I often find my views lead the world by perhaps a decade. And, I often find that I’m much more tolerant in my views than the “crowd” or lynch mob as they often become … as people are much more angry when they find they have been conned for a long time.

At the moment, the evidence convicting Mossad of the worst crimes of genocide, ethic cleansing, pimping children, subverting democracy and disrespecting those who died in holocaust and using their deaths to commit even worse atrocities is getting pretty overwhelming.

There is also evidence that the raft of legislation protecting supporters of the Genocide of the original people of Palestine: the Palestinians from any condemnation for killing God’s chosen people … the original people of Palestine … that legislation was pushed using Mossad lies and using politicians who were being blackmailed for their paedophilia.

In other words, people were prevented from questioning the nature of the National Socialist crimes of WWII Germany, because that might undermine the support for the genocide being committed by Israel against the people of the book: the original Jews of Palestine aka the Palestinians.

If I were religious, I would certainly be citing the devil at this point. Because it really is pure evil: Jew against Jew … the genocide of the original Jewish people of Palestine in the name of “the book” by those Jews of European descent. It is only a script the devil could dream up.

The bounce

I hold absolute no grudge against Jew of descent (Palestinian) or via religion (European Jews). But, given the undoubted EVIL of Mossad and the way they are destroying the west, I doubt that the “crowd” will have quite that same view. As the west begins to collapse economically, people will look for someone to blame. And after what Mossad have been doing, they and those who enabled them in their evil, will be an obvious target for any politician seeking a scape goat to get to power.

And, as the west collapses – due to Mossad, the ability of countries in the middle east to take back the land stolen from the original Jews of Palestine (now Islamic), will increase, so, it is quite possible the Jews by religion of European descent will be turfed out by the supporters of the Jews by descent of Islamic religion. Just at a time, when it becomes fashionable to blame Mossad, and those who supported Mossad for all the economic problems created by Mossad and the destruction of the west.

It won’t be a good time to be a wondering people again!

Mossad rule the world

The alternative is that Mossad take over the entire world. Which is what they are trying to do via Ukraine and the regime changed they hoped would occur in Russia. That was a daft idea!

However, even if Mossad could succeed at that wet dream, it will then do to the world what it did to the west (fucked us and destroyed us morally, politically and economically) and that will not end well for the Mossad empire.

It’s just not going to work. The British empire worked because people wanted to be part of the British empire. A mossad empire will be based on hatred, spite, lies and zealotry. It will fall apart very quickly, quicker than it could ever be formed.

I first came across the insane “anti-Zionists” on … I forget the site, but I could not believe they were real. Initially I imagined that they might be real people who somehow had an extreme grudge, but that never made sense.

Eventually I realised that the only way such entities could exist is if they were fake … and the reason to have such fake entities was a “false flag” attack which is the hallmark of Mossad.

In other words, Mossad were running the fake anti-zionists in order to attack Jewish communities and make them feel threatened and thereby want to go the heart of evil, genocide and ethnic cleansing in the middle east.

theinteldrop.org

I’ve just come across a site called theinteldrop.org with an article:

THE INTEL DROP | SPECIAL REPORT
4CHAN HACKED, MOSSAD EXPOSED: THE DIGITAL HONEYPOT THAT CREATED Q-ANON AND POISONED THE AMERICAN RIGHT
By Gordon Duff | April 2025 Continue reading →

I was researching something yesterday and came across something I had never heard of before: “widow” or “widower’s fire”. Apparently it is the absolute compulsion of those who have been made a widow or widower for sex.

It’s obviously not the first thing I thought about when thinking of the death of a loved spouse, but it does make sense.

It also proves, that there is always something new lurking around the corner.

However, I also suspect it was a little overplayed. Looking at “widow(er)s fire” I learnt that it wasn’t at all supported by evidence. There was a tendency for people losing a spouse to buy sex toys for the first time. And so what? That doesn’t support the idea of some kind of psychological condition!! There was also a tendency of older people to get married quickly, because children were not an issue, and their view was “we can’t afford to wait?”

I was in the room when a documentary of Michelle Mone was being played. The next day I was wondering what she was like. How does someone from one of the poorer parts of Glasgow end up marrying what one described as a billionaire?

Unfortunately the torrent of press and BBC hatred was such, that I couldn’t tell much about the real Michelle Mone and certainly nothing about whether I would approve or otherwise of her actions.

But, I did wonder if she liked her life. It’s not a life I would ever chose, but that doesn’t mean Michelle is unhappy. Nor could I tell if she was happy.

However, it was painfully obvious that there was a huge amount of prejudice against her because she came from Glasgow and was not the “right class” for the snooty cows on the  BBC.

I’ve long known that sexual orientation is a complex thing, because so much of what people perceive as being “male” or “female” is looks or behaviour that isn’t intrinsic to one or other sex and is not present in some societies. In particular, I would look at the ugly models presented on TV as “beautiful” and wonder in whose eyes are they the most beautiful women in the world? They weren’t, yet the commentators would go on about how beautiful they were … almost (on reflection) as if they were being paid to say it. And then rather than the anorexic models of the west, I saw African beauty.  Another example: the perception of the attractiveness of large breasts vary dramatically between societies. If the global manhood cannot even decide on a single model of “beauty” then clearly sexual identity is an extremely complex issue with no single answer or cause. So, obviously it is easy to get confused, especially if there are groups deliberately trying to muddy the waters. Continue reading →

The European people of Israel are committing genocide against the original people of Palestine, the original JEWISH people of Palestine, who have not changed, except they saw Islam as a new version of Abraham’s religion. So, quite literally a holocaust against the original Jews, committed by Europeans … with far far less claim to be the original people of that land.

The WWII holocaust, was likewise, the people of Germany murdering people who were closely related to them through interbreeding, but shared a descent from the Jews of Palestine.

In both cases, the act was appalling, but in the case of the “Israelis” killing those CLOSER related to the Jews of the Old testament, the crime is all the worse, because the European Jews KNOW the nature of their crime having experienced it and yet they are killing the people with MORE right to the land than their own which lapsed many many centuries ago.

The Palestinians are “God’s chosen people”. You can argue whether that proves god doesn’t exist, because he isn’t smiting the Europeans invading his land, that he allows his chosen people to be murdered, but you cannot in any way argue their murder is moral.

THE EVIL TORY PARTY

Which brings me to the sickening scum and betrayal of humanity which is the UK Tory party. A party that has argued that it is OK for European Israelis to commit genocide when stealing the land of the Original Palestinian Jews, but it is not OK for those Palestinians to in any way at all put up ANY kind of resistance, even the taking of hostages** … without killing them … no that attempt to stop the invasion of the Europeans is a justification to murder babies according to the UK Tory Party.

It’s easy to see how the National Socialists murdered so many Jews when the UK Tory and Liebour parties are now openly in favour of the holocaust of the original Jewish people of Palestine. The National Socialists would be right at home in the UK parliament and the Tories and Liebour would be howling for more Jews to be murdered if it were WWII now.

**AKA as prisoners … just what the European Israelis have done by grabbing Palestinians with no legal process and holding them without due process for the “crime” of protesting the illegal theft and occupation of THEIR LAND.

I have already upgraded my mobile to a “dumbphone” which now allows me to switch it off and only switch it on when it is necessary to be on and just today I read a comment from someone saying “is it time to ditch the mobile phone entirely”.

I’ve also started filtering emails for any gmail or google emails, and treating them like spam. Because too often I am lured into revealing personal details to google by replying emails containing JUST ONE gmail address. They are a spy in the digital room.

So, the first mistake was that it should have been a criminal offence for anyone except the intended recipient(s) to read an email, without the express permission of the addressee EACH AND EVERY TIME.

The second evil, was that big US corpse were able to get away with the virus/spam attacks to drive people to give up independent software and thus were forced to use those producing the email/spam. Every big US corpse does it. They attack everyone else by manufacturing spam/viruses/bots that make like such a pain if you use anyone else but a big US corpse that huge numbers gave up ALL THEIR PERSONAL DATA to US corpse marketing depts to use to manipulate them. Continue reading →

Perhaps 3 years ago I bough an air fryer, the first new kitchen gadget I had bought in about 30 years. Although to be fair, about 10 years ago I bought a second hand thing for chopping nuts. Yes, I have bought replacements, and for example the replacement tumble drier was a condenser one rather than an air vent.

60 years ago there were no computers, no tumble driers, no double glazing, fitted carpets were rare. 40 years ago the first home computers were being used. Things were rapidly changing. But, by around 2000, almost everything we have now was already available. Laptops, electronic watches, tumble driers, flat screen TVs. Duvets. After a century of innovation, we started to see stagnation.

About the only significant change has been electric cars, a technology so unpopular that they can only get a few idiots to buy it using non-stop advertising. Advertising that will eventually have to end, because there are not enough fools to buy many more.

That is the difference. Last century was technology change driven by consumer demand. This century almost the only change is driven by lobbyists twisting the arm of government to force the more stupid parts of society to buy it.

And, that is now the defining feature of “new technology”. It is not technology change that the consumer wants, but change being forced on people by lobbyists trying to create a market for a product no one wants. It is “innovation” we could have done a century ago (there have always been electric cars), but it wasn’t done because the consumer did not want it.

That is because technology is now stagnating.

The only exception to that rule is within the computer screen. But, that is because computers are still relatively new. Rapidly, all that can be done will be done, and soon people will run out of new things worth doing on a computer and that too will stagnate.

Soon, the pretence of “upgrading” micro$oft will become obvious to most people, when their machine “slows down” and “requires” an “upgrade” which provides exactly the same facilities, just less the Micro$oft created block on performance unless you pay them the bribe of getting a “new” operating system.

People will discover that they can keep the same performance by never upgrading with another operating system and Micro$oft will be no more.

The old business model of forcing the consumer to ditch their old devices by the lure of “something better” is going to disappear, because there will be nothing better to offer. The only business model that will work, is repair, maintenance and replacement. More and more, consumers will want devices with long life and that can be repaired.

Patents

The problem with a patent, is that it only protects and invention for 25 years. That was perfectly good in the century of innovation, when 25 years later the technology was likely redundant. But, in the century of stagnation, anything new that does come along, is going to be the newest technology for a very long time. Which means it will pay to spend money on R&D, because innovation will be much rarer, but that also means those innovating will expect to get longer to recoup their costs.

Also, it will be increasingly difficult for anyone but the market integrated manufacturer to make money through innovation. Because the changes will be smaller and the distinction between “good” and “bad” innovation will require a detailed knowledge of the market. If you are not a manufacturer with close contact to customers, you are going to be left behind.

Complexity

The rule of innovation is that simple technology change wanted by the consumer comes first, followed by more and more complex technology wanted by the consumer, and finally technology change that the consumer does not want, but which is forced on them.

The low hanging fruit having already been picked, the main changes we will see this century are more complexity (both device complexity and complexity of devices tailored for very specific niche markets) and technology the consumer does not want (such as electric cars and more and more surveillance).

Why is technology stagnating?

The simple fact is all recent technology change is a result of the discovery and use of electricity. Once you have electricity you get cookers, microwaves, radios, telephone, TV computers, but once you have found all the simple uses for electricity, the only new uses are more complex uses. After a century of finding more and more complex uses, only in areas like gaming, is there still substantial room to explore even more complex uses. In most areas, the stimulus of innovation from the discovery of electricity has come to an end.

There’s a rather good discussion between Neil Oliver, Dr John Campbell and Tim Kelly discussing how they became sceptics and what that has meant for them.

There were two interesting questions at the end:

What is the way we should go into the future?
How is the future actually going to pan out? Continue reading →

Jesus was a Palestinian with a religion combining ancient Egyptian (Judaism) and Greek, with undoubtedly a few Italian inspired ideas. It is hard to say, but given his own people turned to Islam, Jesus may actually have preferred Islam to “Judaism”. That is because modern judaism is no more ancient than Christianity or Islam. Modern Judaism is just another “modern” religion invented out of “temple-judaism” that existed around the time of Jesus. All three “modern” religions rejected “temple-judaism” which was more like Ancient Egyptian religion than modern Judaism.

Also like Christianity modern Judaism is based on Greek ideas like the Synagogue – a Greek word for gathering. In other words the idea of a “congregation” was a synagogue and that was a dramatic departure from real temple-judaism which was based on worshipping the one temple.

And I don’t see a lot of commonality with his own religious teachings and hierarchical “Christian religion” … although the same criticism probably holds of both modern Islam and Judaism.

I think Jesus would take a look at the religions claiming all to be the modern version of his own (Greek ideas adapting temple-judaism) and reject the lot of them. But also he would see them each as somehow improving on the temple-judaism of his time. He’d probably have a religious affiliation like the Beetles … rejecting all conventional established “religions” and seeking something better.

Continue reading →