Clmategate vs. deniergate, fake-gate or sucker-gate

Note: I’m having problems getting the table formatting to display the internal grid, but I’m going to post now, rather than wait to work out how to get around this.
The following is a comparison of the climategate and Heartland document release. I chose to compare them using the criteria provided by the PCC.  As far as I can see this is a pretty well open and shut case. The publication of information stolen from the Heartland Institute is against PCC code of conduct because there is no public interest and it breaks numerous sections whereas the release of climategate emails was fully justified by public interest.

Name

Climate gate

Denier-gate
/fake-gate
/sucker-gate

Who

University of East Anglia Emails

Heartland Institute

Public/Private

Public

Private

Type of information released

Emails and data

Board-meeting and fund-raising documents

Had it been requested under FOI

Yes

No

Required to be released under FOI

Yes

No

How obtained

Unknown as to whether legal or illegal means used

Obtained by deception.

Was the information accurate or otherwise break the
PCC requirement 1 (I) that “The Press must take care not to
publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including
pictures.”

No.

Yes, both sceptics and non-sceptics agree.a key
document was fabricated.

Was there any breach of the PPC code on privacy 3
(i) Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and
family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital
communications.

Yes

Yes

Were any clandestine devices or subterfuges used in
breach of 10 (I) “The press must not seek to obtain or
publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine
listening devices; or by intercepting private or mobile telephone
calls, messages or emails; or by the unauthorised removal of
documents or photographs; or by accessing digitally-held private
information without consent.

Documents were obtained and it does not appear they
were authorised. However the exact circumstances are unknown and
it remains possible they were lost by the company or otherwise
obtained without resort to clandestine methods or subterfuge

The press clearly published material from messages
which were clearly obtained by an interception of emails intended
to go to a director using a subterfuge in clear breach of this
section.

Was there a public interest defence?

i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious
impropriety.

The information commission ruled that the law on FOI
had been broken.

The is no suggestion of serious crime or
impropriety.

ii) Protecting public health and safety.

Not Applicable

Even if it were argued that global warming is a
threat to public safety, the information published did not provide
anything substantial or anything that could not be reasonably
guessed at by a outside observer using other publicly available
sources on the organisation.

iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an
action or statement of an individual or organisation.

It is generally accepted that the climate scientists
were saying one thing in private and saying something different in
public. The lack of warming is a notable example. This was a
substantial issue which went to the core of their public role and
the public had a right to know it was being misled.

No evidence that the public have been misled by the
Heartland institute has come out of these documents. The only
revelations of any substance are that e.g. Microsoft who publicly
support green issues were donating money but apparently for
appropriate projects.

Was a reasonal attempt made to verify the material
before publication.

Many organisations such as the BBC sat on the emails
for weeks.

Material from the documents was published very
quickly. In the case of the BBC, this was around 12hours and as
their journalist put it: “I have given them an opportunity
to deny explicitly that some of the contents are real, and they
have not done so – ergo, they are real.”

Posted in Climate | 23 Comments

Deniergate – is a scandal!

As I sat down to read the latest gossip before doing something more useful, little did I realise that today would reveal the story that is the final nail in the Global warming scandal.
Deniergate started when someone released a number of documents of which some appear to be genuine Heartland Documents and one clearly isn’t (and there’s no way a professional organisation would produce something like that).
Like climategate there has been a scandal, there may even have been some law breaking (but what was the release of the UEA emails?) But the real scandal is that so many journalists from the Guardian to the Black Propaganda at the BBC were ready and willing to print this story without checking the facts. Continue reading

Posted in Climate | 9 Comments

The unofficial end to global warming?

Inspired by the true story that captured the hearts of people across the world, the rescue adventure Big Miracle tells the amazing tale of a small town news reporter (John Krasinski) and an animal-loving volunteer (Drew Barrymore) who are joined by rival world superpowers to save a family of majestic gray whales trapped by rapidly forming ice in the Arctic. … With time running out, Rachel and Adam must rally an unlikely coalition of Inuit natives, oil companies and Russian and American military to set aside their differences and free the whales. As the world’s attention turns to the top of the globe, saving these endangered animals becomes a shared cause for nations entrenched against one another and leads to a momentary thaw in the Cold War.
(Circle.http://www.everybodyloveswhales.com/story.php)

As the American Spectator put it:

I saw a preview for this on Saturday.  My first thought at the image of three whales hopelessly trapped in the ice pack was that global warming must is now be passé in Hollywood.

Continue reading

Posted in Climate | 5 Comments

Scottish Independence

In the real sense, Scotland has never been a nation. It was always a country of several parts: Gaelic Speaking Highlands and Western Isles, Norse Orkney, Shetland and much of the NE, English/Northumbrian speaking SE.
So, I’m not one of these romantics who think that the “Scots” (the name of an Irish group who took over Pictland in much the same way the Normans took over England) have a inalienable right to “Pictland”.
But, having lived in Scotland most of my life … but also having lived in England and particularly around London, I can see how much of the wealth of the UK has been stolen by the SE. It comes down to something very simple: a minister in London, asks a civil servant to do something. That civil servant then ask their (London) contacts which firm could help and that civil servant then goes to the firm best suited to them in London. Continue reading

Posted in Climate | 4 Comments

lying murdering piece of filth scottish sceptic

It really should be “Happy NewYear”, but no! As I’m still recovering from a bad cough which left me in bed after Xmas I come back to read the comments and someone is complaining that someone else is calling them something that someone would rather that someone else would not call them.
And eventually searching for “lying murdering piece of filth scottish sceptic”, I find something that might be the offending comments. At which point I begin to wonder whether the comments are accurate. Which leads me to think of all the reasons one could justify such comments … which I quickly realise is a ridiculous line of argument as grown men really shouldn’t need to resort to such STUPID name calling.
It really does seem to be common on the internet to find such “flaming”. The lack of personal interaction may be the reason: we can’t see the other side getting more and more irate …. or perhaps it is that we know they are getting irate, but we also feel “safe” behind the protective anonymity of the internet and physical separation.
Unfortunately … or perhaps fortunately for the pair involved, there doesn’t seem to be an easy way on wordpress to penalise/premoderate individuals … except put everyone on pre-moderation.
… And just now on the radio I hear the headline about the man who was stabbed in Perth, which just makes me glad that I’m not trying to arbitrate this dispute in the real world where the outcome of escalating abusive comments could be far worse.
So, all I can say is Happy New Year to one and all!

Posted in Climate | 3 Comments

Met says … 2011 hottest year on record … Lies, damned Lies and Met Office Statistics?

Apparently, when you take Met Office data on climate, they find:

  • It’s been the warmest year UK
  • It’s been the wettest year in Scotland.

So,  very simple question for any Scot (given the dreadful summer and Autumn), is … how on earth has it been so hot UK wide when Scotland has been so cold and wet?
So, where is the figure for Scotland’s temperature? … Apparently, our cold year doesn’t fit the Global warming bullshite of the Met Office propaganda machine.
The fact, is that this year we have seen a change in the position of the jet stream which has brought a series of wet and cold weather to Scotland and drier, warmer weather to England. Because England dominates the statistics, the result is that the UK temperature has been warmer, but apparently, England hasn’t had it’s driest year on record …
… so, Scotland is useful as a filler … not because of our colder weather, but because of the wet.
Happy New Year!
Addendum
Following the post I received this email:

I would like to draw your attention to a couple of errors in your blog post below.
http://scottishsceptic.wordpress.com/2011/12/31/met-says-2011-hottest-year-on-record-lies-damned-lies-and-met-office-statistics/#comments.
In this blog you suggest the Met Office has stated that 2011 is the warmest year on record for the UK. However, this is not the case.  The release you report on which can be found at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2011/december-and-annual-statistics clearly says it is provisionally the second warmest. Please could you correct this error.
For information, Scotland had it’s 6th warmest year on record, and as you highlight – it’s wettest.  To provide more seasonal context Scotland had it’s warmest Spring, second warmest Autumn and 33rd coldest summer on record. (The UK record goes back to 1910)
There is certainly no bias toward England relating to the calculation of statistics.  The methods used for the compilation of UK wide statistics can be found at http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/about/methods.html
The Met Office as the holder of the National Climate Record on behalf of the UK has an obligation to share these statistics with the UK public. The media are always interested in this and for the benefit of the media we pick out the highlights, such as wettest, driest, hottest and coldest.
I would be very grateful if you could correct these errors in your post.
Kind regards
Dave
Met Office Chief Press Officer

Somehow it is all very reminiscent of the spin machine of the new labour tyranny that took this country to the brink of bankruptcy. Forget what is really happening, all that matters is that they have a spin machine to silence any critics of their disastrous policies.
For nearly a decade the Met Office produced a global warming forecast predicting warming of some 0.05C/year and at the end of those nine years the likes of “Dave” produced a press release saying that the Met Office global temperature forecasts had been incredibly accurate because they were only 0.06C/year too warm.
But the real point is that whether or not it was the warmest year … what I heard from the Met Office propaganda machine in the BBC was that it was the warmest year. …. And if I, someone who is keenly interested in the subject … heard it that way, then I’ve no doubt that that was the way that the vast majority of the public heard it … WHAT IS MORE I KNOW THAT IS WHAT THEY WERE INTENDED TO HEAR THE BBC-Met Office WARMIST spin-machine!

Posted in Climate, Fails | 17 Comments

Time to celebrate Global Warming!

Champagne is entering a third great phase of sales success according to Pierre-Emmanuel Taittinger.
Pierre-Emmanuel also spoke of the positive benefits from climate change on Champagne production when addressing those at the masterclass, which was held in London’s Vintner’s Hall, and organised by the Institute of Masters of Wine.
“The last 10 years have been excellent due to the global warming,” he said, referring to the Champagne harvests.
In fact, such has been the quality of the grapes, he added that Champagne’s non-vintage category should be classed as multi-vintage.
Read the entire article here

Posted in Climate | 3 Comments

Proposal for voluntary compliance of FOI law by sceptics

I would like to float an idea. It is only an idea, as I have not thought out the full ramifications – just looking for comments.
We are constantly seeing government paid alarmists denying their obligation under FOI law to disclose relevant information. Given the limited budget of sceptics, there is only so much action under the law we can do – and what action has been taken has been costly and very very slow, without any results as yet. But when people bravely attempts to force compliance with the law by releasing those FOI emails as is required, we see this being ruthlessly & I think illegally squashed by the police.
Sceptics need to find a way to highlight the illegal actions of government employees. We also need a way to stop people believing we are oil funded groups … or if some are, to show that that funding is very limited compared to the massive funding of the alarmists.
So, I have been considering whether it might be possible to set up a system for voluntary compliance to the FOI act for voluntary groups like us sceptics. Continue reading

Posted in Climate | 36 Comments

WUWT – page 35 when searching for "global warming"

Following some comments on WUWT about the “+1” scheme to boost ratings, I first joined the scheme, then decided to do it the old fashioned way and click on the WUWT link when searching for “global warming”.
So, imagine my surprise when I found WUWT on …

PAGE 35 Continue reading

Posted in Climate | 10 Comments

Consultation on Feed-in Tariffs for solar PV

The government have announced a review of feed in tariffs for solar PV. According to their website the review will consider all aspects of the scheme including:

  • tariff levels
  • degression rates and methods
  • eligible technologies
  • arrangements for exports
  • administrative and regulatory arrangements
  • interaction with other policies
  • accreditation and certification issues 

We have decided to separate the review into two phases. Phase 1 will consider:

  • small-scale solar PV (with a total installed capacity of 250 kilowatts or less) Continue reading
Posted in Climate | 24 Comments