I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.

Comment

I can’t obviously see what is either being blocked or creating an issue, as there is nothing that should be a problem. However I don’t want to waste more time on the evils of the US and Zionists. Epstein-Zionists … the most disgusting and evil people in the world. Responsible for genocide, ethnic cleansing paedophilia, mass murder, assassinations, killing numerous people like Charlie Kirk. Creators of conspiracy theories to divert attention away from the truth … the truth that they are vile.

NB. I was unable to post the following using the usual editor.

Main link to report: https://ic911.org/reports/manual-or-automated/

Addendum

Link: LINK

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.

I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.

However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).

Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.
US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

Whatever the truth about 911, it is not going to change my view of the US. The US officially spreads conspiracy theories and the US has officially killed its own citizens and participated genocide, ethnic cleansing and numerous other war crimes. The “truth” of 911 isn’t going to change the obnoxious nature of the US whose population still enables the Epstein-Zionist Paedophiles to remain in control

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.
The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.
However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.
Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way. They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.
I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.
So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.
Could they all be mistakes?
In order for the paths that were taken to have been taken, it would need to be an unplanned route. But I know from my own experience, that if I wanted to hit a particular side of the building, I would fly around the building till I was roughly heading in the right direction and then I would take a well rehearsed and direct path flight in. Especially if I were intending to commit suicide. Human nature would always find an excuse not to commit suicide. So, anyone planning a suicide flight is going to do it in a very rehearsed way and easy to execute way to minimise the opportunity for excuses for “missing”. Likewise the Pentagon is going to be hit with the simplest descent. That means lining up the building in the centre of the window and keeping as direct a route to the building as possible. There is no way that anyone would attempt to a steep dive that loses visual contact with the target and then “fly at ground level” into the building. They will line up the building and fly a direct line attempting to avoid any changes in flight from that direct line.
Could it be explained by some structural issue of the building meaning some non-obvious flight path is optimum … NO!! Even with the simplest flight path, there is still a high risk for an inexperienced pilot of missing a building. No amount of simulation can prepare for the real world. There could have been cloud, fog, a mistaken building identity. This is a one-shot mission, with an extremely high chance of failure, because no one naturally commits suicide and no simulator can prepare someone for the reality of killing themselves.
Summary
Means

Assuming the facts are correct, my conclusion is that the facts are incompatible with a suicide flight by amateurs. The only viable alternatives is that some very experienced military grade fighter pilots killed themselves, or that the planes were remotely controlled.
Motive

The same as the illegal Zionist war against Iran, to convince the gullible US public to support a war to destroy a potential military competitor to the Zionist takeover of the middle east. It clearly wasn’t anything to do with Al Kidya … they weren’t in Iraq. Iraq was nothing to do with 911, yet the US-Epstein class chose to link 911 to Iraq. The only way to link them was a lie, which implies that 911 and the supposed link to Al Kidya was a lie. (We knew that before this research).
Additional

It is pretty clear that Dr David Kelly of the WMD dodgy dossier was murdered, and so it is now pretty certain he was murdered by the same people for the same reason: to enable the Zionist attack on Iraq.

We have been told by an MI6 operative, that Princess Di Survived the car crash and was murdered in the ambulance taking her away because she was going to start working for Palestinian rights.

Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was growing sceptical of the Zionists.
Kennedy was telling the Zionists they could not have nuclear weapons and then he was murdered.

We know the USS liberty was attacked by the Zionists as a false flag attack to blame the Arabs during the six day way, all with the foreknowledge of the US president.
Individually, I might still have some scepticism, but put together there is a clear pattern of lies and murder all pointing back to the Zionists. The one I was not sure about was 911. The motive was clear, but except for one video saying that debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon was not a commercial jet liner, I had no confirmatory evidence. This latest research (assuming the facts are correct), is confirmation that 911 wasn’t a terrorist attack. Based on all the other Zionist involved plots, it is most likely some form of US/Zionist involved false flag attack.
Sense Check

I’ve reread the discussion of “alternative scenarios” and I cannot see any flaw in the reasoning and so the conclusion seems valid.

Is it possible that someone else planned the attack to blame on Zionists? That seems an incredibly hard argument to make. I’ve never seen a hint of any group capable of this scale of attack being considered for anything similar. Someone somewhere would have suggested alternatives if there were viable alternatives.

Is it possible that the Kennedy assassination was a “lone gunman” who for some unknown reason wanted to kill the president and himself? I’ve never seen any plausible explanation for the behaviour. The only beneficiaries I know from the replacement of Kennedy by his vice president were the Zionists.

Diana survived the car crash. I is incredible that a healthy person who I think was walking around afterwards, should die in the ambulance in a way that they could not be revived. I can’t imagine a mechanism that would do that, which wouldn’t have left such obvious clues that we would all know about it. A car crash even at 80mph, is easily survival as all formula 1 drivers will testify. The only way for Di to have died is if she had to be dragged from wreckage with obvious severe injuries, that did not happen.

Does anyone go out with a blunt penknife to kill themselves? NO!!! And, even if they tried, they would not succeed. A Weapon’s expert knows a lot about dying and they know how to do it quickly and effectively. If they decided to do it, it would be quick, minimising pain and very thorough. That is totally incompatible with a blunt pen knife.
Conspiracy Theories

The simple truth is that the whole modern genre of conspiracy theories was invented by the CIA to cover their U2 spy plane operations by filling the local media with false claims of UFO. It’s also clear from the deluge of conspiracy theories which needs a huge budget, that a massively well funded group like the CIA must have been funding many other conspiracy ideas.

That doesn’t mean every wacky idea is a conspiracy theory invented by the CIA, but a hell of a lot of them are. It also doesn’t mean they are the only ones engaged in these false leads and coverups, but some must be linked to the CIA.

As such, I originally thought that the CIA had invented many of the theories to try to cover up their own mishandling of events. However, I am now forced to face the fact that the planes must have been remote controlled. And, at least the Pentagon one wasn’t a civilian aircraft. That begs the question as to what happened to the supposed passengers, but if you are killing 20,000 in the towers, what are a few extra passengers?

At one point I might have questioned whether any human could have could blooded killed 20,000. Then I saw the cold blooded murder being committed by the Zionists in Palestine, and it’s very clear they could and are doing it.

Is it possible that the 911 “remote controlled aircraft” idea is itself something created by some group. Yes it is. But if so, I don’t know who it would be. The only candidates for creating the conspiracy are people who would be on the US “intelligence” radar and unless they are complicit, they would be detected.

I just don’t see any plausible way to put the evidence available, or even a sceptical view of the available evidence, and come up with a coherent alternative explanation other than a US-Zionist plot. The only contender would be e.g. Russian intelligence trying to discredit the US or Zionists. But from observation, the Russians are useless at the kind of propaganda needed to create conspiracies. It’s just not the way they work. The Zionists might try to create a conspiracy … but why would the Zionists want to implicate Zionists?
As a fictional character (didn’t) say: “when you have removed all the impossible, what is left, no matter how improbable …”

I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.
Addendum

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.

I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.

However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).

Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.
US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

Whatever the truth about 911, it is not going to change my view of the US. The US officially spreads conspiracy theories and the US has officially killed its own citizens and participated genocide, ethnic cleansing and numerous other war crimes. The “truth” of 911 isn’t going to change the obnoxious nature of the US whose population still enables the Epstein-Zionist Paedophiles to remain in control

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.
The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.
However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.
Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way.  They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.
I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.
So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.
Could they all be mistakes?
In order for the paths that were taken to have been taken, it would need to be an unplanned route. But I know from my own experience, that if I wanted to hit a particular side of the building, I would fly around the building till I was roughly heading in the right direction and then I would take a well rehearsed and direct path flight in. Especially if I were intending to commit suicide. Human nature would always find an excuse not to commit suicide. So, anyone planning a suicide flight is going to do it in a very rehearsed way and easy to execute way to minimise the opportunity for excuses for “missing”. Likewise the Pentagon is going to be hit with the simplest descent. That means lining up the building in the centre of the window and keeping as direct a route to the building as possible. There is no way that anyone would attempt to a steep dive that loses visual contact with the target and then “fly at ground level” into the building. They will line up the building and fly a direct line attempting to avoid any changes in flight from that direct line.
Could it be explained by some structural issue of the building meaning some non-obvious flight path is optimum … NO!! Even with the simplest flight path, there is still a high risk for an inexperienced pilot of missing a building. No amount of simulation can prepare for the real world. There could have been cloud, fog, a mistaken building identity. This is a one-shot mission, with an extremely high chance of failure, because no one naturally commits suicide and no simulator can prepare someone for the reality of killing themselves.
Summary
Means
Assuming the facts are correct, my conclusion is that the facts are incompatible with a suicide flight by amateurs. The only viable alternatives is that some very experienced military grade fighter pilots killed themselves, or that the planes were remotely controlled.
Motive
The same as the illegal Zionist war against Iran, to convince the gullible US public to support a war to destroy a potential military competitor to the Zionist takeover of the middle east. It clearly wasn’t anything to do with Al Kidya … they weren’t in Iraq. Iraq was nothing to do with 911, yet the US-Epstein class chose to link 911 to Iraq. The only way to link them was a lie, which implies that 911 and the supposed link to Al Kidya was a lie. (We knew that before this research).
Additional
It is pretty clear that Dr David Kelly of the WMD dodgy dossier was murdered, and so it is now pretty certain he was murdered by the same people for the same reason: to enable the Zionist attack on Iraq.
We have been told by an MI6 operative, that Princess Di Survived the car crash and was murdered in the ambulance taking her away because she was going to start working for Palestinian rights.
Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was growing sceptical of the Zionists.
Kennedy was telling the Zionists they could not have nuclear weapons and then he was murdered.
We know the USS liberty was attacked by the Zionists as a false flag attack to blame the Arabs during the six day way, all with the foreknowledge of the US president.
Individually, I might still have some scepticism, but put together there is a clear pattern of lies and murder all pointing back to the Zionists. The one I was not sure about was 911. The motive was clear, but except for one video saying that debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon was not a commercial jet liner, I had no confirmatory evidence. This latest research (assuming the facts are correct), is confirmation that 911 wasn’t a terrorist attack. Based on all the other Zionist involved plots, it is most likely some form of US/Zionist involved false flag attack.
Sense Check
I’ve reread the discussion of “alternative scenarios” and I cannot see any flaw in the reasoning and so the conclusion seems valid.
Is it possible that someone else planned the attack to blame on Zionists? That seems an incredibly hard argument to make. I’ve never seen a hint of any group capable of this scale of attack being considered for anything similar. Someone somewhere would have suggested alternatives if there were viable alternatives.
Is it possible that the Kennedy assassination was a “lone gunman” who for some unknown reason wanted to kill the president and himself? I’ve never seen any plausible explanation for the behaviour. The only beneficiaries I know from the replacement of Kennedy by his vice president were the Zionists.
Diana survived the car crash. I is incredible that a healthy person who I think was walking around afterwards, should die in the ambulance in a way that they could not be revived. I can’t imagine a mechanism that would do that, which wouldn’t have left such obvious clues that we would all know about it. A car crash even at 80mph, is easily survival as all formula 1 drivers will testify. The only way for Di to have died is if she had to be dragged from wreckage with obvious severe injuries, that did not happen.
Does anyone go out with a blunt penknife to kill themselves? NO!!! And, even if they tried, they would not succeed. A Weapon’s expert knows a lot about dying and they know how to do it quickly and effectively. If they decided to do it, it would be quick, minimising pain and very thorough. That is totally incompatible with a blunt pen knife.
Conspiracy Theories
The simple truth is that the whole modern genre of conspiracy theories was invented by the CIA to cover their U2 spy plane operations by filling the local media with false claims of UFO. It’s also clear from the deluge of conspiracy theories which needs a huge budget, that a massively well funded group like the CIA must have been funding many other conspiracy ideas.
That doesn’t mean every wacky idea is a conspiracy theory invented by the CIA, but a hell of a lot of them are. It also doesn’t mean they are the only ones engaged in these false leads and coverups, but some must be linked to the CIA.
As such, I originally thought that the CIA had invented many of the theories to try to cover up their own mishandling of events. However, I am now forced to face the fact that the planes must have been remote controlled. And, at least the Pentagon one wasn’t a civilian aircraft. That begs the question as to what happened to the supposed passengers, but if you are killing 20,000 in the towers, what are a few extra passengers?
At one point I might have questioned whether any human could have could blooded killed 20,000. Then I saw the cold blooded murder being committed by the Zionists in Palestine, and it’s very clear they could and are doing it.
Is it possible that the 911 “remote controlled aircraft” idea is itself something created by some group. Yes it is. But if so, I don’t know who it would be. The only candidates for creating the conspiracy are people who would be on the US “intelligence” radar and unless they are complicit, they would be detected.
I just don’t see any plausible way to put the evidence available, or even a sceptical view of the available evidence, and come up with a coherent alternative explanation other than a US-Zionist plot. The only contender would be e.g. Russian intelligence trying to discredit the US or Zionists. But from observation, the Russians are useless at the kind of propaganda needed to create conspiracies. It’s just not the way they work. The Zionists might try to create a conspiracy … but why would the Zionists want to implicate Zionists?
As a fictional character (didn’t) say: “when you have removed all the impossible, what is left, no matter how improbable …”
I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.
I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.
Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?
No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.
The Shear Scale
The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.
However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.
We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.

Addendum

I have looked at further information on the site (link) this shows that at least some evidence has been tampered with (the same photo is shown with and without a “rung” on a vertical pole which is evidence for the size of the “plane” hitting the Pentagon. So, I have to be suspicious of all evidence.
I have read accounts of the various reported phone calls, none of which I can validate. But the reported calls indicate there were passengers and there is at least some radio broadcast that overhears speech in Arabic (very easy to fabricate!). It is suggested that on one flight a hijacker got into the cockpit before the plane took off by claiming to be a “pilot”.
However, none of that explains the strange manoeuvres. There were military aircraft in the air who might have reached the planes, but whilst a sudden change of course might have been useful for the first plane to hit the towers, there was absolutely no point for the second plane. It would know the first plane hit, and so would the military and for the second plane it is a race to hit the tower before it gets taken out (or at least to fly over areas where it would not be taken down).
Which means I cannot explain the bizarre behaviour of the sudden change in course that could not be repeated by the academic preparing the paper that triggered this article.

US supports genocide

However, given the widespread support for genocide in the US, I am extremely uncomfortable even going to a “questioning” site in the US. As such I will not be pursuing this further, indeed, it’s pretty clear the US is a very obnoxious society that could have easily killed 20,000 of its own citizens to delude the public to further the evil aims of Zionists.

I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.

The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.

However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.

Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way.  They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.

I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.

So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.

Could they all be mistakes?

Continue reading →

In a previous post I said I was going to vote SNP.

Then I heard the SNP were going to declare a right to chain Scotland to the least government in the world and make voting pointless.

Then I remembered we had a list system and I could put the parties on a list from first to last. So, I carefully researched the various parties working out an order which would put pro-Palestinian parties first. I finally decided to put SSP first, an Independent Green next, some independents who seemed likely to be pro-Palestine, a few other parties that were pro-Palestine and then just in case Reform.

Having carefully worked out the order to place them, I arrived at the polling station to be told that the SNP had changed the voting system so I only had one vote. That would have caused me to vote in a very different way … one I had not researched … so all my planning to vote to support smaller parties went out the window. I had to vote for a party with a chance of getting a seat. Labour was voting for the most evil PM we’ve ever had. I’ve still not forgiven the Lib Dems for their contemptuous behaviour after we voted to leave the EU – and there was nothing about the local candidate on Palestine. I promised myself that I would never vote Tory again following their appalling behaviour during covid and Brexit. And, I had no idea of the chances of the SSP … which meant I was likely throwing my vote away on a party that I had nothing in common with except they are against the genocide of Palestinians.

The only choice I had was “old contempt” or “new change” … and with the Greens trumpeting their noxious anti-family policies and generally reminding me how much I loathed the current party, and the SNP having made me extremely angry by changing the voting system and just generally being obnoxious, I wasn’t voting for them. So, despite my promise to my self to vote pro-Palestine, the only party left on my list with a good chance of getting a seat was Reform.

I had actually thought I might just vote “non of the above” … until I first remembered there was a list system, and then discovered there was not … and I was so angry I just forgot about that option.

It did help that I saw two reform candidates had supported Palestine … though the leadership’s sucking up to the genociders was still hard to swallow. But rather angrily, because it wasn’t what I planned to do and didn’t have time to think it through,  I hastily voted Reform.

Climate

Note: I didn’t even consider climate as an issue. The reason is the moronic politicians no longer have any option but to bow before the reality of the situation. They can huff and puff all they like, but they ain’t going any further with nut zero. So, why should I care what the policy of the idiots in power is on that subject, when it can’t affect the outcome any longer?

There’s little doubt in my mind that the same people were behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination as much as Kennedy’s or indeed Princess Di. They all seemed strange at the time, the stories just did not make sense. But, as I’ve learnt more and more about the behaviour of those who committed the crimes, it all fits an oft repeated pattern.

Yet, 60 years ago when they killed President Kennedy, the world was a very different place in terms of what someone like me could get to know. Unless I happened to know someone on the team investigating the assassinations, or happened to be part of the group organising and carrying out the assassinations, then it would be extremely difficult to know anything other than what the media was telling me. And, that media is controlled by much the same groups with the same intent of stifling any information on certain subjects.

Yet, now with the internet, I, and along with me many other like Neil Oliver, do get to hear about all these appalling things that happen in the world … things that we would never have heard about in the past.

To many, who weren’t aware, or haven’t worked it out, it must seem that the world has suddenly become overwhelmed with evil. Yet, that evil always existed. It killed Kennedy, it killed Diana, and recently it killed Charlie Kirk. That evil is not new, what is new, is that we now know the “official” narrative is a total load of codswallop. And we know that because of the internet.

So, the internet is a great thing?

Continue reading →

I’ve been watching Neil Oliver’s videos for a while, and it is clear that he is becoming increasingly convinced that something is seriously wrong and therefore that we are heading toward “doom”.

And, I agree, except we’ve been heading that way for a lot longer than Neil Oliver has realised. And, I know the type of people who are “leading the way”, and I am pretty certain that most of them would be totally clueless about the huge “conspiracy” that Neil now sees all around him.

But, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Just because those in the thick of it can’t see what their actions are doing, doesn’t mean the combined effect of their actions isn’t heading the way Neil Oliver is seeing.

Neil has this firm idea that there is some “controlling mind” orchestrating the destruction of so much that we value. In contrast, I see a few idiots with brain dead ideas who get a lot of publicity, and a lot of complicit people in positions of power who just go along with whatever they assume is the way to go. They are not conspiring to destroy the world, they are simply destroying the world without much thinking about it.

But, in a sense that kind of person is far more dangerous than some controlling mind. A controlling mind has a sense of purpose and an idea of what they want to achieve and what they do not. The people who actually “control” the west aren’t like that. They have vague ideas about strange things like “Carbon” and they get bombarded with ideas from people wanting to use these vague ideas to make themselves rich, and somehow that all gets developed into “government policy” … without a lot of thought and with no scepticism or search for contrary input at all. As such, the west is just braindead walking into disaster with no real idea of a goal or a purpose or an aim or any sense of how they want to achieve anything if they had an idea what anything was.

And, it’s not that they don’t care about destroying society. They simply haven’t thought about it. It’s not crossed their radar that their actions are destroying their own future. Nor, would they even entertain the idea that what they were doing could be bad.

They just carry on … braindead carrying on their walk to the destruction of our futures … causing people like Neil Oliver to start screaming: “we’re heading for disaster”, yet they will not listen.

The climate insanity has gone through the following phaess:

1. Pretend debate about the “science” (when we were not allowed to know the actual science)
2. Watching and laughing as the climate idiots started get disaster after disaster
3. Watching the climate idiots constantly banging their heads on the reality wall

The first two were fun, because the science was clearly on our side and the idiots on the other.

The third is not. It is like watching a deranged mental patient constantly hit their head in the wall. It’s just painful to watch. Yes, I know in their head they believe they are in some other reality, like Napoleon fighting a battle, or building a temple or whatever it is that their deluded mind thinks is going on. But the result is just a deluded mental patient banging their head on the wall and there is absolutely nothing I can do about it.

Where would I even start trying to explain the real world to a head-banger climate nutter? Do you go into their deluded world and try to talk to them there? There is just such a chasm between their “reality” and the head-bangers that I see.

I can’t celebrate winning this way. There is no great triumph being proved right as the head-bangers damage themselves.

I always thought that reality would eventually force them to change their minds. Yes, they can write up the “science” in what ever way they like, but in the end they can’t change reality, so reality was always going to win. But I thought there would be a rational response as reality began winning. I thought there would be a realisation that they have been talking bollocks. Instead they are now just mental patients incapable of changing their behaviour constantly banging their head on a a brick wall.

A General Malaise

I’ve slowly come to the realisation, that climate isn’t something special. Instead climate is just one of many areas where rational evidence based thinking has been swept up and hidden under the carpet.

And, from what I can see of AI users, the future trend seems to be that this sweeping of the unwanted evidence under the carpet is growing as a way of “thinking”.

For example. Trump fails to achieve any of his aims for the Epstein-Zionist attack on Iran. The Iranians achieve their main aims. Yet, the US is seriously trying to say that it was a “victory”. No doubt they are also describing Ukraine as a “victory”. No doubt the killer covid jab was a “victory”, indeed no doubt the covid pandemic was also a “victory” … it is after now only what the propagandists say it is. The reality doesn’t matter any longer.

That might be true in short-term US politics, where you can win an election by a bare faced lie (like “I will end wars” … or I am “pro life”). But even in the corruption of the cesspit of Epstein-US politics, reality will eventually rear its ugly head, and when it does, no amount of lying can change reality.

And, the simple reality, is that the corruption & arrogance in the west is now so endemic is so many areas, especially academia, that we are now falling rapidly behind the rest of the world. Reality as in real science, is now just an inconvenience. Evidence based medicine … just a way to lose money. Evidence based arms development … just a way to hand sales to the opposition. Reality based foreign policy … just a way to hand power to the “losers” who think the west is in decline.

We are now on an airplane tumbling out the sky, where the pilot’s “solution” (as with AI they now have no job piloting the plane) is to run another educational video trying to brainwash the passengers that this is the best airline in the world and (despite all the rumours) they never crash. [And forget maintenance … the plane hasn’t seen an engineer since it was delivered from China

I supported Boris, knowing he had included a nasty green policy in his manifesto, but whilst that stopped me actively endorsing him, I decided he had probably just added it to get votes. He then turned out to be a disaster. Gave us “Brexit” in name only and instead went fool speed ahead on the green crap. Then he allowed the pompous twats in SAGE to run their totalitarian regime during covid whilst he sat about partying.

I supported Trump … knowing he had moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to occupied Jerusalem. But I kidded myself that he was probably not going to be pandering to the Zionists, because he was going to blow the whole Zionist show open by revealing all the people involved in the Epstein swamp. HOW WRONG I WAS. He is the most obnoxious person ever it to get into the white house and is clearly lock, stock and everything else dancing as a puppet of the Zionists doing exactly what he is told to do. He is not emptying the Epstein swamp but wallowing in it like fat pig.

There is a genocide happening to the original people of the Holy Land by a bunch of thugs that have come in an mafia-like stolen their land, bit by bit, using constant harassment and aggression to edge them out of their own land. And, if they dare to resist, it is those resisting the seizure of their own land that get labelled “Terrorists”?!?!?

They have illegally taken large parts Palestine, and Lebanon, and now they are taking Syria. They will never stop. There will never be peace there, and, by extension never peace in the rest of the world, because I now strongly suspect that most wars fought by the US … which is probably most wars globally …  are to support the Zionist agenda.

Yet despite the fact that genocide is happening, it is not those supporting the genocide who are ending up in jail in the UK. In sharp contrast, is those supporting Palestine Action which are finding themselves in jail for the “crime” of  opposing genocide. The whole legal system has been turned on itself and is being used, not for the upholding of the law, but the thwarting of the law and the enabling of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

“Our” government is clearly no longer ours. It has been seized, like the Palestinian land, by those supporting the genocide of Palestinians.

I wanted to vote Reform. Because “Reform” is what we need. Yet, Reform have clearly taken the Zionist shilling and in light of the experience of Johnson and Trump, I believe they are no different from all the other parties turning over “our” government to forces that have no interest in the UK. That means Reform are not going to end emigration to the UK from the middle east. Reform are not going to do anything that hurts their Zionist masters. Because no one honestly supports genocide unless they are being manipulated or forced to do so.

So, that gives me a choice of “Your Party”, the “Greens” or the “SNP”. I don’t have to read their “manifestos” to know I hate every policy they have. Yet, that is my choice.

The other simple fact, is I want to keep out those who have been supporting the genocide, which means primarily Liebour and the Stories. That all pushes me toward SNP, despite all I have said about the importance of a sane energy policy.

At least I won’t be disappointed and let down this time this time … I know I am voting for some of the most obnoxious policies, particularly Nut Zero. But to be honest, the Nut Zero carnival float has met the tank stopping bollards of reality and reality is going to win. So, I don’t fear Nut Zero any longer.

But I do want my own government back. I don’t want it bowing and scraping to genociders, I want a government that will be prosecuting them!! The first step toward that is, I say with extreme regret, voting SNP.