The real global war is about money and who controls global trade, and therefore siphons off an unearned “cut” from all global trade.

Till recently, that was the western bankers (who are not aligned with the west, but merely reside here).

The trade was built on three things:

1. An efficient financial/banking system which means minimum profits … which was true a long time ago
2. Trust in that system, which takes decades if not centuries to establish
3. Habitual use.

After the west stole the Russian money, trust in the western “system” has been taken away. New technology has vastly reduced the costs of financial transactions, but the parasitic financiers still keep taking the same massive cut from every transaction.

So, the only thing keeping the current financial system afloat is “habitual use”. In other words, it is in free fall to collapse … where “free” is how fast habitual usage dies away and other institutions and systems arise to take its place.

The world has changed. The west is now just one of many and others, with far more efficient economies and more innovation and rapidly overtaking the west. They will in future be driving the financial systems and either western finaciers will collapse, or they will rapidly change seeing a sea change in profitability. The old days where everyone in the city of London drove a very expensive car are gone. That kind if money is never going to be around again.

In contrast, there will be a new class of wealthy people, far fewer than the city of London, but wealthy none-the-less, and they will be in the Brics financial centres. And, Russia will have won.

Ukraine was not the battle …. but the coke smoking leaders were clueless.

The image of three idiots on a train trying to hide their cocaine, really sums up the moronic nature of the modern west. Rich people out of touch with anything. That they were not all immediately forced to resign, also says a lot about the media, which is just a means to keep the same people in control, as those parasites destroy their hosts.

It is not just the climate scam that is coming to an end, but the power and privilege of the scum who have been ruling the west. Because whilst their corruption was tolerated so long as the “trickle down effect” left the population wealthy, that wealth is coming to an end, and with it the tolerance for the nasty politicians who have been abusing us.

Cuba

I was looking at how Cuba is being attacked, for its history of daring to stand up to the western parasites that rule the US. And, it started in an age, when the alternatives against each other were “people’s government” vs. the “bankers” (falsely “communism vs. capitalism”)

But, now the world is creating a new alternative banking system under BRICS.

The old parasite class that continues the totally evil attacks on Cuba, is now fighting a very new foe. One that is not “communist” but instead creating an alternative “capitalist” system to replace the parasitic capitalism. It is fire fighting fire, and the new capitalist system on the block is going to totally wipe the floor with the old one. Because the old one was just a very fat parasite on its western hosts as well as the rest of the globe.

That new capitalist system will totally change the dynamics of the globe. In 50 years time, the EU (which will suffer from being the EU as well as the new capitalist system) will probably look as impoverished as Cuba is now, whereas some countries that in the 20th century were deemed the “third world” will likely be very wealthy.

The US

It will be a very new world with the US seeing its position relegated substantially. Indeed, if it carries on its current behaviour of attempting to meddle in every other country globally and corrupt the governments to the will of the US rather than their own people, I can see the US being non-stop attacked for the next century until it is a feint shadow of its former self.

The US is going to find it harder than any other country to adapt to the new world, because it has nothing to gain (the US is basically a parasite of the rest of the world, sucking up wealth, and that is going to come to an end). And, it doesn’t have a culture that tolerates defeat … which is what is happening.

The UK

Power in the UK is going to shift dramatically away from London and the SE. That is not going to go down well with those who used to have power. But, there isn’t a lot they can do about it but move.

That doesn’t mean the rest of the country will do well, but the relative decline compared to the rest of the world, may be slow enough and erratic enough, not to be a great cause of tension … unlike London and the SE.

The EU

The division lines in the EU will grow and grow. Whether it falls apart, or simply ceases to have much meaning as a body, doesn’t really matter, because the net effect will be the same. The EU was bad for business, and Europe’s future is not under the thumb of totalitarian Eurocrats.

Wars

Many wars, indeed perhaps all modern wars, have had US involvement egging them on. The US’ power to do that, and the willingness of the rest of the world to tolerate that behaviour by the US is coming to an end.

But, just because the US was stirring the pot, doesn’t mean the conflicts would not eventually have come to the boil. The US’ involvement was to steer the conflict towards its own (bankers) advantage.

So, if the US ceased to exist one day, yes the world would see a period of peace and stability that it hasn’t ever seen before, but eventually, strife is likely to return. But, perhaps not at the current level of genocidal regimes like Israel.

Israel

Is the neighbour that no one wants, and keeps pushing and shoving everyone else saying “and what are you going to do about it”. Eventually, one or all their neighbours will solve the problem by kicking them out of the middle east. And as we move toward the new future, nothing is helping the Israelis. I just cannot see any other future. They openly commit genocide and openly corrupt numerous western governments and have no moral scruples about doing anything. They just do not have a long term future where they are. But, to be blunt: not my problem. They made their own ant’s nest, and now they can sleep in it as long as they are able.

Yes they will get their corrupt stooges in the west to attempt to help, but mass immigration to depopulate the middle east didn’t have the intended effect and instead now severely limits the ability of their stooges to help Israelis commit more genocide.

Brics at war … strange?

India … strangely a war breaks out
Iran … strangely the US wants to go to war with them
China …. strangely the US wants to go to war with them
Russia … strangely the US is at war with with Ukraine
S.Africa … about to strangely be at war once the CIA manufacture the conflict.

Every country that dares to oppose the the US … strangely ends up in a war created by well funded groups creating mischief. Don’t tell me the US isn’t behind almost every modern war!

There is an old Irish saying: “If I wanted to get there, I wouldn’t start from here”. So it is with the Ukraine conflict. The west has completely botched up. Russia will never trust the west again, so is is seriously doubtful any “deal” is possible, because a deal requires trust in the other side, and the EU and US do not deserve any trust at all.

Putting it simply, if you say “Nato not one inch further west” and then deliberately undermine regimes to push the Nato expansion up to the border of Russia, you are not in any sense worth trusting at all.

I do not believe a “deal” is possible. Instead, Russia will continue with the conflict until it imposes on Ukraine a peace that it can police, one that doesn’t require any co-operation or reliance on the EU to do anything … except not to go to war.

Moreover, the scale of lies in the western media is such as to make it impossible for Russia to agree to anything without first demonstrating the lies were lies. Which, means achieving something so concrete that no lie is big enough to hide it. The success of Russia does not require the acquiescence of the lying western media, they just cannot help reporting Russia’s success.

As such, the quickest route to peace is the collapse of all western support for Ukraine … which is going to happen sooner or later, just later means a lot more deaths.

Back when Google and their ilk, made it very difficult to campaign against the green insanity, I realised that if you cannot stop the madness, the second best thing was to have as much of the madness as possible all in one go. So, I stopped campaigning. Which given my online presence, was a sizeable proportion of the spearhead, and so the green goblins, thought they had won.

Now, I have not seen a positive thing said about the Green crap for months and so we have Reform who are strongly against it and now looking like it may well become the next government.

It seems to have worked!

Indeed, even the green nutters seem to be hating green, such is their loathing of the green crap in reality.

Happening

There are people who need a 4×4 vehicle, because they work in the country or have to go along some appalling road to get to their house. And, if they have money I can see the point of a Range Rover rather than a better, more comfortable car.

Then there are the people who just want to burn money to show off. The petrol heads, who want a “better than anyone else’s car”. Who will want the fastest, or biggest, or most in your face bit of nonsense.

Then there are the dim eco-nutters, who want electric because they have been told that “electric” is good for the environment (wrong). But, if they are going down that route, then then need the smallest CHEAPEST vehicle that they can cope with and ideally none. Cheap, because anything that adds prices creates CO2, and if they want to reduce CO2, they have to go for cheap. So, they will get a tiny car with batteries … no frills, no performance … indeed, they really should get a bicycle or walk.

And, then there are the utterly absurd brainwashed urban idiots who get “Electric” Range Rovers. It’s the combination of the absurd. The most unecological bit of garbage: a big, heavy, fuel consuming bit of “in your face I don’t care about the environment one bit” … for eco-loons?

It’s like someone getting a clown nose as beauty treatment. You either get a clown nose .. or you get beauty treatment. Or getting fit … by eating icecream.

Only the totally completely dimwitted brainwashed get an electric Rangerover. I might allow an executive … who is forced to get a “electric car” for pure marketing purposes, taking an electric one. But no one in their right mind wants an electric Rangerover when they have a choice of a proper car.

Sorry! We fucked up.

It turned out that most of what we were being told by the legacy media is blatant lies. From “peaceful” Israel to the cause of most wars in the world (the US), we were told a pack of lies.

And, then the internet came along, and the old media could no longer hide the fact they were lying to us. And we all lived happily ever after. NO! Well, at this stage it doesn’t look like it.

Instead of admitting they were liars, and mending their ways, what has happened is the media doubled their efforts with bigger and bigger lies, and at the same time more and more censorship and draconian behaviour by government. Continue reading →

Legal cases have now been opened which look like they stand a very good chance of succeeding. Let’s hope the criminals in the US get their comeuppance, followed swiftly by the same type of criminals in the UK.

These criminal referrals are accusing them of things such as murder, mass negligent homicide, abuse, fraud, kidnapping, battery and even terrorism

This is one of the first sections in a book I was writing on how to survive a nuclear exchange. The book was only intended for my own family and a few close friends … and only to be sent to them if it looked like a nuclear war was likely. And, only because, given how relevant it is to my own knowledge base, I felt I ought to have an answer, if they did ask me for advice … and I knew how I would feel if I had nothing to say.

2.1The flash (first seconds)

Fig 1: Relative heat intensity of the flash over relative time (seconds). The time is approximately in seconds for a 1mt explosion. Larger explosions last longer, with each 10fold increase in size there is a 3fold increase in length.

If there were an unexpected nuclear attack, the first anyone would know of the explosion, is an extremely bright, but totally silent, flash of intense heat and light.

DO NOT LOOK TOWARD THE FLASH!

If the first thing you know about a nuclear explosion is the intense light, then you must hit the ground, face down, immediately. Don’t look at the flash. Hit the ground and close your eyes.

If you are still exposed to the heat, cover bare skin and try to get to shade. If you have even a few second’s warning use this to get behind cover so you are not exposed to the flash.

Rationale: The reason to follow this advice is that many of the survivors of the atomic bomb in Japan mention that they had been taught to to drop to the ground this and that is what they did. The reason this works is that in a nuclear explosion anyone who is exposed to the flash could suffer extreme burns. As fig 1 shows, most of the heat energy of the initial flash energy arrives at the beginning. For a 1mt explosion, a third of the heat arrives within 1second.

With a reaction time of 0.3seconds, and a time for gravity to bring a person to the ground of 0.6seconds, the fastest anyone can “hit the deck” is about a second. So for a 1mt a third of the injury from the flash occurs before you have any time to react. Think about it for a second, choose to move and not drop, and you’ve doubled your potential injuries. You cannot afford to wait. There is no time to think. There is no time to weigh up the options. Your best hope is to use the fact that the closer you are to the ground, the more shielding you get. Because even plants, walls, chairs, desks, cars on the street, even small changes in the surface will shield you. You could reduce your exposure by 70% which would change third degree burns into something more akin to bad sun burn. If you think about it for even one second, you have lost the opportunity to make a substantial impact. If you start running, you will never get anywhere quick enough to effectively reduce your exposure to the initial flash.

My comment

After a discussion on another forum about the best approach and whether a “table” would provide protection I made this comment:

It’s an extremely difficult problem, because any response has to be done extremely quickly, so basically “drilled” and done without thought. I took the approach of “what action can make the most impact in improving survivability for the most people”. And, what most people can do, is reduce their exposure to IR, which will cause third degree burns (likely to lead to a slow death). The other key thing is to preserve sight. Because anyone blinded by the flash is far more likely to die afterwards.

Most people will be in one of three places: in bed, in their living room, or in an office. The ideal thing is to “look around for shade” … by which time they are blind. The only universal fall back that works in most places is “hit the deck and don’t look” (looking is quite hard when you’re on the deck)

If you take into account acceleration from gravity and reaction time, most people can be down on the ground in about 1sec. Ask them to think and that time probably doubles, doubling the initial injury. Hitting the deck doesn’t guarantee protection, but it doesn’t make the situation worse than not hitting the deck.

Once down you can then think … and then crawling or rolling into shade is the best way to move. But you have to be able to see to know where the shade is. And, if you did not hit the deck, you will have looked and won’t be able to see.

In the survival zones, the blast wave will arrive toward the end of the flash (or later). My bet, is that most people will be completely stunned by the event, partly blinded by the light, in severe pain from the IR burns and basically incapable of doing anything more. The blast wave will hit … the wave is a tsunami of debris that is flung horizontally at any wall or through any opening . So “hit the deck” is likely to be all most people actually do before the blast wave. The only general guidance is to be “low down”  (below a window sill) where there is generally more protection.

After the blast wave, comes the reverse suction … where everything is pulled back and then things begin to fall out the blast wave tsunami. At that point, there may be parts of walls carried by the blast wave falling through the roof. At any point after the blast wave arrives, a wall may collapse and you want something like a desk over your head.

Addendum … close to the detonation, you can reduce the high energy radiation exposure in various ways. You might also factor in that an air blast “looks down” and so a window sill isn’t a great  barrier. But close to the detonation, you are toast whatever you do. There is no point advising someone to do change their behaviour when it doesn’t change the outcome.

Because the US always uses shock and awe terror tactics, the US will target Russian cities. There is no doubt about that … and no doubt they will laugh and joke as they trigger the attack … if they believed they could get away with it.

As such, Russia has to target US cities. And because it knows there could be spies at all levels, it actually has to be targetting and ready to hit US cities, because if the US knew the Russians were not going to follow through with the threat, the US would immediately launch a nuclear strike against Russia (get them before they change their mind).

So, US is targetting Russian cities, and so Russia is targetting US cities (forget what the press say).

But, the UK is for all practical purposes just a offshore base of the US. The UK cannot independently fire the US’ missiles. An “Independent” deterrence is a joke. The UK will fire weapons when ordered to by the US … indeed, the weapons will fire irrespective of whether the UK government agree.

As such, the UK view on the matter is irrelevant to whether the nukes are fired. So, it does not matter if Russia targets UK cities of not … the UK politicians are irrelevant to the event. As such, Russia will ignore civilian targets and instead target military targets. There is no point wasting nukes on civilians, when there are plenty of military targets to take out. Indeed, why hit Manchester … when the nuke could go as a third or forth round to Washington?

Would Russia fire first?

This is an interesting question. The simple answer is that the answer is unknown, because if it were predictable, then the US would use that fact against Russia. Which means that Russia is quite prepared to fire first. But it is also prepared to only fire in response.

The simple rule, is that he who fires first has the advantage. Another simple rule, is he who can most speedily empty their cities and is prepared to take casualties from those who have not got out, has the advantage. My guess, is that the Russians would win such a race. The reason, is because they are a cohesive society that believe in Russia and they don’t have all the stupid ideas & divisions of the US. They are just pragmatic … and will probably exit in half the time of a similar sized US city.

However, the US administration are quite prepared to kill their own people. That will include a whole city. I’m not sure if the Russians are that ruthless.

How would the UK do …. you have got to be joking. Russians will probably leave within a few hours. The US within a couple of days. London would take about a month to exit … and all most of them would do is go to another city. And would the US care if British cities might be hit? LOL

However, my guess is that the Russians have a detailed set of decision criteria which decides if they fire. Probably not written down, not even known to just one person. But, they will have worked out how best to respond and how to make known or hide those intentions at every step.

If Russia did fire, it would start by giving warnings. But it would finish without warning as a first strike. But, I do not believe it would ever launch a first strike unless severely provoked. But it may have been extremely close to that first strike at times during Ukraine. But, they will not make that known. Because they will not tell anyone how close they are to firing … until they fire.

The key criteria they will use is this: When the circumstances make it highly probable that whatever reasonable action Russia takes will lead to the US launching an attack on Russia. As soon as those conditions are met (from their perspective based on their intelligence, based on their interpretation of US intentions), they will launch a first strike.

There will not be any last warnings … there will be no signal that they are “very close” to launching a first strike. They will warn vehemently about the “unacceptability” of US actions (or its proxy), but never openly threaten a nuclear strike. Instead, if the US doesn’t back down and keeps pushing the issue so that a nuclear war seems inevitable (to the Russians) … the Russians will strike first.

Here “inevitable” means something very different in the Russian psychology. It is not the outcome tomorrow of the next debate or the next US scandal. Instead, it is their best assessment of what it going to happen in several months and even years. They will analyse US past behaviour and using their own modelling of US behaviour, then predict the likely outcome months, even years in the future.

So, to the US, it might appear that a nuclear conflict was something in the remote future … something where there was a lot of actions before anything like that was being considered (by them). In contrast, the Russians, may have decided, that based on past US behaviour, all roads lead to nuclear war.

Ukraine

That was why Ukraine was so dangerous. If at any point, the Russians could see that any course of action they took to secure their borders from nato was going to end up in an escalatory cycle of increasingly aggressive responses leading to nuclear war, they would not play that out. They would instead fire when escalation to nuclear appeared the only likely outcome (they would not back down …and allow Russia to be destroyed by the US/Nato).

They are not playing poker. They are not threatening the US. They are not bargaining peace. They are simply doing the most rational thing to secure Russia from US aggression. Most of the time that is not to fire nukes. But, if the best way to prevent the US doing to Russia what it did to Iraq is a first strike of nuclear weapons, I have no doubt the Russians will do that.

And, so, the only thing stopping a first strike, was the Russian perception of whether the US was prepared to accept Russia’s requirement that they leave Russia and its immediate neighbours alone. Something that during the Bidem regime, didn’t look at all likely.