Scottish Sceptic

For more than a year, I have been working out how to survive nuclear war and the result is that I am now quite convinced that the majority of people would easily survive … and that there are things we can do to help push us from the group that dies to the group that survives. Yes, large numbers will die in a nuclear war, that is a given, but that is very different from everyone will die. That is a lie.

But, having worked out that survival isn’t that difficult, I’ve hit a problem. As a sceptic, I need to check my work, and so I’ve tried to find people who I can discuss the subject with. But, despite finding so called “prepper”, “survival” or “bushcraft” sites, which you would imagine would be delighted to discuss how to survive a nuclear war, the opposite is the truth. Every discussion on surviving WWIII has either been shut down or targetted with doomsayers pushing the lie that death is inevitable.

Why would people do that? Why would sites claiming to be discussion forums for survival … implying a very positive attitude to surviving … repress discussion on how to survive nuclear war? It’s all been very odd and I’ve struggled to explain it!

There seems two most likely reasons:

1. People are trying to stop serious preparation for a nuclear war – because they don’t want “other people” (meaning people like me) to survive
2. People are trying to stop serious preparation for a nuclear war – because they think preparation will make a war more likely.

Either way, it appears that so called “prepper” sites, aren’t what they claim: they are run by people who don’t want anyone to actually prepare for a nuclear war. To put it simply, the forums claiming to be “prepper” sites are not to encourage preparation, they are intended to stop preparation! That is very easy to do: add a lot of stupid “conspiracy” posts about “the great reset” and that puts off most people who see the sites discussing deliberately created “conspiracy theories” and they think preparation looks idiotic … and if anyone (like me) attempts to have a serious discussion … that then gets repressed, censored or demoralised so that the discussion never goes any where.

At which point, I would like to say “well … it doesn’t actually matter” because a nuclear war is unlikely. However, one of these options (that they don’t want us to survive), seems to imply the existence of a doomsday cult which is actively pushing us toward nuclear war, in an attempt to kill the vast majority of humanity. If so, that would make a nuclear war very much more likely.

At which point I have to do a sense check: can I really believe that there are people who would push something that would kill millions. That sounds utterly crazy, but unfortunately, the truth is that there could be such people, because that is what Net Zero is. Net Zero is a doomsday cult attempting to destroy the entire modern fossil economy upon which billions of people rely to survive.

So, I cannot dismiss the doomsday cult on the basis that people would have to be insane to push it, because they have to be insane to push Net Zero. There are insane people around … so the argument that “you have to be insane to kill billions” … doesn’t mean there aren’t people trying to kill billions.

Why would a doomsday cult want to kill humanity? Because there are people who believe that humanity (meaning everyone else) is a “plague” on the planet destroying all the wildlife. And, it is true that much of the wilderness has been destroyed by human population growth. So, it is possible that there is a cult that thinks the planet cannot be “saved” until almost every single human (except themselves) is killed.

And, there are people who are openly talking of population reduction … a euphemism for mass murder. So, there are already people openly supporting the mass murder of huge numbers of people. It doesn’t take a lot to go from mass murder of large numbers, to mass murder of everyone (but themselves). It is not a scenario that can be easily rejected.

I need to think about this.

Upon reflection: The most obvious explanation is that people running “prepper” sites are eco-nutters who hate the idea of nuclear war. However, that makes it quite possible that they would have bought into the “Great reset” population annihilation cult. I therefore should keep my mind open to the possibility that we are being deliberately manipulated into nuclear war intended to “end humanity” (except the “chosen”). Open to the possibility, doesn’t mean it is happening, or is going to happen … it just means I should double check anything that might indicate whether such a cult is in action.

Although the end of the insane green was inevitable, that didn’t mean the non-science couldn’t continue longer than I could reasonably expect to live. However, that doesn’t seem to be a problem now, as there is every sign the green bubble is starting to burst.

The climate scam is falling apart, the woke scam is falling apart, the Russian hatred is falling apart, the US military-industrial empire is falling apart.

What comes next?

We’ve now got to the stage, where there are many many people who are sceptical and who know more about the current climate than I do. Good for them. But, I’m not doing much good just being another voice in the growing chorus against the climate madness. The sake of woke, the same of Russian hatred, and … well the US committed suicide, and it’s hard to have any sympathy given the number of people they have killed and lives destroyed.

But what comes next?

There is no doubt there will be a swing back from the insanity of delusional classes (Former “political elite”). You cannot become like a dribbling delusional madman, and not pull back. But I doubt it will be a full sweeping of all things environmental etc. Is it possible we get a new form of “traditional puritism”, where all things modern are rejected and we return to ideas of traditional roles in society … albeit updated?

Will there be a movement against the evil global carteliers like Google-You-Censor and Fascist book? Or will Google-you-Censor who googled and brainwashed the world, become a woke turncoat and lead the revolt against woke?

Woke, has not exactly been a success. It hasn’t helped the poor, and it hasn’t helped the rich, it has only really been the pet project of a few ultra rich who couldn’t care if they earn money or not. It doesn’t have long term prospects … it will be ditched.

The problem for the climate idiots was a very simple one. Nut Zero is great in theory … but universally hated in practice.

And let me be clear … if Nut Zero were a diet plan, then we’re only at the stage of buying dozens of “low calorie” dishes and then eating them AS WELL AS the high calorie foods. There has been no reduction in CO2 globally. There has been no weight loss … yet still the populace are revolting. The morons like Handsome have lost. The science is clear: it isn’t a problem, the economics is clear: it cannot be justified, the engineering is clear: it can’t be done, the politics is clear: the public hate it.

To be honest, I thought the scam would have more staying power. If I had known how quickly the scam would fall apart, I would have been encouraging its “adoption” long ago.

The only remaining question is this: what is the next appalling fad going to be?

LOL!!!

The evidence shown by the new pathology of white blood clots linked to the jab is quite conclusive: the jab was deadly and we now have the “smoking gun” of the white blood clots.

Anyone who took the jab who learns about these white blood clots will be seriously worried.

It’s only a matter of time now, before those responsible feel their wrath.

I posted yesterday about the covid scandal breaking in the next one to two years, but then I realised that Russia is going to defeat Ukraine and the US in much the same timescale. Likewise, Israel looks to be getting a bloody nose … as the world gangs up against it and will support the 1967 demarcation, whether Israel or the US or the elite in the UK, approve or not. They won’t have much choice about it. Likewise, it’s been looking like the financial crisis will hit us … again the next couple of years is a likely timescale. And, the illegal policy of mass break-ins to our country, is growing and growing as a hot issue. As for the climate scam … even I’m beginning to forget it’s still an issue. It’s dying before my eyes … again, the next couple of years will be a game changing there as well.

The die is cast, the Rubicon was crossed (a long time ago) … and a few others. What is going to happen, is going to happen and there isn’t a lot I could do about it, even if I wanted.

I am reminded of the instructions on fireworks … “light fuse and retire quickly before you get blown up”. Likewise, I did what I could to stop the fireworks, but whilst I cannot stop the show, I can at least see them coming and get the hell out the way.

Merry Christmas and make the best you can out of 2024!

Why am I so certain the covid scandal is breaking? Because the intensity of debate has dropped! That is the odd thing. People who used to be extremely upset that other people weren’t listening, and were all too ready to complain about the cover-up etc., are now starting to be quiet. That might be taken the opposite way I do: that the issue is dying down. But, instead, it appears to me, that those who have long been fighting for other people to listen to the evidence, have started being listened to, and that is why thy are less intense about the subject. But, those who have started listening, have not yet themselves either accepted the situation that the jab was a really bad idea, or grasped the true horrific implication.

At some point, what was originally those who did not take the jab, trying to convince other people not to take the dangerous medication, will start to change to those who did take the jab, leading the issue. At that point, we will start to see an exponentially increasing level of concern.

How rapid?

I cannot think of any parallel, where an overwhelming majority of people have been so severely impacted by such a massive withholding of information and mass “nudge” campaign of lies and deceit. The closest historical parallels are the German National Socialists, but after they were defeated, which is the equivalent of the scandal breaking, there was no need for Germans to act to defeat those who had lied and abused them. There was no struggle by the non-National Socialists against the propaganda machine of the National Socialists. But with the covid jab, the National Socialists are still in power in the nudge unit and NHS.

So, there will be a battle, and that battle will be fought by those whose livelihood and reputation stands … and falls … on their appalling decisions during the covid scandal, against those who have been damaged by their appalling decisions.

But, I do think that battle is going to be pretty intense.

I can’t help thinking it will take two years of utterly insane levels of media hysteria to bring down the nudge unit and NHS National Socialists who are responsibl. So, we can more or less clear the media schedules for 2025,2025 & 2027 as being solely devoted to getting compensation for the jab, and but ultimately turning toward a very vicious campaign to put in jail those who were “responsible”. And, let’s be honest, the politicians who find themselves in charge in 2027 … are not going to shirk from throwing people to the baying crowd.

In 2020 or early 2021, I predicted that the covid scandal, anThere … done!d particularly the covid jab scandal, would break in about 5 years, or 2025. The prediction now looks to be right. Which made me start thinking about the post-breaking culture.

The main organisations who will be pushing for “compensation” for the covid jab, are going to be the same organisations who were encouraging talk of concentration camps with hints of National Socialist style executions. For there is nothing that a massive amount of self interest won’t do to change the mind of BBC “journalists”. So, there is absolutely no issue for them doing a handbrake turn through 180degrees and starting to campaign on entirely the opposite front, and that is for “compensation” for the ” ‘vaccine’ injured”.

Of course, they won’t actually be interested in the people who have suffered greatly from the jab, just as they have no interest in those who suffer fuel poverty or suffer from the regular vagaries of normal natural climate. But, those were just past ways to create filler for the BBC. The damage done by the Covid jab, however, is something very personal to these journalists. If they went on and on and on and on and on about climate which was doing nothing, just imagine what they will do about the covid jab that has likely seriously impacted the future of their health. They are not going to accept the fact that no one really knows how much damage they’ve done to themselves, nor what, if anything, might be done to reduce it (save a time machine and not taking any of the jab).

Fortunately, the current risk only looks like reducing life expectancy by about 10%, or perhaps 5-10 years for the average person. That is about the same order of magnitude as smoking, so it is one that people can and will tolerate without too much fuss. But, not for the health fadist, “the world must do precisely as I order” BBC journalists. They will not be able to tolerate such a “massive” reduction in life expectancy, and worse, those hypochondriacs with zero understanding of science will be totally incapable of handling the fact that no one really knows what health disasters awaits them.

So, just as they have taken every other subject, from climate to covid itself, and blown them totally out of proportion to any credible “threat”, so, with the jab, they are going to do the same and convince themselves that it is the end of the world.

So …. I thought I would just get this in very early:

I am already sick to death with the BBC going on and on about the need for the ” ‘vaccine’ injured” to get compensation, and how every other bit of medical research now needs to be shelved to focus solely and exclusively on the problems of those who took the jab.

To be serious, I’m not looking forward to these BBC nutters finally having a real issue with real implications, which just happens to directly affect them.

The Net Zero extremists, were only ever a small minority, yet the majority allowed them to get away with murder, quite literally because many people have died due to the fuel price rises, the policies of food price rises, the destruction of forest to grow “green” crops etc.

Fortunately, and as I rightly predicted, the cost of net zero was not just eye watering at the time they started on the insanity, but net zero has put up the cost of net zero, so that the costs increase every step of the way so it literally is an impossible target to reach except by giving up all pretence to a modern economy.

And, fortunately, the costs now cannot be hidden as they were on electricity bills where the costs of the green taxes were hidden by being charged on the supplier and not the consumer.

So what happens now?

Net zero will not go away. Politicians will continue to claim that they are all in favour of Net Zero, but they will not do anything at all about it, because only a tiny group of extremely rich and lazy students with nothing else to worry about, will imagine that Net Zero is a priority. It will now stand aside the ambitions to get rid of poverty (when poverty is defined as below the average income), or to get rid of crime … whilst not changing any spending or priority to achieve that.

Indeed, I think we will start to see, just as they have recently, flying off to an oil producing country to talk about ending oil and oil use, we’ll see  politicians embracing “more oil” along with “Net Zero”.

Which, means they will be inventing a new name for the meaningless platitude. “Climate friendly” might be such a term. As in “we are committed to climate friendly policies”.