I was in the room when a documentary of Michelle Mone was being played. The next day I was wondering what she was like. How does someone from one of the poorer parts of Glasgow end up marrying what one described as a billionaire?

Unfortunately the torrent of press and BBC hatred was such, that I couldn’t tell much about the real Michelle Mone and certainly nothing about whether I would approve or otherwise of her actions.

But, I did wonder if she liked her life. It’s not a life I would ever chose, but that doesn’t mean Michelle is unhappy. Nor could I tell if she was happy.

However, it was painfully obvious that there was a huge amount of prejudice against her because she came from Glasgow and was not the “right class” for the snooty cows on the  BBC.

I’ve long known that sexual orientation is a complex thing, because so much of what people perceive as being “male” or “female” is looks or behaviour that isn’t intrinsic to one or other sex and is not present in some societies. In particular, I would look at the ugly models presented on TV as “beautiful” and wonder in whose eyes are they the most beautiful women in the world? They weren’t, yet the commentators would go on about how beautiful they were … almost (on reflection) as if they were being paid to say it. And then rather than the anorexic models of the west, I saw African beauty.  Another example: the perception of the attractiveness of large breasts vary dramatically between societies. If the global manhood cannot even decide on a single model of “beauty” then clearly sexual identity is an extremely complex issue with no single answer or cause. So, obviously it is easy to get confused, especially if there are groups deliberately trying to muddy the waters. Continue reading →

The European people of Israel are committing genocide against the original people of Palestine, the original JEWISH people of Palestine, who have not changed, except they saw Islam as a new version of Abraham’s religion. So, quite literally a holocaust against the original Jews, committed by Europeans … with far far less claim to be the original people of that land.

The WWII holocaust, was likewise, the people of Germany murdering people who were closely related to them through interbreeding, but shared a descent from the Jews of Palestine.

In both cases, the act was appalling, but in the case of the “Israelis” killing those CLOSER related to the Jews of the Old testament, the crime is all the worse, because the European Jews KNOW the nature of their crime having experienced it and yet they are killing the people with MORE right to the land than their own which lapsed many many centuries ago.

The Palestinians are “God’s chosen people”. You can argue whether that proves god doesn’t exist, because he isn’t smiting the Europeans invading his land, that he allows his chosen people to be murdered, but you cannot in any way argue their murder is moral.

THE EVIL TORY PARTY

Which brings me to the sickening scum and betrayal of humanity which is the UK Tory party. A party that has argued that it is OK for European Israelis to commit genocide when stealing the land of the Original Palestinian Jews, but it is not OK for those Palestinians to in any way at all put up ANY kind of resistance, even the taking of hostages** … without killing them … no that attempt to stop the invasion of the Europeans is a justification to murder babies according to the UK Tory Party.

It’s easy to see how the National Socialists murdered so many Jews when the UK Tory and Liebour parties are now openly in favour of the holocaust of the original Jewish people of Palestine. The National Socialists would be right at home in the UK parliament and the Tories and Liebour would be howling for more Jews to be murdered if it were WWII now.

**AKA as prisoners … just what the European Israelis have done by grabbing Palestinians with no legal process and holding them without due process for the “crime” of protesting the illegal theft and occupation of THEIR LAND.

I have already upgraded my mobile to a “dumbphone” which now allows me to switch it off and only switch it on when it is necessary to be on and just today I read a comment from someone saying “is it time to ditch the mobile phone entirely”.

I’ve also started filtering emails for any gmail or google emails, and treating them like spam. Because too often I am lured into revealing personal details to google by replying emails containing JUST ONE gmail address. They are a spy in the digital room.

So, the first mistake was that it should have been a criminal offence for anyone except the intended recipient(s) to read an email, without the express permission of the addressee EACH AND EVERY TIME.

The second evil, was that big US corpse were able to get away with the virus/spam attacks to drive people to give up independent software and thus were forced to use those producing the email/spam. Every big US corpse does it. They attack everyone else by manufacturing spam/viruses/bots that make like such a pain if you use anyone else but a big US corpse that huge numbers gave up ALL THEIR PERSONAL DATA to US corpse marketing depts to use to manipulate them. Continue reading →

Perhaps 3 years ago I bough an air fryer, the first new kitchen gadget I had bought in about 30 years. Although to be fair, about 10 years ago I bought a second hand thing for chopping nuts. Yes, I have bought replacements, and for example the replacement tumble drier was a condenser one rather than an air vent.

60 years ago there were no computers, no tumble driers, no double glazing, fitted carpets were rare. 40 years ago the first home computers were being used. Things were rapidly changing. But, by around 2000, almost everything we have now was already available. Laptops, electronic watches, tumble driers, flat screen TVs. Duvets. After a century of innovation, we started to see stagnation.

About the only significant change has been electric cars, a technology so unpopular that they can only get a few idiots to buy it using non-stop advertising. Advertising that will eventually have to end, because there are not enough fools to buy many more.

That is the difference. Last century was technology change driven by consumer demand. This century almost the only change is driven by lobbyists twisting the arm of government to force the more stupid parts of society to buy it.

And, that is now the defining feature of “new technology”. It is not technology change that the consumer wants, but change being forced on people by lobbyists trying to create a market for a product no one wants. It is “innovation” we could have done a century ago (there have always been electric cars), but it wasn’t done because the consumer did not want it.

That is because technology is now stagnating.

The only exception to that rule is within the computer screen. But, that is because computers are still relatively new. Rapidly, all that can be done will be done, and soon people will run out of new things worth doing on a computer and that too will stagnate.

Soon, the pretence of “upgrading” micro$oft will become obvious to most people, when their machine “slows down” and “requires” an “upgrade” which provides exactly the same facilities, just less the Micro$oft created block on performance unless you pay them the bribe of getting a “new” operating system.

People will discover that they can keep the same performance by never upgrading with another operating system and Micro$oft will be no more.

The old business model of forcing the consumer to ditch their old devices by the lure of “something better” is going to disappear, because there will be nothing better to offer. The only business model that will work, is repair, maintenance and replacement. More and more, consumers will want devices with long life and that can be repaired.

Patents

The problem with a patent, is that it only protects and invention for 25 years. That was perfectly good in the century of innovation, when 25 years later the technology was likely redundant. But, in the century of stagnation, anything new that does come along, is going to be the newest technology for a very long time. Which means it will pay to spend money on R&D, because innovation will be much rarer, but that also means those innovating will expect to get longer to recoup their costs.

Also, it will be increasingly difficult for anyone but the market integrated manufacturer to make money through innovation. Because the changes will be smaller and the distinction between “good” and “bad” innovation will require a detailed knowledge of the market. If you are not a manufacturer with close contact to customers, you are going to be left behind.

Complexity

The rule of innovation is that simple technology change wanted by the consumer comes first, followed by more and more complex technology wanted by the consumer, and finally technology change that the consumer does not want, but which is forced on them.

The low hanging fruit having already been picked, the main changes we will see this century are more complexity (both device complexity and complexity of devices tailored for very specific niche markets) and technology the consumer does not want (such as electric cars and more and more surveillance).

Why is technology stagnating?

The simple fact is all recent technology change is a result of the discovery and use of electricity. Once you have electricity you get cookers, microwaves, radios, telephone, TV computers, but once you have found all the simple uses for electricity, the only new uses are more complex uses. After a century of finding more and more complex uses, only in areas like gaming, is there still substantial room to explore even more complex uses. In most areas, the stimulus of innovation from the discovery of electricity has come to an end.

There’s a rather good discussion between Neil Oliver, Dr John Campbell and Tim Kelly discussing how they became sceptics and what that has meant for them.

There were two interesting questions at the end:

What is the way we should go into the future?
How is the future actually going to pan out? Continue reading →

Jesus was a Palestinian with a religion combining ancient Egyptian (Judaism) and Greek, with undoubtedly a few Italian inspired ideas. It is hard to say, but given his own people turned to Islam, Jesus may actually have preferred Islam to “Judaism”. That is because modern judaism is no more ancient than Christianity or Islam. Modern Judaism is just another “modern” religion invented out of “temple-judaism” that existed around the time of Jesus. All three “modern” religions rejected “temple-judaism” which was more like Ancient Egyptian religion than modern Judaism.

Also like Christianity modern Judaism is based on Greek ideas like the Synagogue – a Greek word for gathering. In other words the idea of a “congregation” was a synagogue and that was a dramatic departure from real temple-judaism which was based on worshipping the one temple.

And I don’t see a lot of commonality with his own religious teachings and hierarchical “Christian religion” … although the same criticism probably holds of both modern Islam and Judaism.

I think Jesus would take a look at the religions claiming all to be the modern version of his own (Greek ideas adapting temple-judaism) and reject the lot of them. But also he would see them each as somehow improving on the temple-judaism of his time. He’d probably have a religious affiliation like the Beetles … rejecting all conventional established “religions” and seeking something better.

Continue reading →

The US has attacked any country that decided to stop using the dollar for international trade. The Chinese and Russians have been supporting the global warming crap as a way of attacking the west. USaid was pouring funds into extremist regimes and as a way to attack Russia and China and the US have been at war with something like 100 countries since WWII.

The US supports Israel which is deliberately murdering children and committing genocide and ethnic cleansing and that is all supported by Trump. The US is attacking Cuba … for not bowing and scraping to the US. Russia supports countries attacked by Israel and many freedom fighters against corrupt regimes kept in power by US corpse money.

Of course global warming is part of the attack on the west, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified.

Continue reading →

Reiner Fuellmich was the face of the Corona Investigation Committee. People donated to this committee and therefore as there was no legal body created to handle the funds, they donated to Reiner Fullmich as a caretaker for the money … there being no legal entity to receive the money.

Reiner took a loan … which is understandable as anyone working to opposing the hefty totalitarianism paid a heavy personal cost and needed all the help they could get, and anyone contributing to the committee would have seen financially helping Reiner to keep going was legitimate, especially if it was simply a loan. Then Reiner decided that he wanted the legal entity to exclude two people who had been initially involved but then stopped their involvement. As such he wanted to pay the money, not to a body that didn’t exist with the original, but to a newly constituted body without the two. NOTHING AT ALL UNTOWARD.

Then the politicised courts start attacking Reiner. To give an idea of the incredible nastiness and vindictiveness, the court deliberately extended the trial, rejected all defence evidence (probably never even reading any) and then added the time the judges extended the trial onto Reiner’s “sentence”.

BOGUS NAZI JUDGES !!

BLATANTLY POLITICISED TRIAL!!

BLATANT VINDICTIVE not MISCARRIAGE BUT ANTI-JUSTICE.

The real global war is about money and who controls global trade, and therefore siphons off an unearned “cut” from all global trade.

Till recently, that was the western bankers (who are not aligned with the west, but merely reside here).

The trade was built on three things:

1. An efficient financial/banking system which means minimum profits … which was true a long time ago
2. Trust in that system, which takes decades if not centuries to establish
3. Habitual use.

After the west stole the Russian money, trust in the western “system” has been taken away. New technology has vastly reduced the costs of financial transactions, but the parasitic financiers still keep taking the same massive cut from every transaction.

So, the only thing keeping the current financial system afloat is “habitual use”. In other words, it is in free fall to collapse … where “free” is how fast habitual usage dies away and other institutions and systems arise to take its place.

The world has changed. The west is now just one of many and others, with far more efficient economies and more innovation and rapidly overtaking the west. They will in future be driving the financial systems and either western finaciers will collapse, or they will rapidly change seeing a sea change in profitability. The old days where everyone in the city of London drove a very expensive car are gone. That kind if money is never going to be around again.

In contrast, there will be a new class of wealthy people, far fewer than the city of London, but wealthy none-the-less, and they will be in the Brics financial centres. And, Russia will have won.

Ukraine was not the battle …. but the coke smoking leaders were clueless.