It has now become clear that Israel killed JFK and that Israel has pretty much been controlling US politics since. In other words, Israel is the US deep state … the state within the state.

It is also very clear, that during that period of Israeli control, the US debt has been increasing to unsustainable levels, presumably in order to send a massive dollop of US money regularly to Israel without the US public complaining.

The US is not the only country that has suffered massive rising debt, nor Israeli control/influence. Nor has the period since JFK been entirely bad. There was largely peace in Europe … unless you were a country the EU wanted to take over. There was growing prosperity … unless you count the debt per person and then it’s arguable whether we are any richer. However, the US let the deep state=Israel run its country into massive debt, and now even Musk, who is deeply embedded in the US deep state, can see that the situation is unsustainable.

More importantly, so can all those countries that used to accept the worthless bits of paper called US dollars for their goods. Sooner or later, the dollar will crash and anyone left holding the dollar will find they are next to worthless. And a bit like musical chairs, people are trying desperately to cosset their “own chair” whilst not letting on to others that the music will soon stop and that those without a chair are going to crash and burn. They need an excuse to ditch the dollar … and BRICS was that excuse … one eagerly accepted.

But, what does that mean for Israel, that has effectively been living off the US like a parasite since JFK? It means the parasite’s host is going to become extremely ill, and indeed, it may implode and break up, leaving the parasite without its host.

Since they killed JFK, Israel has been making itself the most hated country in the middle east. Basically the quintessential little hitler who goes around with the school bully. The mini Hitler cannot be touched … because they control the school bully.  But, take away the school bully and life looks extremely bad for the mini Hitler.

Of course, everything takes longer than we might imagine. But metaphorically I can already see the vultures circling over Israel.

The people of Jesus the Palestinian will return to their land and the European Jewish Zealots … will … who cares?

The significant fact is that Kennedy was the president to demand that Israel not develop nuclear weapons. This is how the Jerusalem Post described Kennedy’s actions which are inconceivable given the power of the lobby today.

I set off my computer to search … about half an hour ago and it is still searching.

So, I was about to make some comment about the latest US spam with Russian characters … when I noticed the other search (of documents not spreadsheets) had completed.

Found the code name for my next operation against the globalists: either хиба́ра or халупа .

Bye

The best reading of Starmer’s action … although ascribing any thought to it at all seems dubious, but if Starmer’s brain is doing anything it seems to be trying to manufacture a conflict with Russia … a conflict, which all the numbers shows that Russia will win very decisively. Indeed, much the same as a horse swatting away a fly.

So, what is the point?

The EU and Starmer are actively working to attack Russia. Nobody on this planet with even the smallest brain, can imagine that those working so hard to kill Russians, could be part of a “peace keeping force” … it’s pathetic on the scale of a first year Student union bitch slap.

It is totally mad. Even if the attempt is to try to drag Trump into a war with Russia, I cannot see it working. It is so obvious to Trump that he should have totally absolutely completely … nothing at all to do with the insane rantings of the moron.

Should it worry Trump if Starmer did send this pointless expedition of no benefit to the UK whatsoever? Why should he? An independent country can be stupid. Trump will simply want to draw a very deep and wide blue water between the insanity of Starmer  and the US.

There is no reason at all for the US to get involved.

Starmer even needs US agreement to fire nuclear weapons (if they work at all). Trump will not give that agreement. Which leaves France as the only idiots who might fire on Russia … which if they did, contrary to Trump’s agreement, would mean the US would not fire on Russia if it retaliated in a proportionate & rational way against France.

(Sorry France … the rest of the world does not want nuclear Armageddon just to save you from your own stupid actions).

Conclusion

During the regime of Biden, I developed plans to cope with a nuclear war, because we were only one false move away from a path that inevitably led to nuclear war.

Do I need to resurrect this work? Even if I don’t think it likely, will enough other people start believing nuclear war is likely?

It is just so daft, that it is hard to take seriously. But, there are idiots out there (such as Starmer) and they might be persuaded to spend money on “prepping” for the end of the world.

The question is this: how much time would it take me to prepare something, and would there still be enough time to make money before it all flopped … and is that really want I want to do … make money from the entirely gullible? The answer is no.

So, is there even the remotest chance of a nuclear war now? On the one side, Macron and Starmer are evil and they would certainly have no qualms starting WWIII. But … let’s just say they wouldn’t last long. There is not a chance in hell of any leader involved in creating WWIII living very long. And, they will know it. They might not go to a court of law, but justice they will get. So, there is no amount of money that could entice them to that death sentence. Moreover, most of the world will be clapping on their demise. So, there is no chance of them finding some secret sanctuary somewhere.

And, it need not have anything to do with Russia. Enough people will hate them for what they did, that there will be people in every country on the globe willing to take a shot at them.

… they are just like children doing a tantrum … trying to get attention when absolutely none is deserved. It’s going to flop, and if I started doing anything now … it will be dead before I get anywhere.

One of the great benefits of boycotting all the legacy media and anyone else pushing the global warming crap, is that I don’t get a weather forecast. Not that they are any longer forecasts, instead they are yet another tool in the armoury of the global warming nuttters trying to manipulate people, as they did during covid, to stay indoors, not to travel, etc etc.

The fun thing, is waking up everyone morning and having no idea what the weather will be like when I open the curtains (although if it is windy, I obvious hear the wind, etc.).

But it is really a delight to see the weather … a little bit like having Christmas everyday … although there are far too many great aunt handkerchiefs and socks that were not wanted. However, even the rainy days play there part, for they make the glorious sunny mornings a true delight, an unexpected present brought to me by nature.

Yes, those who get told what weather the weathermen are going to give them tomorrow, learn to accept what they are given. They learn to do as they are told, to go out when the weather is “good” and to stay at home when it saves CO2 or promotes the covid hysteria. But, I don’t do that. Each morning, indeed, each afternoon, the weather is an unexpected gift.

I’m not a great fan of making comments when I know everyone agrees with me … what’s the point? There has to be something new to be said to make it worth my time. So, it is getting a bit worrying, that I haven’t felt the need to comment on the climate for several weeks.

How many times can I say “Yippee the climate madness is falling apart”?

Every story I’ve read lately is either of something going disastrously wrong for the nutters, or tittering on the edge of going disastrously wrong. There is no longer the great threats of the past. It’s just lame failures.

I see today, that the UK economy had negative growth … clearly the post covid Totalitarianism spending spree has come to an end, and now the real state of the Nut Zero destroyed economy is poking through. It seems safe to predict an official recession fairly soon.

No doubt the collapsing economy will be seized on by two tier Starmer as yet another reason to keep this hated PM in power … but the writing is on the wall for him as daily he creates more and more people who just want to see the back of him.

I never predicted that I might feel sorry to see the climate nuttery disappearing. But, I suppose, it was so easy to know I was right on the climate, because the people pushing the climate insanity were clearly and unequivocally real scum.

But  ….

I wonder what comes next?

Is the current insanity on climate going to be replaced with yet more insanity? If so, what? Will it be so clear cut? Will climate mutate … will we get get the global cooling scare?

The simple fact, is that whatever comes, will be what makes certain people money and they don’t give a damn about the morality. They just care that there are enough gullible people to fall for their media lies … and … I too can be gullible, just as covid showed.

But, I just can’t see anything else replacing the utter crass stupidity of the climate nutters who defied science, defied scepticism and defied economic common sense. They had nothing going for them … except $billions of government slush money and the tens of thousands of idiots that buys to push the scam.

Will I ever see another scam that was so easy to pick sides?

A casual observation of the Ukrainian conflict indicates that Russia was to enforce the clear “red line” it has over EU and Nato expansion (the two are basically the same aggression). So, that would indicate that if Russia can be persuaded that its western borders are free from further threat from Nato and the EU, that the war will come to an end.

However, is that really Russia’s goal? Because, for me it is quite clear that Putin’s intention is to realign world-view of Russia to exclude the EU and basically cut off the EU from Russia and prevent is malign influence in Russia. In doing that, Putin has a new global ambition … to do with diplomacy and morality, what the US deep state has been attempting to do with guns, violence and regime change … indeed, the US deep state’s horrific war crimes is what is enabling Putin’s global ambition.

I think Putin is looking for reasons not to have any dealings with the EU, and by that means to persuade his fellow Russians, that their future lies elsewhere than the outer western fringes of Eurasia.

To do that, Putin needs the EU to do something really stupid, and committing to an insane level of spending on arms, when the economies are already in sharp decline and their societies are falling apart, is just what Putin needs to trigger the western collapse.

Better still, the EU is one of the most appalling anti-democratic regimes on the planet and constantly meddling in the affairs of its neighbours (arguably worse than the US). So, what is it going to do with an army? There is no doubt it will start using it … first on the people still trapped in the EU, and then it will expand its war crimes abroad …causing the rest of the world to unite against the EU. The only country it will not attack is Russia, because it knows Russia will win. But the “bullyboy” attacks globally, will only further strengthen Russia’s position.

Putin, with his intelligence background, has seen the true horror of the EU oligarchs as  they attack every country, not just outside, but inside the EU. He knows what this monster will do when it steals other people’s money to get arms, and he knows that will either lead to the downfall of the EU in a massive “civil war”, or it will lead to the rest of the world joining Russia to fight the EU (and win) … because the only way for the EU to win against Russia, is to get rid of the EU oligarchs and then totally restructure society and culture … which would create an EU that could win against Russia, but it would have no desire to go to war with Russia as well.

But whether civil war, or EU WWIII, either way the EU war mongers do not scare Putin. Indeed, they are just what Putin needs to change the whole global sphere “for the good” … and coincidentally lead to a system where Russia is in a very advantageous situation.

The problem for the EU Oligarchs

The EU oligarchs are power crazed individuals who will not tolerate any opposition …  which is duly squashed by all the (other people’s money) they have at their disposal. They are ruthless … funding numerous groups to push their EU agenda, using the “law”, press, and no doubt criminal activities as well, to ensure any opposition to their further expansion is destroyed. And, they are obsessive about it … to the extent that if any opposition does stand up to them, they cannot tolerate it at all. Hence their obsession with Russia … it just cannot happen!!!!!!!

It’s a mental condition … they cannot tolerate opposition to them … particularly when it is winning. And, Putin knows it, and no doubt he is using that to destroy them.

Which is very good for us in the UK, because the EU is also a huge threat to us.

I think I’ve found an artefact that is around 2million years old, hear in Britain. So, what do I need to do? Absolutely nothing! Because I’m the only one who recognises that it might be an artefact.

Isn’t that odd! The artefact doesn’t change, the age of the artefact remains the same, but because people do not recognise it as an artefact, that is what changes everything.

But, when you come to think of it, in any bag of sand, from most rivers, there will be many pieces that used to be part of something made by humans. Some of those could be the oldest pieces of man made material in Britain. Yet, they are just bits of debris that people throw away, because they do not recognise them for what they are.

Because now the British using the odd satellite available have to daily count up the dead bodies from their satellite images, and daily tell the Ukrainians they are losing and they don’t have a hope of winning. And now British operators will be suffering PTS from the shear volume of death and destruction they are seeing. For NO possible benefit to anyone!

And then Starmer, might get the message about the real nature of the war.

Since Trump became president, the chances of the US entering into the death and destruction of a nuclear war has become almost zero. Which, as the US controls UK nuclear weapons, means the UK isn’t going to be allowed to use nuclear weapons.

So, Starmer is going to send the British army to die in Ukraine. I’m not going to spend any time researching the figures, so I’ll pick them from memory. But if memory serves me right there are about 30,000 in the British army and about 20 to 40 working tanks.

About 1million have died in Ukraine. The vast bulk on the Ukrainian side that never fails to leave its people in an unwinnable position to get slaughtered. But, even if we assume parity, that is some 500 deaths a day on each side. Even if Starmer slaughtered the British army to the last woman, that would extend the war by 60 days. A more likely scenario is the toppling of Starmer within days of the slaughter starting.

Realistically the globalist forces opposing Russia’s fight for Russians in Ukraine would need a force of about a million to fight the current war (and arguably still lose) and perhaps 30million** to fight Russia with any prospect of winning as it too would start increasing the size of its army. Because only when you get to at least 15million, does Russia start struggling … and that is assuming it gets no help from all the other countries who would love to see the west fall.

We are talking 1000s of ships, which means 100s of new docks, tens of thousands of tanks, all of which mean totally reversing the decline of heavy industry that has been a government policy for well over 40 years.

We are talking about begging China to massively increase its supply of everything essential for war, from steel, to chemicals for explosives , to rare metals for drone production. China will say no, as will India, as will every other country outside the west. So the west will be left on its own to fight Starmer’s pathetic war.

Even the Britain of WWII which had the belief in itself to arm to fight against Totalitarians in the form of National Socialists, would now struggle to turn around the Britain of today to fight against the army that won WWII for the allies. It would take them at least a decade to prepare.

We are not just starting from the almost total destruction of industry that was essential to winning WWII … but from a government and media culture that clapped that on and delighted as every industry critical to fighting war fell and vanished. It would take at least a decade to rebuild that industry. It would also take at least a decade to change the culture of government to not just permit, but enthusiastically support with all  its heart and sole, the industry that government destroyed. You cannot start rebuilding the war industries, until government changes its own culture.

And, Russians know it, and that is why they are laughing at Starmer and the idiots who imagine they could win a war with Russia.

**Typically cultures can only produce armies about 10% the size of the population. In order to win (as Russia is defending which gives a huge advantage), an opposing force needs a 2:1 ratio. Hence the force needed to win against Russia is about 30 million. But, realistically given the constant wars created by the west, China, Iran and a host of other countries will join the Russians. Countries that start from a massive superiority in war manufacturing capability and peoples … and cultures that will allow their people to support war, as opposed to the “soft” western culture that will crumble at the first sign of western blood.

Addendum

French nuclear weapons … good luck to them if they fire them on Russia! I do not believe Russia will hesitate to take out all French military establishments and also anything essential to rebuilding the military industrial complex in France.

Likewise, if Starmer and the EU started rearming for war with Russia, the US would never elect a pro-war government that would permit nuclear weapons to keep the insane oligarchs of the EU in power. Sure, the US would supply arms, at huge cost, and against secured assets (it won’t accept loans, because the EU economy is going to crash). But if the starmer-EU starts a war, one it clearly cannot win, the US is never going to join it.

There is no point joining the losing side.