The more I see of what is happening in Palestine, the more ashamed I am to have anything at all to do with the evil people in the UK and US who are murdering the original people of Palestine.

I can see why people turn to religion, because it is very tempting to say that the devil has returned and is inhabiting the brain of those supporting the zealots invading Palestine. I do not know how they sleep at night. Not since the SS were murdering Gypsies and others in the camps, have we seen such appalling behaviour of such a massive scale supported by so many western governments.

The Holocaust has returned and it is killing the original Jews of Palestine. The only difference is that those Jews stayed in Palestine and remained there till the European invaders started murdering them.

The Germans are rebadging their Taurus missiles to pretend that the missiles Germany will be firing at Russia are not German.

I fail to see the logic. As soon as they are shot down and opened up as they will be, it will be obvious they are German Taurus missiles fired only by German state actors, meaning the German state. At which point, Russia is entitled to respond against Germany accordingly.

What will Russia do?

It may fire similar missiles back at Germany. That is a very plausible and obvious response to the Germans firing missiles at Russia. I don’t think the rest of the world would bat an eyelid, except that Germany has been so stupid as to start a war when it has no capability to fight it.

Russia may cause comparable damage in a way that cannot be directly linked to Russia. It could, for example, cause fires to break out or structures to fall down in a way that they appear to be natural and which cannot be linked to Russia.

It could respond with biological weapons … again in a way that cannot be obviously linked to Russia.

It could assassinate those responsible … not necessarily in Germany.

It could cause actions to be taken that hit German companies globally … by funding rebels etc., to “mistakenly” hit assets that dramatically impact Germany.

The ways it could respond are endless. The one thing that is not happening is no response.

But, it could just save up the response … wait for the appropriate time and then respond when it suits Russia, in a way that suits Russia, and clearly maximises damage to Germany.

WWIII?

… we are now at the stage, that WWIII is going to happen sooner or later. But, whilst it might obliterate the “elite”, it’s not going to have much affect on the rest of us … statistically  unless you live near the “elite”, …  except getting rid of that “elite” who have led us to WWIII.

Likely Russia now thinks the same … WWIII is coming, so why not fight it on their terms?

So, personally,  I think there is a very significant possibility that Russia will simply respond with conventional weapons to destroy Ukrainian assets on German soil.

The aim would not be to trigger WWIII … but to demonstrate that Germany is about to start WWIII.

However, if Russia believes that an appropriate response will trigger WWIII, then … rather than not responding …. logically Russia will start WWIII in anticipation of the response to its response to Germany’s aggression. C’est la vie!

It’s an interesting fact of life that the maximum rate of change of the rate of change when following a sin curve occurs, when it is at its maximum.

So, when you have reached the top … and the land is flat, the rate of change of your projection of the future is changing most rapidly, for at the top the only way is down.

So, the wind scam is now at that peak … so the global warming scam … again at that peak. To those standing at the peak, they think that because it was all uphill to get where they got, they imagine that the future is just a continuation of the rise they had before. But, now it is all downhill.

How do I know? Because the rhetoric has changed. The rhetoric is now totally out of link with what is happening. To put it simply, it all became so profitable, that even the spin doctors couldn’t pretend any longer that it was not just all about money and so, most people don’t want to do anything for the scammers. The little real public support has jumped off a cliff. The only people who still go along with it are all clearly making money from the scam, much to the disgust of the people they conned into supporting their scam.

There is no way back from here. The scammers are digging their own graves … the scam has been very profitable, at huge cost, and it is now impossible to hide that cost from the gullible fools who went along with it.

As someone said not long ago will counts for a lot. And the simple fact is that whilst the politicians still mouth the same platitudes about climate, the will to do anything about it has disappeared. Everything is more important and everything else provides more political payback for a tiny fraction of the cost.

We’re now in the stupid position, where they are not going to spend more money on it but they will announce spending more money time and time again, without actually doing anything. There’s no payback for the politicians. The climate nutters never knew the reality and so they never had a clue what was and wasn’t being spent. So, they can be fooled by the simplest of announcements. The money isn’t there to pay for anything, and there is no payback if they waste the money.

Bizarrely, the less we sceptics say, the less anyone is going to check the figures and see what is actually being spent, because the nutters never cared about the costs.

So this is how it ends. Everyone (else) pretending it’s not ending and knowing it is.

Nut Zero

I reckon, the cost of Nut Zero is excess of  7 trillion for the UK. (Although Nut Zero inflation is already rapidly increasing that). So, the current estimate of some 600 billion is around 10% of the true cost. The true cost having to reflect the fact that Nut Zero puts up the cost of Nut Zero by about 10x. In other words, a windmill that today costs £1million will in a Nut Zero world cost £10milllion, or if you can’t use fossil fuels, it will take ten times as much man-hours to create the same things. That includes wealth, so the same wealth is then divided by 10 people rather than one. That means  that people get paid 1/10 of what they used to be paid. Welcome to the £2000 average wage … or which £3000 goes on government “taxes”.

However even 600billion is a lot higher than they have been admitting, and with the admitted costs bound to rise rapidly, and the implications for everything the people wanted to happen, being they won’t happen, it won’t be long before Nut Zero is being attacked by the Guardian, Met Office, BBC and all the other vile ilk who were so enthusiastically lying about the science to push it on us.

Brics

Brics is now here to stay. And, with it, the new financial system that it brings. And, with that, the end of the mafia who control western finances. And that also means the end of financing to “Israel”, which means the end of “Israel” as a supposed “country”.

The genocidal killers of the indigenous people of Palestine started their war against Iran with the assumption it would be an easy win which would prove their “iron dome” was impregnable to the much inferior Iranians.

Very quickly it was obvious Iranian weapons were getting through and hitting numerous MILITARY targets … unlike Israel and the US who delight at hitting civilians for their “shock and awe” tactics.

Indeed, “Israeli” occupier of Palestine (the Palestinians are the real Israel) made it very clear the Iranians were having huge success when it started censoring ALL reporting of the huge military successes of the Iranians.

We then heard of “Israelis” being PREVENTED FROM LEAVING and buying up land abroad (Cyprus). Clearly many Israelis now see a bleak future for the invaders of the Holy land and murderers of the Indigenous people of the book.

This is an excellent summary of the humiliation for the genocidal “Israelis”:

My summary assessment of the missile war over Israel during the 12-day-long first act of the ongoing war between Israel et alia and Iran et alia:

The first Iranian counterstrike against Israel (14 June) began with a few hundred drones and relatively antiquated subsonic cruise missiles, whose primary mission was to soak up air to air and Iron Dome magazine depth.

Additionally, the IDF claims the Iranians fired over 200 ballistic missiles on 14 June. I think that is probably an exaggeration. But, in any case, the overwhelming majority were older Iranian missile stock and purpose-built decoys.

My sense is that no more than about three dozen strikes in the 14 June attack were carried out by later generation Iranian ballistic missile models. Most, if not all, got through unscathed.

Over the next week (15-21 June), in addition to continuing drone strikes, Iran fired, on average, ~25 ballistic missiles per day (again, according to the IDF).

By this time, reports began swirling in Israeli and western analytical circles that US/Israel air defenses had been severely attrited and were proving to be far less effective than advertised.

US land-based THAAD, SM-3 and SM-6 from US ships in the eastern Mediterranean, and Israeli Arrow anti-ballistic missile interceptors were being consumed at a prodigious rate, but achieving few, if any, interceptions of the few dozens of upper-tier ballistic missiles fired from Iran.

On 22 June, a large Iranian counterstrike took place, including ~100 ballistic missiles.

By this stage of the battle, the Iron Dome had been significantly depleted, and even the slow-flying Iranian drones were defeating it in many instances. THAAD had more or less disappeared, and the Israeli Arrow systems were attesting multiple “malfunctions” and what (based on OSINT video evidence) appeared to be almost frantic firing patterns against single-digit salvos of Iranian hypersonic missiles.

A half-dozen or more Israeli missiles were being fired without success against individual incoming Iranian missiles, which blew right through them, their plasma envelope glowing brightly in the night sky as they streaked down to their targets.

By the time a ceasefire was agreed on 24 June, Israeli and American air defense capability in the theater of battle had reached near-exhaustion, even as the Iranians had begun to employ modest but increasing numbers of impressively capable higher-end strike missiles.

There is no doubt the Iranians welcomed a break in the fighting in order to catch their breath and reorganize their own defenses. But it was the Israelis who were, by far, most desperate to stem the tide of events.

The Israelis suffered damage far in excess of anything inflicted upon them in their history. They also expended long-developed on-the-ground sabotage and intel assets within Iran, and the round-up of those exposed assets continues.

The reality of the US blustery Trump against Iran is becoming clearer:

And, I’ve just watched a video, with has items in the video confirming it was shot in Israel, which show at least a couple of dozen missile tracks and one huge explosion. The streets are empty.

So much for the “iron dome” and the arrogance of Israel that it could never be hit back after yet another premeditated and illegal attack on another peace loving country that the Bully Boy of the middle east constantly attacks.

Israel is losing, because war is mostly about the willingness of non-combatants to support those doing the fighting & accept the consequences of the fight, and Israel is losing big time.

(UK) To fart.

To which we could add: to lie about ending wars.

Trump now gets added to my very short list of major  politicians who have been proven to lie. In other words to have deliberately said something that they knew was not be true.

• Trump … “I will end wars”
• Nixon
• Clinton … I did not have (oral) sex
• Blair … WMD
• Thatcher** … the Belgrano was moving toward the Falklands

If you wonder why I have not added Zelensky … firstly I don’t read or listen to him and secondly he’s not a major politician … just a bit part.

**Thatcher may as well have been a USSR agent for all the damage her government did to the UK (together with USSR controlled unions who pushed her toward the most destructive path), however whilst she did lie about the Belgrano, I have never been certain she intended to lie … or just arrogantly assumed it must have been sailing toward the Falklands … and no one told her otherwise. I add her, not because I am sure she deliberately told a falsehood, but because I never got the sense that it mattered to her that she told that lie … and that to me, suggested some degree of condoning the lie she told.

As expected the EU/US/Israel have decided to give up on Ukraine.

Now I saw this:

Middle East Eye: Israel and US exhausting supplies of ballistic missile interceptors, source says Israel is racing against time to destroy Iran’s launch capabilities as interceptor supplies run thin, former officials say

The reason the US gave up on Ukraine, is because the Epstein Islanders are run by Israel, so the project of Russian Regime change through Ukraine suddenly becomes unimportant the moment the US’ Israeli masters decides to attack Iran. But, they’ve already used up their resources. Continue reading →