Zionists are controlled, destroying the left would be a desirable outcome. Which in their minds would mean destroying Liebour. So, keeping Starmer in position will end up with a “right” and thus “pro-Genocide” party … and least that is very likely how they think.

But the Zionist left versus right (always an Epstein Zionist in control) politics is a thing of the past. The public are gullible, but they aren’t fools and despite the most totalitarian brave-new world levels of censorship and control, that system now leaks like a sieve and the truth is getting out. The old order is falling apart, with no clear idea of what is to come. But I suspect it will be hated by those who thrived in the old order where the Epstein Zionist elite supported the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the original chosen people of Palestine.

I read the paper trying to reproduce the flight paths taken by the 911 jets, just before I was about to fly. Which was bizarre enough, but then I found I could not update the article. The reason for the updates not saving still remains unclear, but I did suspect the editor was blocking links to the 911 site, and/or any mention of the genocide of the indigenous people of Palestine.

Of course, there were many different possible explanations from the mundane to the very sinister. Hence, having finally got most of what I wanted to say and the links online (… even if in different articles and not at all well edited), I decided to leave everything as it was … before boreding (isn’t the contempt they have for “passengers” amazing … watching the sheep line up like Palestinians going to the slaughter).

Thus, as I sat squashed in the window seat in the back rows of the plane, I did wonder … as I suspect anyone with the unusual chain of events would, if the worst possible interpretation were true, how my being on the plane was going to be connected with the 911 article. My single hand bag contained 3pants, 3 pairs of socks, (6 socks), 3 teashirts, and a toothbrush, razor a book, camera, rainproof and shorts/nightwear. It seemed the most unlikely retinue to pin on me some kind of “terrorist” actions. So, I quickly went back to watching the black and white version of whisky galore.

Lone Gunmen

But, it did start me wondering how they selected and manipulated people to become the “lone gunmen” that they (usually Zionists) always use to pin the blame on. Did the lone gunmen ever hold any view about anything, or were they merely offered love or riches for their services … neither of which they could ever collect. Was their entire “social” media account then fabricated to match the “extremist lone gunmen” profile “they” always use.

But what I really do wonder, is how they manage to convince someone to basically commit suicide. To anyone hearing of the story afterwards, it sounds bizarre that someone walks into a situation where they are going to be killed. Yet, I have seen the world’s biggest “petrolheads” go from one gaz guzzler to an electric guzzler … something which is just insanely stupid at every level. Yet they were manipulated into thinking black is white.

So, I do know people can be fooled. Likewise when the covid scam came along, I too was fooled … at least to take it seriously for about three months. But little did I realise that the dinosaur of government is not only incapable of action, it is incapable of changing course once that course is set. So, even if Covid had been real and not just the usual flu epidemic rebranded by a failed PCR test and turned into a terror attack by government propaganda, the best course was to just let sleeping governments lie … and keep lying … so long as they did nothing about the fake epidemic of covid.

The End of Climate Alarmism

Ten years ago, I would have been celebrating the end of climate alarmism. I imagined that someday the science would win, and then the alarmists would go off to find something else to be alarmist about. Instead, the science has not won. Instead the practical reality of the ongoing destruction of the economy has turned the public away from the alarmism despite the continuing lies from the alarmists about their supposed “science”. It’s not even fizzled out, it has just ended in an embarrassing mess … rather like the last drunk at a party still shouting and refusing to leave.

There’s no triumph in that. The science has not been improved, instead the funds are running out for all science as the economy is set to decline. We didn’t win the debate … because there was never a debate about the science … instead the big bully in the room with the funding to force “black is white” propaganda as “science” … came head to head with the economic reality that they too relied on the fossil fuel economy they are destroying. And so their scandalous funders, believing in a “get rich quick” scam, are now facing economic ruin and pulling the plug on their “money making” scam.

There is no good way out of the current situation. The US is already slowly fading as a global power and sooner or later it will have a catastrophic economic decline. The EU is a complete basket case. It has no democratic legitimacy and now no economic legitimacy. It is militarily impotent, politically ignorant, and set on a course of Nut Zero economic suicide. But, let’s be honest, except for not being officially tied to the EU or US sinking ship, practically we are. When they go down, we are going down with them.

That’s why climate alarmism no longer matters. Because the insane science and politics that enabled climate alarmism has destroyed our futures. There are no more (plastic) lego blocks to build their ivory towered utopias where there are no fossil fuels. The only reason fossil fuel use is going to decline, is because the economy will shrink. And, as the economy shrinks, the use of fossil fuels as a fraction will increase, because especially in a shrinking economy, people will always opt for the cheapest fuel sources.

Fortunately, the timescales are long. Perhaps we are looking at a century of decline .. decline that will be sold Epstein “elite” controlled government as “economic growth”, but living standards will get worse and worse throughout that “growth”, until sometime in a few hundred years, an Iranian academic will finally write a paper in the Arabic scientific literature about the economic decline of the west. Or maybe Russian or Chinese … or Swahili.

What then of the US?

The US is a stitched together mish mash of states who barely survive as a single unit in the best of times. There is no doubt that when economic decline becomes the norm, the US will split apart. Whether north America ever reaches the same patchwork of countries as became the once single empires of Portugal and Spain in South America, is debatable, but a real possibility. Would the North ever become known as little more than a drug runner’s paradise? Who knows? My bet is that when the US economy fails, the old rational of a single country transferring wealth around from the rich to the poor states will completely implode. Instead the rich states will resist the demands for them to contribute more, and separate off, leaving the poorer states in a big union like the old USSR, and the richer states pretending to be independent (like a cross between the arrogance of Switzerland and the economy of Ukraine).

Will there be another US (un)civil war? Morality and common sense has nothing to do with US politics. Will it suit the Epstein-Zionists to have a civil war? Probably. It is far easier to control one government by blackmail, than a dozen or so new states. So, they will attempt to stop any state leaving the US by force. Of course, that will just make the present situation even less tolerable and fasten the demise of the US cash cow. So, look out China … the Epstein-Zionists are coming for you next!

911

Thinking about it, Trump has already tried to distract the people from his participation in the genocide of the indigenous people of Palestine (the actual chosen people) with an illegal immoral & failed war against Iran and UFO bullshit. It is now logical he tries 911, fukuvirus and every other kind of distraction bullshit.

Governments use conspiracy to hide the truth. The truth is the US and all the Epstein-Zionist regimes are participating the genocide and ethnic cleansing of what any rational analysis would see as “God’s chosen people” as described in the bible.

It’s not going to change my view of the Zionist occupiers & genociders of the chosen people of Palestine to hear that they were also the ones who caused the planes to fly into the towers. It’s not going to change my view of the US Epstein “government” to learn they were participants in 911, the Kennedy & Diana assassination, etc. So, I don’t need or want to know about the US 911 especially at this time Trump is trying to distract us.

What is happening in Palestine is truly the most sickening evil. Of course they would kill thousands of civilians in the US, just as easily as they are killing 100s of thousands of “gods chosen” people in Palestine. There is no morality for evil. There is no morality for Epstein Zionists. There is no evil they wouldn’t commit. They have even murdered Jews in there thousands! Zionism is just a sick cult … which like the Wako cult, looks like it will end up in a grizzly ending.

I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.

Comment

I can’t obviously see what is either being blocked or creating an issue, as there is nothing that should be a problem. However I don’t want to waste more time on the evils of the US and Zionists. Epstein-Zionists … the most disgusting and evil people in the world. Responsible for genocide, ethnic cleansing paedophilia, mass murder, assassinations, killing numerous people like Charlie Kirk. Creators of conspiracy theories to divert attention away from the truth … the truth that they are vile.

NB. I was unable to post the following using the usual editor.

Main link to report: https://ic911.org/reports/manual-or-automated/

Addendum

Link: LINK

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.

I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.

However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).

Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.
US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

Whatever the truth about 911, it is not going to change my view of the US. The US officially spreads conspiracy theories and the US has officially killed its own citizens and participated genocide, ethnic cleansing and numerous other war crimes. The “truth” of 911 isn’t going to change the obnoxious nature of the US whose population still enables the Epstein-Zionist Paedophiles to remain in control

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.
The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.
However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.
Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way. They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.
I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.
So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.
Could they all be mistakes?
In order for the paths that were taken to have been taken, it would need to be an unplanned route. But I know from my own experience, that if I wanted to hit a particular side of the building, I would fly around the building till I was roughly heading in the right direction and then I would take a well rehearsed and direct path flight in. Especially if I were intending to commit suicide. Human nature would always find an excuse not to commit suicide. So, anyone planning a suicide flight is going to do it in a very rehearsed way and easy to execute way to minimise the opportunity for excuses for “missing”. Likewise the Pentagon is going to be hit with the simplest descent. That means lining up the building in the centre of the window and keeping as direct a route to the building as possible. There is no way that anyone would attempt to a steep dive that loses visual contact with the target and then “fly at ground level” into the building. They will line up the building and fly a direct line attempting to avoid any changes in flight from that direct line.
Could it be explained by some structural issue of the building meaning some non-obvious flight path is optimum … NO!! Even with the simplest flight path, there is still a high risk for an inexperienced pilot of missing a building. No amount of simulation can prepare for the real world. There could have been cloud, fog, a mistaken building identity. This is a one-shot mission, with an extremely high chance of failure, because no one naturally commits suicide and no simulator can prepare someone for the reality of killing themselves.
Summary
Means

Assuming the facts are correct, my conclusion is that the facts are incompatible with a suicide flight by amateurs. The only viable alternatives is that some very experienced military grade fighter pilots killed themselves, or that the planes were remotely controlled.
Motive

The same as the illegal Zionist war against Iran, to convince the gullible US public to support a war to destroy a potential military competitor to the Zionist takeover of the middle east. It clearly wasn’t anything to do with Al Kidya … they weren’t in Iraq. Iraq was nothing to do with 911, yet the US-Epstein class chose to link 911 to Iraq. The only way to link them was a lie, which implies that 911 and the supposed link to Al Kidya was a lie. (We knew that before this research).
Additional

It is pretty clear that Dr David Kelly of the WMD dodgy dossier was murdered, and so it is now pretty certain he was murdered by the same people for the same reason: to enable the Zionist attack on Iraq.

We have been told by an MI6 operative, that Princess Di Survived the car crash and was murdered in the ambulance taking her away because she was going to start working for Palestinian rights.

Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was growing sceptical of the Zionists.
Kennedy was telling the Zionists they could not have nuclear weapons and then he was murdered.

We know the USS liberty was attacked by the Zionists as a false flag attack to blame the Arabs during the six day way, all with the foreknowledge of the US president.
Individually, I might still have some scepticism, but put together there is a clear pattern of lies and murder all pointing back to the Zionists. The one I was not sure about was 911. The motive was clear, but except for one video saying that debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon was not a commercial jet liner, I had no confirmatory evidence. This latest research (assuming the facts are correct), is confirmation that 911 wasn’t a terrorist attack. Based on all the other Zionist involved plots, it is most likely some form of US/Zionist involved false flag attack.
Sense Check

I’ve reread the discussion of “alternative scenarios” and I cannot see any flaw in the reasoning and so the conclusion seems valid.

Is it possible that someone else planned the attack to blame on Zionists? That seems an incredibly hard argument to make. I’ve never seen a hint of any group capable of this scale of attack being considered for anything similar. Someone somewhere would have suggested alternatives if there were viable alternatives.

Is it possible that the Kennedy assassination was a “lone gunman” who for some unknown reason wanted to kill the president and himself? I’ve never seen any plausible explanation for the behaviour. The only beneficiaries I know from the replacement of Kennedy by his vice president were the Zionists.

Diana survived the car crash. I is incredible that a healthy person who I think was walking around afterwards, should die in the ambulance in a way that they could not be revived. I can’t imagine a mechanism that would do that, which wouldn’t have left such obvious clues that we would all know about it. A car crash even at 80mph, is easily survival as all formula 1 drivers will testify. The only way for Di to have died is if she had to be dragged from wreckage with obvious severe injuries, that did not happen.

Does anyone go out with a blunt penknife to kill themselves? NO!!! And, even if they tried, they would not succeed. A Weapon’s expert knows a lot about dying and they know how to do it quickly and effectively. If they decided to do it, it would be quick, minimising pain and very thorough. That is totally incompatible with a blunt pen knife.
Conspiracy Theories

The simple truth is that the whole modern genre of conspiracy theories was invented by the CIA to cover their U2 spy plane operations by filling the local media with false claims of UFO. It’s also clear from the deluge of conspiracy theories which needs a huge budget, that a massively well funded group like the CIA must have been funding many other conspiracy ideas.

That doesn’t mean every wacky idea is a conspiracy theory invented by the CIA, but a hell of a lot of them are. It also doesn’t mean they are the only ones engaged in these false leads and coverups, but some must be linked to the CIA.

As such, I originally thought that the CIA had invented many of the theories to try to cover up their own mishandling of events. However, I am now forced to face the fact that the planes must have been remote controlled. And, at least the Pentagon one wasn’t a civilian aircraft. That begs the question as to what happened to the supposed passengers, but if you are killing 20,000 in the towers, what are a few extra passengers?

At one point I might have questioned whether any human could have could blooded killed 20,000. Then I saw the cold blooded murder being committed by the Zionists in Palestine, and it’s very clear they could and are doing it.

Is it possible that the 911 “remote controlled aircraft” idea is itself something created by some group. Yes it is. But if so, I don’t know who it would be. The only candidates for creating the conspiracy are people who would be on the US “intelligence” radar and unless they are complicit, they would be detected.

I just don’t see any plausible way to put the evidence available, or even a sceptical view of the available evidence, and come up with a coherent alternative explanation other than a US-Zionist plot. The only contender would be e.g. Russian intelligence trying to discredit the US or Zionists. But from observation, the Russians are useless at the kind of propaganda needed to create conspiracies. It’s just not the way they work. The Zionists might try to create a conspiracy … but why would the Zionists want to implicate Zionists?
As a fictional character (didn’t) say: “when you have removed all the impossible, what is left, no matter how improbable …”

I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.
Addendum

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.

I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.

However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).

Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.
US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

Whatever the truth about 911, it is not going to change my view of the US. The US officially spreads conspiracy theories and the US has officially killed its own citizens and participated genocide, ethnic cleansing and numerous other war crimes. The “truth” of 911 isn’t going to change the obnoxious nature of the US whose population still enables the Epstein-Zionist Paedophiles to remain in control

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.
The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.
However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.
Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way.  They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.
I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.
So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.
Could they all be mistakes?
In order for the paths that were taken to have been taken, it would need to be an unplanned route. But I know from my own experience, that if I wanted to hit a particular side of the building, I would fly around the building till I was roughly heading in the right direction and then I would take a well rehearsed and direct path flight in. Especially if I were intending to commit suicide. Human nature would always find an excuse not to commit suicide. So, anyone planning a suicide flight is going to do it in a very rehearsed way and easy to execute way to minimise the opportunity for excuses for “missing”. Likewise the Pentagon is going to be hit with the simplest descent. That means lining up the building in the centre of the window and keeping as direct a route to the building as possible. There is no way that anyone would attempt to a steep dive that loses visual contact with the target and then “fly at ground level” into the building. They will line up the building and fly a direct line attempting to avoid any changes in flight from that direct line.
Could it be explained by some structural issue of the building meaning some non-obvious flight path is optimum … NO!! Even with the simplest flight path, there is still a high risk for an inexperienced pilot of missing a building. No amount of simulation can prepare for the real world. There could have been cloud, fog, a mistaken building identity. This is a one-shot mission, with an extremely high chance of failure, because no one naturally commits suicide and no simulator can prepare someone for the reality of killing themselves.
Summary
Means
Assuming the facts are correct, my conclusion is that the facts are incompatible with a suicide flight by amateurs. The only viable alternatives is that some very experienced military grade fighter pilots killed themselves, or that the planes were remotely controlled.
Motive
The same as the illegal Zionist war against Iran, to convince the gullible US public to support a war to destroy a potential military competitor to the Zionist takeover of the middle east. It clearly wasn’t anything to do with Al Kidya … they weren’t in Iraq. Iraq was nothing to do with 911, yet the US-Epstein class chose to link 911 to Iraq. The only way to link them was a lie, which implies that 911 and the supposed link to Al Kidya was a lie. (We knew that before this research).
Additional
It is pretty clear that Dr David Kelly of the WMD dodgy dossier was murdered, and so it is now pretty certain he was murdered by the same people for the same reason: to enable the Zionist attack on Iraq.
We have been told by an MI6 operative, that Princess Di Survived the car crash and was murdered in the ambulance taking her away because she was going to start working for Palestinian rights.
Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was growing sceptical of the Zionists.
Kennedy was telling the Zionists they could not have nuclear weapons and then he was murdered.
We know the USS liberty was attacked by the Zionists as a false flag attack to blame the Arabs during the six day way, all with the foreknowledge of the US president.
Individually, I might still have some scepticism, but put together there is a clear pattern of lies and murder all pointing back to the Zionists. The one I was not sure about was 911. The motive was clear, but except for one video saying that debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon was not a commercial jet liner, I had no confirmatory evidence. This latest research (assuming the facts are correct), is confirmation that 911 wasn’t a terrorist attack. Based on all the other Zionist involved plots, it is most likely some form of US/Zionist involved false flag attack.
Sense Check
I’ve reread the discussion of “alternative scenarios” and I cannot see any flaw in the reasoning and so the conclusion seems valid.
Is it possible that someone else planned the attack to blame on Zionists? That seems an incredibly hard argument to make. I’ve never seen a hint of any group capable of this scale of attack being considered for anything similar. Someone somewhere would have suggested alternatives if there were viable alternatives.
Is it possible that the Kennedy assassination was a “lone gunman” who for some unknown reason wanted to kill the president and himself? I’ve never seen any plausible explanation for the behaviour. The only beneficiaries I know from the replacement of Kennedy by his vice president were the Zionists.
Diana survived the car crash. I is incredible that a healthy person who I think was walking around afterwards, should die in the ambulance in a way that they could not be revived. I can’t imagine a mechanism that would do that, which wouldn’t have left such obvious clues that we would all know about it. A car crash even at 80mph, is easily survival as all formula 1 drivers will testify. The only way for Di to have died is if she had to be dragged from wreckage with obvious severe injuries, that did not happen.
Does anyone go out with a blunt penknife to kill themselves? NO!!! And, even if they tried, they would not succeed. A Weapon’s expert knows a lot about dying and they know how to do it quickly and effectively. If they decided to do it, it would be quick, minimising pain and very thorough. That is totally incompatible with a blunt pen knife.
Conspiracy Theories
The simple truth is that the whole modern genre of conspiracy theories was invented by the CIA to cover their U2 spy plane operations by filling the local media with false claims of UFO. It’s also clear from the deluge of conspiracy theories which needs a huge budget, that a massively well funded group like the CIA must have been funding many other conspiracy ideas.
That doesn’t mean every wacky idea is a conspiracy theory invented by the CIA, but a hell of a lot of them are. It also doesn’t mean they are the only ones engaged in these false leads and coverups, but some must be linked to the CIA.
As such, I originally thought that the CIA had invented many of the theories to try to cover up their own mishandling of events. However, I am now forced to face the fact that the planes must have been remote controlled. And, at least the Pentagon one wasn’t a civilian aircraft. That begs the question as to what happened to the supposed passengers, but if you are killing 20,000 in the towers, what are a few extra passengers?
At one point I might have questioned whether any human could have could blooded killed 20,000. Then I saw the cold blooded murder being committed by the Zionists in Palestine, and it’s very clear they could and are doing it.
Is it possible that the 911 “remote controlled aircraft” idea is itself something created by some group. Yes it is. But if so, I don’t know who it would be. The only candidates for creating the conspiracy are people who would be on the US “intelligence” radar and unless they are complicit, they would be detected.
I just don’t see any plausible way to put the evidence available, or even a sceptical view of the available evidence, and come up with a coherent alternative explanation other than a US-Zionist plot. The only contender would be e.g. Russian intelligence trying to discredit the US or Zionists. But from observation, the Russians are useless at the kind of propaganda needed to create conspiracies. It’s just not the way they work. The Zionists might try to create a conspiracy … but why would the Zionists want to implicate Zionists?
As a fictional character (didn’t) say: “when you have removed all the impossible, what is left, no matter how improbable …”
I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.
I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.
Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?
No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale
The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.
However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.
We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.

Addendum

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.
I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.
However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).
Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.

US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.

The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.

However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.

Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way.  They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.

I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.

So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.

Could they all be mistakes?

Continue reading →

In a previous post I said I was going to vote SNP.

Then I heard the SNP were going to declare a right to chain Scotland to the least government in the world and make voting pointless.

Then I remembered we had a list system and I could put the parties on a list from first to last. So, I carefully researched the various parties working out an order which would put pro-Palestinian parties first. I finally decided to put SSP first, an Independent Green next, some independents who seemed likely to be pro-Palestine, a few other parties that were pro-Palestine and then just in case Reform.

Having carefully worked out the order to place them, I arrived at the polling station to be told that the SNP had changed the voting system so I only had one vote. That would have caused me to vote in a very different way … one I had not researched … so all my planning to vote to support smaller parties went out the window. I had to vote for a party with a chance of getting a seat. Labour was voting for the most evil PM we’ve ever had. I’ve still not forgiven the Lib Dems for their contemptuous behaviour after we voted to leave the EU – and there was nothing about the local candidate on Palestine. I promised myself that I would never vote Tory again following their appalling behaviour during covid and Brexit. And, I had no idea of the chances of the SSP … which meant I was likely throwing my vote away on a party that I had nothing in common with except they are against the genocide of Palestinians.

The only choice I had was “old contempt” or “new change” … and with the Greens trumpeting their noxious anti-family policies and generally reminding me how much I loathed the current party, and the SNP having made me extremely angry by changing the voting system and just generally being obnoxious, I wasn’t voting for them. So, despite my promise to my self to vote pro-Palestine, the only party left on my list with a good chance of getting a seat was Reform.

I had actually thought I might just vote “non of the above” … until I first remembered there was a list system, and then discovered there was not … and I was so angry I just forgot about that option.

It did help that I saw two reform candidates had supported Palestine … though the leadership’s sucking up to the genociders was still hard to swallow. But rather angrily, because it wasn’t what I planned to do and didn’t have time to think it through,  I hastily voted Reform.

Climate

Note: I didn’t even consider climate as an issue. The reason is the moronic politicians no longer have any option but to bow before the reality of the situation. They can huff and puff all they like, but they ain’t going any further with nut zero. So, why should I care what the policy of the idiots in power is on that subject, when it can’t affect the outcome any longer?

There’s little doubt in my mind that the same people were behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination as much as Kennedy’s or indeed Princess Di. They all seemed strange at the time, the stories just did not make sense. But, as I’ve learnt more and more about the behaviour of those who committed the crimes, it all fits an oft repeated pattern.

Yet, 60 years ago when they killed President Kennedy, the world was a very different place in terms of what someone like me could get to know. Unless I happened to know someone on the team investigating the assassinations, or happened to be part of the group organising and carrying out the assassinations, then it would be extremely difficult to know anything other than what the media was telling me. And, that media is controlled by much the same groups with the same intent of stifling any information on certain subjects.

Yet, now with the internet, I, and along with me many other like Neil Oliver, do get to hear about all these appalling things that happen in the world … things that we would never have heard about in the past.

To many, who weren’t aware, or haven’t worked it out, it must seem that the world has suddenly become overwhelmed with evil. Yet, that evil always existed. It killed Kennedy, it killed Diana, and recently it killed Charlie Kirk. That evil is not new, what is new, is that we now know the “official” narrative is a total load of codswallop. And we know that because of the internet.

So, the internet is a great thing?

Continue reading →

I’ve been watching Neil Oliver’s videos for a while, and it is clear that he is becoming increasingly convinced that something is seriously wrong and therefore that we are heading toward “doom”.

And, I agree, except we’ve been heading that way for a lot longer than Neil Oliver has realised. And, I know the type of people who are “leading the way”, and I am pretty certain that most of them would be totally clueless about the huge “conspiracy” that Neil now sees all around him.

But, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Just because those in the thick of it can’t see what their actions are doing, doesn’t mean the combined effect of their actions isn’t heading the way Neil Oliver is seeing.

Neil has this firm idea that there is some “controlling mind” orchestrating the destruction of so much that we value. In contrast, I see a few idiots with brain dead ideas who get a lot of publicity, and a lot of complicit people in positions of power who just go along with whatever they assume is the way to go. They are not conspiring to destroy the world, they are simply destroying the world without much thinking about it.

But, in a sense that kind of person is far more dangerous than some controlling mind. A controlling mind has a sense of purpose and an idea of what they want to achieve and what they do not. The people who actually “control” the west aren’t like that. They have vague ideas about strange things like “Carbon” and they get bombarded with ideas from people wanting to use these vague ideas to make themselves rich, and somehow that all gets developed into “government policy” … without a lot of thought and with no scepticism or search for contrary input at all. As such, the west is just braindead walking into disaster with no real idea of a goal or a purpose or an aim or any sense of how they want to achieve anything if they had an idea what anything was.

And, it’s not that they don’t care about destroying society. They simply haven’t thought about it. It’s not crossed their radar that their actions are destroying their own future. Nor, would they even entertain the idea that what they were doing could be bad.

They just carry on … braindead carrying on their walk to the destruction of our futures … causing people like Neil Oliver to start screaming: “we’re heading for disaster”, yet they will not listen.