There’s no doubt that Thatcher did the Russian’s work and destroyed the UK’s best source of fossil fuels: coal. There is no doubt that later PMs did their best to destroy our other great independent fossil fuel of oil and gas. But why?
The policy is so disastrous for the west in general, and Putin was caught helping the policy along, so I had assumed that the only people who could possibly have wanted the policy were those who wanted to destroy the west.
However after the Epstein-Zionist honey trap was revealed, and then that Trump himself was up to his armpits in the Epstein-Zionist swamp, the shear scale of Zionist control over the west was revealed, alongside not only their absolute lack of concern for the damage those parasites did to their “cash cow” host, but also their incredible stupidity and blind hatred of apparently everyone else on the planet.
So, the principle that the only people who could have supported the insane policy to destroy western energy supplies, could have been those “in open conflict” with the west fell apart. If they felt it gave them an advantage the Zionists would destroy the west without a second thought. And they control the US … so the “mind” behind the people who control NASA and the ilk who created the global warming scam, was not US politicians but the Zionists … at least they took all the main decisions, leaving the grubby details of running government to their underlings in the US.
It has now become clear that the Zionists want to destroy all the countries in the middle east in order to take over all their land, and indeed, their entire nature as shown through the Epstein scandal, is that they will continue expanding their control over any and every government and people that they can until they enslave the whole world.
How do the countries in the middle east survive? Through massive oil reserves. And, therefore wouldn’t the Zionists wish to see the end of oil?
Forget the fact that fossil fuels are the bedrock of the modern economy and that even windmills need fossil fuels to be produced. Forget that an army needs fossil fuels for explosives, forget all the sane sensible facts the “underlings” know about. The Zionists don’t care for the details. They just want to destroy the countries of the middle east and ending oil as a fuel would be the way to do that.
To do that they would need to create a global movement to end oil. And, to do that they would not only have to control the US government through Epstein-Zionist blackmail honeytrap islands, but they would also have to control groups like Greenpiece, Fiends of the Earth, etc. I have no proof that happened, except that someone must have been funding this insane policy against fossil fuels … and that the Zionists have now come into my sights as potential candidates. However, it would explain an awful lot of the strangeness of the whole insanity.
Why was the US the centre of the global warming cult? Why was Nasa … that made it’s living putting people on the top of enormous barrels of fossil fuel and then lighting them in the hope the controlled explosion took them to space by so against fossil fuels? Why has Trump, who is supposedly so hostile to the global warming insanity, done nothing to stop the corruption in the “science”. The answer would be that they are all controlled by the Zionists and the Zionist plan was to end oil use … unless it could be stolen from a country like Venezuela.
It also explains why the “sceptics” in the US were being funded to do nothing but talk. Why every attempt to “do something” was thwarted and why the EU (which appears also to be under Zionist control), has got the worst of all world. No oil, no power, no means to create a military without power and no future. The Zionists needed the US … so they were allowed oil, but the Zionists don’t need the EU, so the cut in oil to hit the middle east has to come mainly from the EU.
So, was Russia behind the policy as well? Let’s put it this way … there is one murder (the insane policy) and I have two suspects in the room both carrying blood soaked knives and looking very guilty.
… however lurking outside is another. And, that is the US who sees the EU as a long term threat. So, it is quite possible the US wanted to see the EU take on their insane cult obsession against oil.
