A war is won when both sides see an end to the war as being more favourable than the alternative. As such whilst military gains might drive the decision, the key is a consensus on both sides, that the war should end.

The art of war is building coalitions. The smallest coalition is a group of soldiers who will lay down their lives for each other. The largest coalitions are nations who work together to support one side or other (or merely not to hamper). In this way, even the smallest army can defeat a mighty empire.

The key to winning a war is logistics, for although a battle can be won using the equipment carried to the battle, a war can only be won by feeding men and supplies to the front and regularly rotating men.

Rivers form the frontline in many conflicts, not necessarily because the river is hard to cross, but because a river makes it easy to demarks the territory of one side from the other. As such, because rivers are such obvious features even for the most remote and out of touch general, everyone can agree with the soldiers with their feet in the water, that they are crossing the frontline. Also, rivers naturally flow in valleys, and so from the high ground it is relatively easy to look on the clear ground of the river and see who is crossing.As such, irrespective of the ease of crossing, rivers can become entrenched as a clear barrier separating one side from and as such they can become an uncrossable line.

However frontlines do not exist. They are illusions created by those soldiers who have very little idea what is going on except as far as they can see, and the generals who have no idea what is happening on the ground. A soldier merely knows where they, or their immediate fellows, have been at risk. If they can articulate that risk as “moving from here to there” creates a serious risk of injury or death, that suggests a “barrier” and if that is between them and the known or expected location of enemy forces, then that can be described as a “frontline”. If the enemy also perceives the same increasing risk, then each side may describe areas as “their territory”. Once areas are perceived as “owned” that can increase the risk of moving from “one territory to another” and create an illusion of a “frontline”.

However, the “frontline” is not a single feature. Each section has its own perception of where they “cross into enemy territory”, one that is not necessarily the same as the enemy’s view of when they leave their “own territory”. The combination of each sections “frontline” might be a drawn as a single line on a map, but it is still a combination of different features and not a single feature.

AI is simply theft of other people’s work which is then modified and passed off as the work of “AI”. Or to put it another way: it is a way to destroy all free online information sources, because only those that charge for access will be able to block the AI from stealing ALL their content and passing it off as the “thoughts of Chairman AI”.

Which is why I no longer intend to put any factual content on this website. I do not intend to put anything on this website that would attract any AI thieves.

AI doesn’t like opinion, especially unreferenced viewpoints with no supporting evidence. It cannot cope with that. Humans can.

As I wrote in the previous article “the Trap” it was quite clear the Iran war was a trap for the US in that an oil crisis will cause the fall of the dollar and thus the US as a global power. Note: I no longer care about the US. It is actively engaged in genocide and the sooner it falls the better. So what happens to the US is not directly of interest, however the knock on effect to the UK is.

Now the timescale of that fall is becoming increasingly clear. Strategic stocks of oil are currently being used to cushion the US consumer from the costs of their insane president’s insane, genocidist policies. Yet, there are only limited reserves and at the current rate of usage, those reserves run out about July. With good luck and a fair wind, the fossil fuel oil crunch might take a few months more to really hit … so winter 2026/27.

That’s when inflation is going to start spiralling out of control. That’s when social discontent is really going to hit. That’s when we are likely to see power cuts and fuel shortages. It won’t take that long for the first big business casualties to appear, but this winter is not going to be a good time for anyone but the business undertakers.

Electric Milk Floats

Continue reading →

There’s a prevalent theme across the internet, with states that there are “powerful” people in the west intent on bringing down the system and replacing a bad system with something far worse.

So, for example, when we get the massive prices rises causes by the Epstein-Zionist-Trump wars, this is just part of the plan by these elites to destroy the west.

There are scumites (not elites)  trying to destroy the west

The first problem unpicking this narrative is that there are scumites in the west who are intent on doing things that will destroy the west. A notable example is the climate nutters who would happily kill the entire human race … but will settle for those in the west.

And then there are the digital enslavers, trying to control us all in their digital prisons. And, that too will so stifle innovate and sceptical thinking in the west that the west will collapse economically.

And, there are just the thugs like the Zionists who have a political goal and don’t care about the effect on the west … who as I pointed out, share the climate nutter’s ambition to destroy the western fossil fuel economy… because the use of fossil fuels is a problem for the Zionists and their takeover of the Middle East.

But it the intent a “new world order” replacing the current system with some totalitarian state?

Continue reading →

For a long time (since before Ukraine started) I’ve suspected that Russia and China had a long term plan to bring down the US. Key to that plan was enhancing non-western trade links (which needed US sanctions to help), and encouraging non-dollar transactions to turn the globe against the dollar.

Turning the world against the dollar, or in other terms ending the era of the “petro-dollar” where oil could only be bought in dollars, would end the use of the US dollar as a trading and reserve currency, and that would massively reduce the demand for the dollar, lead to a huge devaluation in the dollar and also mean the US could not longer fund itself by printing dollars for foreign goods (because the demand for dollars abroad soak up the extra dollars being printed at no almost no cost). That would suddenly hit the US’ ability to fund any government projects, making it hugely expensive for the US to buy any foreign goods, and basically the value of anything in the US would drop like a stone.

But, it takes a massive hit to break the confidence of US markets and turn a believe if “never ending growth” into the “doom and gloom” of “it’s all gone wrong”.

So, however I looked at it, their plan needed a “trigger” to cause the US and US-Aligned countries to go into a deep recession. Looking at history, the only obvious attack point was to try to trigger an oil crisis.

So, before the Iran war was started by the Zionists, it was soon pretty obvious what was happening. But, I said it was started by the Zionists, so how does Russia/China start a war started by the Zionists? The answer is simple: the Russians/Chines/Iranians/etc. spread “intelligence” that cannot be made public, yet incites the US-Zionists to go to war. And, let’s be honest, Trump is not the smartest cookie in the jar. He’s easily manipulated and it didn’t need to be that sophisticated to cause that idiot to go to war.

So, Xi, Putin and the Iranians set a trap. An extremely well prepared and well stocked trap, that meant the US-Zionists believed from “intelligence” that Iran was going to fall in a few days, and they no doubt don’t have a clue that the Iranians have massive military, financial, food and other support, all stockpiled so that Iran can easily outlast the US and trigger the oil crisis.

So, I can see through all the hot air and huff and puff of Trump. He pretends to hold the “better hand” (because he sees it all like a game of poker), yet I know the Iranians have the upper hand. Xi and Putin probably know every word Trump tells anyone, and so know exactly what he is thinking, and they know how he is going to behave, and they know how those around him are going to behave. And, I think Xi and Putin will already have copies of all the Epstein files, and they know who is and who is not vulnerable in the US regime. And no doubt, in the guise of being “Zionists supporters”, Xi and Putin are also putting pressing on US politicians to e.g. “go to war against Iran”.

That is why government corruption stinks … because it can be used by everyone and sooner or later it is going to be used by your worst enemies. The Zionists are just parasites on the US, but there are others who want to destroy the west. The Zionists through their blackmail scam, undoubtedly opened the door to Russian and Chinese intelligence as well. The Epstein-Zionist swamp, is being used to destroy the US. And, with the UK being a huge lender to the US … that means the UK collapses as well (And Putin laughs his head off at the stupidity of the “Anglo Saxons”).

The Di is cast

However, that is all now the past. I did protest the stupidity and immorality of the Iranian war, but it was clear Trump was never going to listen to anyone and so he enthusiastically jumped into the trap.

Now Trump is caught in the trap of the Zionist making and it is undoubtedly designed to have no exit** except a collapse in the US economy and then the US dollar.

So, it’s a bit like being a passenger on the Titanic. We know the boat is going down. We know the “captain” is stark raving bonkers and his only idea is to go fooll steam ahead and pretend the boat isn’t sinking.

Obviously there are many people who firstly have no clue the boat is sinking, or if they do, they imagine there is some way off this life-boat free “Trump-Class Cruise liner”.

So, do I have a cunning plan? No! All I’ve been doing is acclimatising myself to ice-laden water for years. If there is a way out, I will find it, but for now, I’m just waiting and listening …. isn’t the orchestra good!

** The final exit is the collapse in the US. A well made trap has many illusionary exits that appear to lead to freedom, but are designed to take the victim back into the trap.

Many years ago I set out to find the origin of Christianity in Britain. The hard evidence is found in Roman remains with the repeated use of what is referred to as a “Chi Rho” symbol. But then later we get the “Celtic Church” and to understand how those two were related I knew I had to understand the “Celtic Church”. Eventually I realised I had no idea what the “Celtic Church” was, because there was no clear definition of what was “Celtic” and what was “Roman”. So, after a lot of confusing research, I decided that I might make progress if I understood who the “Celts” were, because surely the Celtic church was simply the Christianity adopted by the Celts.

That led me to try to find these “Celts” of Britain. I put “Celt” in quotation marks, because after years of research, looking at every ancient text and translating what it actually said, I found not a single reference to the “Celts” in Britain.

The real Celts did exist. They were one part of the Gauls, and for a time they were so dominant that the Romans referred to all the Gauls as “Celts”. But at the time of the first detailed account of this people, the real Celts were just one of three nations within the overall Gallic peoples. A group that almost exactly matches the French speaking areas. So for all reasonably purposes they are the French.

The only evidence for “Celts” in Britain, is that about 150BC a group called the Belgae invaded the SE of England. (Hence the name “Belgium” … which if we take the French part, is a good clue to where they lived). These Belgae use coinage from Gaul and brought in some other “continental” customs like burials, but they weren’t the Celts, so anything they brought in is either “Belgic” or perhaps “Gallic”. It isn’t “Celtic”.

The only actual invasion of “Celts” occurred when the Normans and Bretons … which included much of the Celtic area invaded in 1066. So the Normans might be described as “Celts”, although you won’t hear that.

Every other mention of “Celt” in Britain, is a non Celtic group which has been falsely translated to be “Celt” in some way. So, although you might find an English translation implying some “Celtic” connection to Britain, that is something added into the translation.

The faking of the British Celts

It turns out the first serious mention of the “Celts” of Britain was when that a Welsh man … I think an academic at Oxford … about 1707 falsely translated a French work book about the megalithic antiquities of France and Britain and added the word “Celts” into the title.

Then, despite the absence of evidence this fake “history” spread, so that today anyone who points out the fact that there is no evidence for the Celts in Britain is treated as mad. Indeed, you might think they have a point, because isn’t all the “Celtic” things found in Britain “proof” that they were Celts. Well, it might be, if it were true that if you go to the area of Normandy-Brittany where we know there were Celts at the time of Caesar, that we found the highest concentration anywhere of the “Celtic” artefacts that are now used to “prove” there were “Celts”. But, the converse is true. There are almost “Celtic” finds in the area known to be inhabited by the real Celts. Thus everything that is now called “Celtic” has nothing to do with the real historical Celts.

Who would invent this myth

For a long time I suspected the French were behind the myth of the British Celts, because the French have a law making it illegal to carry out such research in France so they clearly understand the danger of creating “separatist identities”. So, with the Jacobite revolutions, I strongly suspect they were encouraging the development of “anti-English” identities in Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

However, it doesn’t fit. Because I have found not a whiff of pushback from the English. For example, 3 out of the 5 early lives of St.Patrick point to him being born in Strathclyde, and Gildas came from Strathclyde … where we had the Antonine wall and Dumbarton Rock … aka Barton or perhaps Badon … the location of I think Arthur’s last battle. So Strathclyde has a lot of early history and was a early centre of learning which strong connections to the Roman empire … and that is the REAL history of Scotland.

Yet there is no interest in Scotland … or anywhere … of this real history of Scotland. Why?

And that was the clue. 1707, when the Celtic myth starts, is also the start of the “tartan tat” version of Scottish history. A history that was Romanticised or perhaps “satirised” by (w)alter Scot and all the other Cronies of the court of Queen Victoria. That’s when Scotland gets Irish “whisky”, Northumberland “Haggis”, European “Bagpipes”, when we start seeing the “tartan” identity, the “skirt” based kilt replacing the “Roman toga” based Kilt of history. That’s when the OS starts giving every Scots place (Scots is a close relative of Old English) a fake Gaelic name. That’s when we start seeing all the fake Gaelic etymologies like “Skye” (easily translated using the Norse word meaning cloudy). Indeed most early names of the Islands of Scotland are Norse in origin.

Tartan tat … isn’t just what is sold in the tourist shops … it is the whole “history” of Scotland, which was fabricated at the time, or at least by the time, of Queen Victoria.

What I am (now) saying: is that the Celtic myth wasn’t invented by someone trying to destroy the Union, it was invented by those trying to destroy the real identity of Scotland and replace it with a mythical non-serious “identity”. In other words to devalue the real Scottish history and replace it with a fairytale history that lacked all credibility.

That is why the English academics don’t push back on the fake identity of Scotland invented from 1707 onward. Because being a fake fairytale rather than serious scholarly study, it makes the Scottish identity seem like a fairytale and lacking all serious credibility. That lack of rigour in the romanticised version of Scotland’s “history” undermines its credibility and that undermines the credibility of a distinct Scottish identity.

It also hides the real identity … one that was probably stolen as huge boxes of ancient texts were removed from Scotland to “safekeeping”** in England when James was taken by the English in exchange for increased power … now only hinted at by the odd strange fact like the life of St.Patrick or the Scottishness of the battles of Arthur.

So, rather than being encouraged to create division, the Celtic myth is being encouraged in order to undermine the credibility of Scottish history and thus a Scottish identity.

Finally!!! I understand why the crap persists … it’s encouraged by the English!

**I am speculating. This is why:

After the first crusade in 1066 when William the Bastard led the Roman pope’s army to squash the British church, he then burnt down all the libraries that used to contain all the texts about the early British church … a church that predates that of Rome. My hunch is that the texts were removed first and it is quite possible that they remain somewhere. Perhaps they were kept by William in case he ever needed to “prove” the authority of the English church over that of Rome. Or, perhaps they were moved to Rome and are now in some secret vault.

The same seemed to have happened about the Old Pictish Kingdom of Strathclyde. It only now exists in the most obscure references. A king list, a very few place names that are “Pictish” and some odd facts, like Strathclyde being the birthplace of St.Patrick and Gildas. Then along came the Irish and they obliterated that history … or does it still exist in some vault somewhere?

So, was the real history of Scotland stolen by the English? Were all the key historical texts removed from the libraries and transported to England and now lie in some vault?

The problem with the “Vault” theory, is that ancient texts deteriorate even in the best of conditions, and the ones that survive are the ones that someone copies, thus rejuvenating the text and extending the life another century or more. But then that too deteriorates and eventually, if no one copies then, they are thrown away. That life can be very long in a dry climate, but in Britain, unless the room is actively heated, then the texts will be gone in a few centuries. So, ancient texts need money and resources to preserve them. And, it only needs one person to say: “we need the money/space” for something else, and the text is thrown out and the chain of preservation and copying is broken and the text is lost.

So, yes I do think it is very likely important texts were stolen, but I’m very dubious that those texts will still be around.

If I compared two maps from a year ago or perhaps two, to the present “front line” in Ukraine there would be large areas that have moved from control by the illegitimate … long past his term … never properly elected … “Zelensky” to the oh so fluffy and cuddly Russians. And, there has also been huge numbers of dead.

(If I sound annoyed by the insanity of all the pointless deaths, it is because I am)

However the real story is not of change, but of the slowest possible advance consistent with regular updates into the Russian media of “yet another settlement” (of a few houses) being captured. There is not the slightest evidence of any rush by the Russians. That could be explained by “slow gradual pressure wins”. But I think the truth is that Putin wants to draw out the war as long as possible, because the war is an economic disaster sucking the lifeblood out of the EU, and Putin is loving every minute of it.

Because it seems like the real aim of this war, has nothing to do with Ukraine, but instead it is to damage the EU … and the EU walked into the Russian trap. Now Iran has sprung the second part of that trap: the strangling of global energy supplies, which is going to hit the EU particularly hard, because it has done everything it can to end Russian oil supplies, end its own drilling for oil and gas, and … let’s just say the price Trump is going to ask for his support of the EU is quite green, and won’t land at all well with the Eurofascists.

So, my prediction is that the war is not going to end until the EU economy so fails, that it simply cannot sustain the funding to Zelensky. Then, when the EU has finally admitted its failure in Ukraine and it pulls the plug and stops supporting Ukraine … thereby ending the damage being done to the EU by the war, Putin will in a few weeks, take everything he ever planned to take, with minimal Russian losses and the war will be over.

My guess is that Putin will leave a huge chunk of Ukraine to join the EU, because he reckons that the Ukrainians in the EU, will do far more damage than Putin could achieve by any other means. And, to be blunt … he clearly doesn’t ever want them back in the Russian Federation.

The Eurofascists will be obliged to accept Ukraine … and that cost will likely be the final straw that causes the EU to split apart. So, in part Putin is preparing Ukraine to be the incendiary device to light the EU fires of discontent.

I told you so

May I just point out that I said the Ukrainians should sue for peace as soon as they started gaining land … was it three years ago and perhaps a million deaths? Whatever the timescale, I think I am now quite justified in saying “I told you so”.

(this text cannot be added to the previous articles as I am still having problems.)

Addendum

In the last article I said that the Zionists had to wait 40 years before the Nut Zero nutters reduced European dependency on middle eastern oil so that the leverage of closing the Straits of Hormuz was reduced enough … and Trump started drilling oil reducing US dependency.

However, why now? Why not wait a bit longer, because quite obviously the sudden “knee Jerk” action has been a disaster for the Zionists.

That suggests there is a strong reason requiring haste. I can think of two reasons for that

Political

It is possible that having got their Epstein blackmailable president in power with control over both US houses, that the Zionists wanted to make hay whilst they had total control over the US. In other words, they feared a new president who would either repress US oil production … thus making them vulnerable to the closure of the Straits of Hormuz, or they would be so persuasive of the pointlessness of the global warming scam, that the Europeans would stop their insanity and ditch Nut Zero.

Trump is the ideal clown … constantly ruffling the feathers of the Europeans, whilst pumping out oil. He is the golden condom that lays the Golden genocidal turd … and with Stammer about to go, and Trump about to cause a collapse of the Republican vote in the mid-terms, the Zionists had to go as soon as they had control over Trump as president.

Climate

The other possibility is that the US has secret metrics of global temperature which are compiled without all the adjustments to create the warming they use to bamboozle the morons in the EU.

And, my hypothesis, would be that these are showing a strong cooling trend. And, it would appear that these are forecast to continue, if this hypothesis were correct, it would imply that those with the secret global temperature metric, also have a forecast model, presumably using the sun. That model indicates substantial cooling.

The Next Ice-age?

We are already overdue for the start of the next ice-age by about 2000 years. As such, using hand waving guesses, I estimate a 50:50 chance of a start to the next ice-age within the next 1000 years. Or 5% within any 100 year period. Or to put that in human terms, I estimate a 5% chance of a 90% reduction in all life on earth, including human, within the next 100 years.

If we are about to see rapid and substantial cooling, then that could trigger the next ice-age. Let’s say it’s a once in a lifetime event. And that there’s a 50:50 chance of it triggering the ice-age. That suggests about a 1-4% chance of a new ice-age starting “imminently”. In other words, within the next ~decade, we have the same chance as would normally be risked throughout a whole lifetime.

Thus, if my hypothesis were correct, it would make it amongst the most serious risks faced by everyone on the planet. And, the only reason I can even guess that risk occurs, is because I know the temperature record is fake, and I’ve just realised that it wasn’t just the green fascists who were being the faking, but also the US republicans. So all my assumptions that Trump would “reveal the truth” was a total load of genocidal codswallop.

The good news: a 95-100% probability the next ice-age won’t start in the next 20 years.

In 20 years, I will know either way. Of course, the risk could be a lot higher … or lower. But, if you do die within the next two decades from the effects of global cooling, I will apologise in advance for underestimating the risk.

This is a response to a comment on Roger’s blog, which would be too long to post.

Summary

If you have ever wondered why there was never a push back against the “left wing” campaign for Nut Zero, the answer is simple. There was an equally ruthless “right wing” or “Zionist” campaign supporting Nut Zero, but they had the sense to keep their activities silent and let the left take the blame for Nut Zero.

The result of this strong support from both the left and right/zionists is that the US is the hot bed of the insane “Global warming” cult, because that cult is supported by the right just as much as the left in the US.

The science never mattered. It was never about the science. It was always a political campaign to end the use of middle eastern oil and gas dressed up as “science”. Continue reading →

As I predicted, Starmer is proving absolutely toxic to the Liebour party. He is destroying whatever hope they have left of ever forming another government. But, it’s not Starmer that did it. It is the party that allowed, even enabled, a man like Starmer, the participant of genocide and illegal wars, to get to power.

So I don’t care if Starmer goes. He is toxic and the longer he stays the less chance that Liebour will ever have power again. And so, they too are going the way of the old Whigs.

But what if they pick a new leader? A new leader who can see what Nut Zero and Zionist wars is doing to the economy … which makes a wipe-out of Liebour at the next election ineviable.

So, it is just possible that a new Liebour leader, hoping for a honeymoon effect, will call a new election. Anyone stupid enough to be picked by the Zionists who control Liebour, will probably be stupid enough to believe that they have the “magic” touch to get the Zionist controlled media to love them.

However, will it wash with the gullible British public? I’m not sure I care. I feel like a slave on a plantation watching the masters fight. As long as they are fighting each other, they’re not whipping us. But heaven forbid any of us plebs who get caught smiling!

Hoisted on their own lies

Of course, as far as the Epstein-Zionists are controlled, destroying the left would be a desirable outcome. Which in their minds would mean destroying Liebour. So, keeping Starmer in position will end up with a “right” and thus “pro-Genocide” party … and least that is very likely how they think.

But the Zionist left versus right (always an Epstein Zionist in control) politics is a thing of the past. The public are gullible, but they aren’t fools and despite the most totalitarian brave-new world levels of censorship and control, that system now leaks like a sieve and the truth is getting out. The old order is falling apart, with no clear idea of what is to come. But I suspect it will be hated by those who thrived in the old order where the Epstein Zionist elite supported the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the original chosen people of Palestine.