There’s a prevalent theme across the internet, with states that there are “powerful” people in the west intent on bringing down the system and replacing a bad system with something far worse.

So, for example, when we get the massive prices rises causes by the Epstein-Zionist-Trump wars, this is just part of the plan by these elites to destroy the west.

There are scumites (not elites)  trying to destroy the west

The first problem unpicking this narrative is that there are scumites in the west who are intent on doing things that will destroy the west. A notable example is the climate nutters who would happily kill the entire human race … but will settle for those in the west.

And then there are the digital enslavers, trying to control us all in their digital prisons. And, that too will so stifle innovate and sceptical thinking in the west that the west will collapse economically.

And, there are just the thugs like the Zionists who have a political goal and don’t care about the effect on the west … who as I pointed out, share the climate nutter’s ambition to destroy the western fossil fuel economy… because the use of fossil fuels is a problem for the Zionists and their takeover of the Middle East.

But it the intent a “new world order” replacing the current system with some totalitarian state?

If anyone were ever insane enough to go ahead with the climate nutters’ plans and destroy the fossil fuel economy, they would indeed need to create a digital prison, end human righs and basically start murdering the population. However, just because that is the outcome, doesn’t mean it is the intention. Likewise the Zionists would happily kill 7billion people, if they got in the way of their cult. But that is not their intention or aim.

Some evil force pushing a “New World Order” … is very easy to believe and very seductive if you never ask any questions, but as soon as you start being sceptical, things look very different.

What is different about the current bunch of idiots pushing their own Utopian nightmares compared to every other nutter in history who has pushed an insane Utopian nightmare?

Not a lot. There are always such people, and indeed, if I consider my own musings over the years, I have often wish to have total control to implement my own vision of a better society. It’s just human nature.

What has changed, is that through the internet, the more insane ideas and people are getting heard about, especially if they are some crazy prof in a stupid suit who claims to be in a position of power. It can all be dressed up to look, not like a crazy prof, but very sinister.

Is the “New World Order” narrative what it seems?

It has often occurred to me, that the people who want to see the end of the west, are almost certainly going to want to pin the blame for the fall of the west on the crackpot scumites who dress in funny suits and try to imprison us in their digital prisons. So, they would have a lot of incentive to encourage this “New world order” narrative, such that when the west does start falling, the populace takes out their anger on the scumite in power.

Obviously I have no way to prove it, and to be frank, I’ve been wrong many times before. However perhaps this time the scumite who want to put us all in digital prisons and end our human rights, might actually not be the “bad guys”.

So, what am I going to do about it? Absolutely nothing. If the scumite get blamed for the fall of the west, then frankly, they deserve everything they get**. They are the most corrupt, arrogant, bunch of thugs attacking the people they are supposed to serve. If the people rise against them because of some fabricated story about them pushing a “new world order”, it may be the wrong reason to rise, but after all they have done to destroy British society, is a lot less than they deserve.

Reasons they deserve it (in no particular order)

1. The BBC lies
2. The climate lies
3. The covid lies
4. The covid prison
5. The attack on UK industry
6. The end of human rights
7. Digital prisons
8. The constant attacks on the British
9. The never ending political attacks against everything that was once good
10. The destruction of the altruistic internet
11. The brainwashing of the population
12. Their total contempt for the electorate
13. The Epstein corruption
14. Supporting genocide and ethnic cleansing
15. All the things I’ve forgotten to mention, because there are just so many ways they have treated us all & the truth with contempt
16. The end of intellectual property (now that AI is allowed to steal all content and pass it off as their own).
17. The end of fair trials and the general corruption of the legal “system”

For a long time (since before Ukraine started) I’ve suspected that Russia and China had a long term plan to bring down the US. Key to that plan was enhancing non-western trade links (which needed US sanctions to help), and encouraging non-dollar transactions to turn the globe against the dollar.

Turning the world against the dollar, or in other terms ending the era of the “petro-dollar” where oil could only be bought in dollars, would end the use of the US dollar as a trading and reserve currency, and that would massively reduce the demand for the dollar, lead to a huge devaluation in the dollar and also mean the US could not longer fund itself by printing dollars for foreign goods (because the demand for dollars abroad soak up the extra dollars being printed at no almost no cost). That would suddenly hit the US’ ability to fund any government projects, making it hugely expensive for the US to buy any foreign goods, and basically the value of anything in the US would drop like a stone.

But, it takes a massive hit to break the confidence of US markets and turn a believe if “never ending growth” into the “doom and gloom” of “it’s all gone wrong”.

So, however I looked at it, their plan needed a “trigger” to cause the US and US-Aligned countries to go into a deep recession. Looking at history, the only obvious attack point was to try to trigger an oil crisis.

So, before the Iran war was started by the Zionists, it was soon pretty obvious what was happening. But, I said it was started by the Zionists, so how does Russia/China start a war started by the Zionists? The answer is simple: the Russians/Chines/Iranians/etc. spread “intelligence” that cannot be made public, yet incites the US-Zionists to go to war. And, let’s be honest, Trump is not the smartest cookie in the jar. He’s easily manipulated and it didn’t need to be that sophisticated to cause that idiot to go to war.

So, Xi, Putin and the Iranians set a trap. An extremely well prepared and well stocked trap, that meant the US-Zionists believed from “intelligence” that Iran was going to fall in a few days, and they no doubt don’t have a clue that the Iranians have massive military, financial, food and other support, all stockpiled so that Iran can easily outlast the US and trigger the oil crisis.

So, I can see through all the hot air and huff and puff of Trump. He pretends to hold the “better hand” (because he sees it all like a game of poker), yet I know the Iranians have the upper hand. Xi and Putin probably know every word Trump tells anyone, and so know exactly what he is thinking, and they know how he is going to behave, and they know how those around him are going to behave. And, I think Xi and Putin will already have copies of all the Epstein files, and they know who is and who is not vulnerable in the US regime. And no doubt, in the guise of being “Zionists supporters”, Xi and Putin are also putting pressing on US politicians to e.g. “go to war against Iran”.

That is why government corruption stinks … because it can be used by everyone and sooner or later it is going to be used by your worst enemies. The Zionists are just parasites on the US, but there are others who want to destroy the west. The Zionists through their blackmail scam, undoubtedly opened the door to Russian and Chinese intelligence as well. The Epstein-Zionist swamp, is being used to destroy the US. And, with the UK being a huge lender to the US … that means the UK collapses as well (And Putin laughs his head off at the stupidity of the “Anglo Saxons”).

The Di is cast

However, that is all now the past. I did protest the stupidity and immorality of the Iranian war, but it was clear Trump was never going to listen to anyone and so he enthusiastically jumped into the trap.

Now Trump is caught in the trap of the Zionist making and it is undoubtedly designed to have no exit** except a collapse in the US economy and then the US dollar.

So, it’s a bit like being a passenger on the Titanic. We know the boat is going down. We know the “captain” is stark raving bonkers and his only idea is to go fooll steam ahead and pretend the boat isn’t sinking.

Obviously there are many people who firstly have no clue the boat is sinking, or if they do, they imagine there is some way off this life-boat free “Trump-Class Cruise liner”.

So, do I have a cunning plan? No! All I’ve been doing is acclimatising myself to ice-laden water for years. If there is a way out, I will find it, but for now, I’m just waiting and listening …. isn’t the orchestra good!

** The final exit is the collapse in the US. A well made trap has many illusionary exits that appear to lead to freedom, but are designed to take the victim back into the trap.

Many years ago I set out to find the origin of Christianity in Britain. The hard evidence is found in Roman remains with the repeated use of what is referred to as a “Chi Rho” symbol. But then later we get the “Celtic Church” and to understand how those two were related I knew I had to understand the “Celtic Church”. Eventually I realised I had no idea what the “Celtic Church” was, because there was no clear definition of what was “Celtic” and what was “Roman”. So, after a lot of confusing research, I decided that I might make progress if I understood who the “Celts” were, because surely the Celtic church was simply the Christianity adopted by the Celts.

That led me to try to find these “Celts” of Britain. I put “Celt” in quotation marks, because after years of research, looking at every ancient text and translating what it actually said, I found not a single reference to the “Celts” in Britain.

The real Celts did exist. They were one part of the Gauls, and for a time they were so dominant that the Romans referred to all the Gauls as “Celts”. But at the time of the first detailed account of this people, the real Celts were just one of three nations within the overall Gallic peoples. A group that almost exactly matches the French speaking areas. So for all reasonably purposes they are the French.

The only evidence for “Celts” in Britain, is that about 150BC a group called the Belgae invaded the SE of England. (Hence the name “Belgium” … which if we take the French part, is a good clue to where they lived). These Belgae use coinage from Gaul and brought in some other “continental” customs like burials, but they weren’t the Celts, so anything they brought in is either “Belgic” or perhaps “Gallic”. It isn’t “Celtic”.

The only actual invasion of “Celts” occurred when the Normans and Bretons … which included much of the Celtic area invaded in 1066. So the Normans might be described as “Celts”, although you won’t hear that.

Every other mention of “Celt” in Britain, is a non Celtic group which has been falsely translated to be “Celt” in some way. So, although you might find an English translation implying some “Celtic” connection to Britain, that is something added into the translation.

The faking of the British Celts

It turns out the first serious mention of the “Celts” of Britain was when that a Welsh man … I think an academic at Oxford … about 1707 falsely translated a French work book about the megalithic antiquities of France and Britain and added the word “Celts” into the title.

Then, despite the absence of evidence this fake “history” spread, so that today anyone who points out the fact that there is no evidence for the Celts in Britain is treated as mad. Indeed, you might think they have a point, because isn’t all the “Celtic” things found in Britain “proof” that they were Celts. Well, it might be, if it were true that if you go to the area of Normandy-Brittany where we know there were Celts at the time of Caesar, that we found the highest concentration anywhere of the “Celtic” artefacts that are now used to “prove” there were “Celts”. But, the converse is true. There are almost “Celtic” finds in the area known to be inhabited by the real Celts. Thus everything that is now called “Celtic” has nothing to do with the real historical Celts.

Who would invent this myth

For a long time I suspected the French were behind the myth of the British Celts, because the French have a law making it illegal to carry out such research in France so they clearly understand the danger of creating “separatist identities”. So, with the Jacobite revolutions, I strongly suspect they were encouraging the development of “anti-English” identities in Scotland, Wales and Ireland.

However, it doesn’t fit. Because I have found not a whiff of pushback from the English. For example, 3 out of the 5 early lives of St.Patrick point to him being born in Strathclyde, and Gildas came from Strathclyde … where we had the Antonine wall and Dumbarton Rock … aka Barton or perhaps Badon … the location of I think Arthur’s last battle. So Strathclyde has a lot of early history and was a early centre of learning which strong connections to the Roman empire … and that is the REAL history of Scotland.

Yet there is no interest in Scotland … or anywhere … of this real history of Scotland. Why?

And that was the clue. 1707, when the Celtic myth starts, is also the start of the “tartan tat” version of Scottish history. A history that was Romanticised or perhaps “satirised” by (w)alter Scot and all the other Cronies of the court of Queen Victoria. That’s when Scotland gets Irish “whisky”, Northumberland “Haggis”, European “Bagpipes”, when we start seeing the “tartan” identity, the “skirt” based kilt replacing the “Roman toga” based Kilt of history. That’s when the OS starts giving every Scots place (Scots is a close relative of Old English) a fake Gaelic name. That’s when we start seeing all the fake Gaelic etymologies like “Skye” (easily translated using the Norse word meaning cloudy). Indeed most early names of the Islands of Scotland are Norse in origin.

Tartan tat … isn’t just what is sold in the tourist shops … it is the whole “history” of Scotland, which was fabricated at the time, or at least by the time, of Queen Victoria.

What I am (now) saying: is that the Celtic myth wasn’t invented by someone trying to destroy the Union, it was invented by those trying to destroy the real identity of Scotland and replace it with a mythical non-serious “identity”. In other words to devalue the real Scottish history and replace it with a fairytale history that lacked all credibility.

That is why the English academics don’t push back on the fake identity of Scotland invented from 1707 onward. Because being a fake fairytale rather than serious scholarly study, it makes the Scottish identity seem like a fairytale and lacking all serious credibility. That lack of rigour in the romanticised version of Scotland’s “history” undermines its credibility and that undermines the credibility of a distinct Scottish identity.

It also hides the real identity … one that was probably stolen as huge boxes of ancient texts were removed from Scotland to “safekeeping”** in England when James was taken by the English in exchange for increased power … now only hinted at by the odd strange fact like the life of St.Patrick or the Scottishness of the battles of Arthur.

So, rather than being encouraged to create division, the Celtic myth is being encouraged in order to undermine the credibility of Scottish history and thus a Scottish identity.

Finally!!! I understand why the crap persists … it’s encouraged by the English!

**I am speculating. This is why:

After the first crusade in 1066 when William the Bastard led the Roman pope’s army to squash the British church, he then burnt down all the libraries that used to contain all the texts about the early British church … a church that predates that of Rome. My hunch is that the texts were removed first and it is quite possible that they remain somewhere. Perhaps they were kept by William in case he ever needed to “prove” the authority of the English church over that of Rome. Or, perhaps they were moved to Rome and are now in some secret vault.

The same seemed to have happened about the Old Pictish Kingdom of Strathclyde. It only now exists in the most obscure references. A king list, a very few place names that are “Pictish” and some odd facts, like Strathclyde being the birthplace of St.Patrick and Gildas. Then along came the Irish and they obliterated that history … or does it still exist in some vault somewhere?

So, was the real history of Scotland stolen by the English? Were all the key historical texts removed from the libraries and transported to England and now lie in some vault?

The problem with the “Vault” theory, is that ancient texts deteriorate even in the best of conditions, and the ones that survive are the ones that someone copies, thus rejuvenating the text and extending the life another century or more. But then that too deteriorates and eventually, if no one copies then, they are thrown away. That life can be very long in a dry climate, but in Britain, unless the room is actively heated, then the texts will be gone in a few centuries. So, ancient texts need money and resources to preserve them. And, it only needs one person to say: “we need the money/space” for something else, and the text is thrown out and the chain of preservation and copying is broken and the text is lost.

So, yes I do think it is very likely important texts were stolen, but I’m very dubious that those texts will still be around.

If I compared two maps from a year ago or perhaps two, to the present “front line” in Ukraine there would be large areas that have moved from control by the illegitimate … long past his term … never properly elected … “Zelensky” to the oh so fluffy and cuddly Russians. And, there has also been huge numbers of dead.

(If I sound annoyed by the insanity of all the pointless deaths, it is because I am)

However the real story is not of change, but of the slowest possible advance consistent with regular updates into the Russian media of “yet another settlement” (of a few houses) being captured. There is not the slightest evidence of any rush by the Russians. That could be explained by “slow gradual pressure wins”. But I think the truth is that Putin wants to draw out the war as long as possible, because the war is an economic disaster sucking the lifeblood out of the EU, and Putin is loving every minute of it.

Because it seems like the real aim of this war, has nothing to do with Ukraine, but instead it is to damage the EU … and the EU walked into the Russian trap. Now Iran has sprung the second part of that trap: the strangling of global energy supplies, which is going to hit the EU particularly hard, because it has done everything it can to end Russian oil supplies, end its own drilling for oil and gas, and … let’s just say the price Trump is going to ask for his support of the EU is quite green, and won’t land at all well with the Eurofascists.

So, my prediction is that the war is not going to end until the EU economy so fails, that it simply cannot sustain the funding to Zelensky. Then, when the EU has finally admitted its failure in Ukraine and it pulls the plug and stops supporting Ukraine … thereby ending the damage being done to the EU by the war, Putin will in a few weeks, take everything he ever planned to take, with minimal Russian losses and the war will be over.

My guess is that Putin will leave a huge chunk of Ukraine to join the EU, because he reckons that the Ukrainians in the EU, will do far more damage than Putin could achieve by any other means. And, to be blunt … he clearly doesn’t ever want them back in the Russian Federation.

The Eurofascists will be obliged to accept Ukraine … and that cost will likely be the final straw that causes the EU to split apart. So, in part Putin is preparing Ukraine to be the incendiary device to light the EU fires of discontent.

I told you so

May I just point out that I said the Ukrainians should sue for peace as soon as they started gaining land … was it three years ago and perhaps a million deaths? Whatever the timescale, I think I am now quite justified in saying “I told you so”.

(this text cannot be added to the previous articles as I am still having problems.)

Addendum

In the last article I said that the Zionists had to wait 40 years before the Nut Zero nutters reduced European dependency on middle eastern oil so that the leverage of closing the Straits of Hormuz was reduced enough … and Trump started drilling oil reducing US dependency.

However, why now? Why not wait a bit longer, because quite obviously the sudden “knee Jerk” action has been a disaster for the Zionists.

That suggests there is a strong reason requiring haste. I can think of two reasons for that

Political

It is possible that having got their Epstein blackmailable president in power with control over both US houses, that the Zionists wanted to make hay whilst they had total control over the US. In other words, they feared a new president who would either repress US oil production … thus making them vulnerable to the closure of the Straits of Hormuz, or they would be so persuasive of the pointlessness of the global warming scam, that the Europeans would stop their insanity and ditch Nut Zero.

Trump is the ideal clown … constantly ruffling the feathers of the Europeans, whilst pumping out oil. He is the golden condom that lays the Golden genocidal turd … and with Stammer about to go, and Trump about to cause a collapse of the Republican vote in the mid-terms, the Zionists had to go as soon as they had control over Trump as president.

Climate

The other possibility is that the US has secret metrics of global temperature which are compiled without all the adjustments to create the warming they use to bamboozle the morons in the EU.

And, my hypothesis, would be that these are showing a strong cooling trend. And, it would appear that these are forecast to continue, if this hypothesis were correct, it would imply that those with the secret global temperature metric, also have a forecast model, presumably using the sun. That model indicates substantial cooling.

The Next Ice-age?

We are already overdue for the start of the next ice-age by about 2000 years. As such, using hand waving guesses, I estimate a 50:50 chance of a start to the next ice-age within the next 1000 years. Or 5% within any 100 year period. Or to put that in human terms, I estimate a 5% chance of a 90% reduction in all life on earth, including human, within the next 100 years.

If we are about to see rapid and substantial cooling, then that could trigger the next ice-age. Let’s say it’s a once in a lifetime event. And that there’s a 50:50 chance of it triggering the ice-age. That suggests about a 1-4% chance of a new ice-age starting “imminently”. In other words, within the next ~decade, we have the same chance as would normally be risked throughout a whole lifetime.

Thus, if my hypothesis were correct, it would make it amongst the most serious risks faced by everyone on the planet. And, the only reason I can even guess that risk occurs, is because I know the temperature record is fake, and I’ve just realised that it wasn’t just the green fascists who were being the faking, but also the US republicans. So all my assumptions that Trump would “reveal the truth” was a total load of genocidal codswallop.

The good news: a 95-100% probability the next ice-age won’t start in the next 20 years.

In 20 years, I will know either way. Of course, the risk could be a lot higher … or lower. But, if you do die within the next two decades from the effects of global cooling, I will apologise in advance for underestimating the risk.

This is a response to a comment on Roger’s blog, which would be too long to post.

Summary

If you have ever wondered why there was never a push back against the “left wing” campaign for Nut Zero, the answer is simple. There was an equally ruthless “right wing” or “Zionist” campaign supporting Nut Zero, but they had the sense to keep their activities silent and let the left take the blame for Nut Zero.

The result of this strong support from both the left and right/zionists is that the US is the hot bed of the insane “Global warming” cult, because that cult is supported by the right just as much as the left in the US.

The science never mattered. It was never about the science. It was always a political campaign to end the use of middle eastern oil and gas dressed up as “science”. Continue reading →

As I predicted, Starmer is proving absolutely toxic to the Liebour party. He is destroying whatever hope they have left of ever forming another government. But, it’s not Starmer that did it. It is the party that allowed, even enabled, a man like Starmer, the participant of genocide and illegal wars, to get to power.

So I don’t care if Starmer goes. He is toxic and the longer he stays the less chance that Liebour will ever have power again. And so, they too are going the way of the old Whigs.

But what if they pick a new leader? A new leader who can see what Nut Zero and Zionist wars is doing to the economy … which makes a wipe-out of Liebour at the next election ineviable.

So, it is just possible that a new Liebour leader, hoping for a honeymoon effect, will call a new election. Anyone stupid enough to be picked by the Zionists who control Liebour, will probably be stupid enough to believe that they have the “magic” touch to get the Zionist controlled media to love them.

However, will it wash with the gullible British public? I’m not sure I care. I feel like a slave on a plantation watching the masters fight. As long as they are fighting each other, they’re not whipping us. But heaven forbid any of us plebs who get caught smiling!

Hoisted on their own lies

Of course, as far as the Epstein-Zionists are controlled, destroying the left would be a desirable outcome. Which in their minds would mean destroying Liebour. So, keeping Starmer in position will end up with a “right” and thus “pro-Genocide” party … and least that is very likely how they think.

But the Zionist left versus right (always an Epstein Zionist in control) politics is a thing of the past. The public are gullible, but they aren’t fools and despite the most totalitarian brave-new world levels of censorship and control, that system now leaks like a sieve and the truth is getting out. The old order is falling apart, with no clear idea of what is to come. But I suspect it will be hated by those who thrived in the old order where the Epstein Zionist elite supported the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the original chosen people of Palestine.

I read the paper trying to reproduce the flight paths taken by the 911 jets, just before I was about to fly. Which was bizarre enough, but then I found I could not update the article. The reason for the updates not saving still remains unclear, but I did suspect the editor was blocking links to the 911 site, and/or any mention of the genocide of the indigenous people of Palestine.

Of course, there were many different possible explanations from the mundane to the very sinister. Hence, having finally got most of what I wanted to say and the links online (… even if in different articles and not at all well edited), I decided to leave everything as it was … before boreding (isn’t the contempt they have for “passengers” amazing … watching the sheep line up like Palestinians going to the slaughter).

Thus, as I sat squashed in the window seat in the back rows of the plane, I did wonder … as I suspect anyone with the unusual chain of events would, if the worst possible interpretation were true, how my being on the plane was going to be connected with the 911 article. My single hand bag contained 3pants, 3 pairs of socks, (6 socks), 3 teashirts, and a toothbrush, razor a book, camera, rainproof and shorts/nightwear. It seemed the most unlikely retinue to pin on me some kind of “terrorist” actions. So, I quickly went back to watching the black and white version of whisky galore.

Lone Gunmen

But, it did start me wondering how they selected and manipulated people to become the “lone gunmen” that they (usually Zionists) always use to pin the blame on. Did the lone gunmen ever hold any view about anything, or were they merely offered love or riches for their services … neither of which they could ever collect. Was their entire “social” media account then fabricated to match the “extremist lone gunmen” profile “they” always use.

But what I really do wonder, is how they manage to convince someone to basically commit suicide. To anyone hearing of the story afterwards, it sounds bizarre that someone walks into a situation where they are going to be killed. Yet, I have seen the world’s biggest “petrolheads” go from one gaz guzzler to an electric guzzler … something which is just insanely stupid at every level. Yet they were manipulated into thinking black is white.

So, I do know people can be fooled. Likewise when the covid scam came along, I too was fooled … at least to take it seriously for about three months. But little did I realise that the dinosaur of government is not only incapable of action, it is incapable of changing course once that course is set. So, even if Covid had been real and not just the usual flu epidemic rebranded by a failed PCR test and turned into a terror attack by government propaganda, the best course was to just let sleeping governments lie … and keep lying … so long as they did nothing about the fake epidemic of covid.

The End of Climate Alarmism

Ten years ago, I would have been celebrating the end of climate alarmism. I imagined that someday the science would win, and then the alarmists would go off to find something else to be alarmist about. Instead, the science has not won. Instead the practical reality of the ongoing destruction of the economy has turned the public away from the alarmism despite the continuing lies from the alarmists about their supposed “science”. It’s not even fizzled out, it has just ended in an embarrassing mess … rather like the last drunk at a party still shouting and refusing to leave.

There’s no triumph in that. The science has not been improved, instead the funds are running out for all science as the economy is set to decline. We didn’t win the debate … because there was never a debate about the science … instead the big bully in the room with the funding to force “black is white” propaganda as “science” … came head to head with the economic reality that they too relied on the fossil fuel economy they are destroying. And so their scandalous funders, believing in a “get rich quick” scam, are now facing economic ruin and pulling the plug on their “money making” scam.

There is no good way out of the current situation. The US is already slowly fading as a global power and sooner or later it will have a catastrophic economic decline. The EU is a complete basket case. It has no democratic legitimacy and now no economic legitimacy. It is militarily impotent, politically ignorant, and set on a course of Nut Zero economic suicide. But, let’s be honest, except for not being officially tied to the EU or US sinking ship, practically we are. When they go down, we are going down with them.

That’s why climate alarmism no longer matters. Because the insane science and politics that enabled climate alarmism has destroyed our futures. There are no more (plastic) lego blocks to build their ivory towered utopias where there are no fossil fuels. The only reason fossil fuel use is going to decline, is because the economy will shrink. And, as the economy shrinks, the use of fossil fuels as a fraction will increase, because especially in a shrinking economy, people will always opt for the cheapest fuel sources.

Fortunately, the timescales are long. Perhaps we are looking at a century of decline .. decline that will be sold Epstein “elite” controlled government as “economic growth”, but living standards will get worse and worse throughout that “growth”, until sometime in a few hundred years, an Iranian academic will finally write a paper in the Arabic scientific literature about the economic decline of the west. Or maybe Russian or Chinese … or Swahili.

What then of the US?

The US is a stitched together mish mash of states who barely survive as a single unit in the best of times. There is no doubt that when economic decline becomes the norm, the US will split apart. Whether north America ever reaches the same patchwork of countries as became the once single empires of Portugal and Spain in South America, is debatable, but a real possibility. Would the North ever become known as little more than a drug runner’s paradise? Who knows? My bet is that when the US economy fails, the old rational of a single country transferring wealth around from the rich to the poor states will completely implode. Instead the rich states will resist the demands for them to contribute more, and separate off, leaving the poorer states in a big union like the old USSR, and the richer states pretending to be independent (like a cross between the arrogance of Switzerland and the economy of Ukraine).

Will there be another US (un)civil war? Morality and common sense has nothing to do with US politics. Will it suit the Epstein-Zionists to have a civil war? Probably. It is far easier to control one government by blackmail, than a dozen or so new states. So, they will attempt to stop any state leaving the US by force. Of course, that will just make the present situation even less tolerable and fasten the demise of the US cash cow. So, look out China … the Epstein-Zionists are coming for you next!

911

Thinking about it, Trump has already tried to distract the people from his participation in the genocide of the indigenous people of Palestine (the actual chosen people) with an illegal immoral & failed war against Iran and UFO bullshit. It is now logical he tries 911, fukuvirus and every other kind of distraction bullshit.

Governments use conspiracy to hide the truth. The truth is the US and all the Epstein-Zionist regimes are participating the genocide and ethnic cleansing of what any rational analysis would see as “God’s chosen people” as described in the bible.

It’s not going to change my view of the Zionist occupiers & genociders of the chosen people of Palestine to hear that they were also the ones who caused the planes to fly into the towers. It’s not going to change my view of the US Epstein “government” to learn they were participants in 911, the Kennedy & Diana assassination, etc. So, I don’t need or want to know about the US 911 especially at this time Trump is trying to distract us.

What is happening in Palestine is truly the most sickening evil. Of course they would kill thousands of civilians in the US, just as easily as they are killing 100s of thousands of “gods chosen” people in Palestine. There is no morality for evil. There is no morality for Epstein Zionists. There is no evil they wouldn’t commit. They have even murdered Jews in there thousands! Zionism is just a sick cult … which like the Wako cult, looks like it will end up in a grizzly ending.

I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.

Comment

I can’t obviously see what is either being blocked or creating an issue, as there is nothing that should be a problem. However I don’t want to waste more time on the evils of the US and Zionists. Epstein-Zionists … the most disgusting and evil people in the world. Responsible for genocide, ethnic cleansing paedophilia, mass murder, assassinations, killing numerous people like Charlie Kirk. Creators of conspiracy theories to divert attention away from the truth … the truth that they are vile.

NB. I was unable to post the following using the usual editor.

Main link to report: https://ic911.org/reports/manual-or-automated/

Addendum

Link: LINK

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.

I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.

However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).

Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.
US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

Whatever the truth about 911, it is not going to change my view of the US. The US officially spreads conspiracy theories and the US has officially killed its own citizens and participated genocide, ethnic cleansing and numerous other war crimes. The “truth” of 911 isn’t going to change the obnoxious nature of the US whose population still enables the Epstein-Zionist Paedophiles to remain in control