Apparently the evil Starmer wants to go to war with Russia. Apart from a lot of dead British soldiers and the quick removal of Starmer, I can’t see anything coming of it. But, it does beg the question: “what would it take to win a war with Russia”?

To be honest, the only way to win, was the way the US-UK-Israeli deep state tried, and that was regime change in Russia. A tactic, that spectacularly failed, because Russians now see more than ever, that they must put Russia first because there are many people who want to destroy Russia.

The second caveat, is that anything Britain did, would simply be matched by Russia, so even if there were some insane idea to take on Russia, the Russia being faced, would not be the Russia of today, but a much more war-prepared Russia.

The third caveat, is that in order to win a war against Russia, almost literally everything the UK establishment have been doing since WWII would have to be reversed. And, that means replacing the British establishment. In other words, the British establishment are the biggest hurdle to winning a war, that only the British establishment wants to fight. They made their own bed, they can lie in it!

Having said the above, the three things that are key are:

1. Secure and abundant=cheap energy supplies, because energy is the foundation of any war machine.
2. A massive manufacturing base, particularly in the heavy industries which are critical to the mass manufacture of armaments. Which is impossible without cheap energy, mining and global trade for things that cannot be secured at home.
3. A population who would not so much support a war, when it starts, but will support a war and the war machine and the war sacrifices during the darkest days. That requires a belief in “Britain” and people being proud to be “British”, something the UK establishment has been attacking for decades. But, without troops and a population supporting the troops fighting “for Britain”, you’ve lost any war before it starts.

The next issue is the war mongering industrial-military complex, which seeks only to line its own pockets. The result is that it focusses the idiots in power onto the highly complex equipment that is hugely expensive and profitable. They do not win wars …. unless by “war” you mean viewer figures for the TV news. They look good, but they cannot defeat an enemy with the will to keep going.

Real war is won by logistics. Something I touched on in my article about Boudica’s last battle. High tech weapons are just the rather small and pathetic fairy on top of the logistics Christmas tree. Without the logistics tree, they are just a rather stupid toy in a box.

So, if I were preparing for war with Russia, I’d “make sure” (to use a euphemism like collateral damage) that the present industrial-military complex was not around. They do not help win a war with Russia, and they need to be “taken care of”.  Because you could not be diverted away from what is needed, by those whose only interest is their own profits.

But …

What I have done, is taken away all the forces that are pushing the UK to war with Russia. It is the people who took over and created a Britain who cannot now win a war with Russia, who have to be removed to win a war with Russia, and then there is no reason to go to war with Russia.

And the Russians know that.

So, arguably, they want the same idiot anti-Russian racists to remain in power, the same insane “hi-tech” industrial-military complex in charge of strategy, because they make it impossible for the UK establishment to win a war with Russia. So, arguably, the Russians cannot afford to win a war, because that might just give the people, the kick up the arse to get them to change those in power so that a war with Russia could be won.

So, arguably, Russia’s only way to win outright … is to ensure it doesn’t too obviously win this war. So, for Russia to win, it needs the establishment morons … to believe they “won”.