Year after year gullible green=naive activists are being used and abused by BIG ENVIRONMENT (the BIG BUSINESS which now makes its money feeding from the trough of public money). Like the  well intentioned but gullible interns at the EPA, these starry eyed activists get involved with BIG ENVIRONMENT get abused and used for a few years to line the pockets of the few, and then most just grow up realise they’ve been used and find something better to do with their lives.
But the fact is that like the sexual predators at the EPA and Pachauri of IPCC, there always will be another group of starry eyed interns for everyone in BIG ENVIRONMENT to abuse.
For  it’s not just those at the EPA and IPCC who ask them to swallow and not spit. Because people like Clinton are also abusing these well intentioned interns to create a thin veneer of cool-young-green cream to smother the truth: that those like Clinton are not environmentalist in any shape or form as they fly on their personal jets all over the place.
In that age old fairytale scenarios, those politicians like Clinton jumping on the global warming bandwagon, are really just squeezing the youth of their vigour to concoct a “Youth” beauty cream – one with these old hags think will allow them to pass themselves off as “young and fashionable” and “environmental” to the gullible young voter.
Well my view is that its time people like Clinton, the EPA, Pachauri, stopped using these young interns for their own gratification and these interns had the guts to tell the world just what crap they have to swallow from these old hags.

 

I said it was a like a sweet shop. But the only reason I’m posting this story is I just love the idea of “Carbon dating” … which I presume is a burning desire to get attached to some rich heir (O’h dear)

Fossil Fuels May Be Screwing Up Carbon Dating

However, if I stop throwing puns. Carbon dating uses the amount of C14 in carbon samples. The level of C14 is constantly varying due to cosmic rays, volcanic emissions etc. So, this is a complete none story as C14 dating has always had to cope with the changing levels of C14 in the atmosphere and if geological fuels are changing that, then it’s no different to normal.
And for info, you may often hear a reference to the C14 date and the “calibrated date”. The calibrated date is just factoring in the change of C14 level in the atmosphere.

I feel like a kid in a sweet shop not knowing what stories to put on my blog.
Having been  in the West of Scotland a few weeks ago and seeing snow still on the hills, this story doesn’t surprise me:

Global warming update: There’s still snow on the ground in Buffalo

And as I just can’t help it remember this:

According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html

However … I can’t let a reference to Buffalo disappear without mentioning the strangest English sentences. To buffalo means confuse. Buffalo Buffalo are the buffalo of Buffalo. So …

Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

Addendum
Just for fun … I wonder … if I were to suggest “To gullible” means to pull one over and then say that “Green = gullible”, Then I could say:

Gullible gullibles gullible gullible gullibles

There is just so many news stories speaking so loudly against the global warming scam that I’m starting to get overwhelmed.
The simple fact is that the climate extremists are completely demoralised. I can’t go onto a forum without finding it full of sceptics (unless they don’t have comments or like the UK Guardian exclude sceptics).
This article (about a climate extremist) is quite good example and explains the change:

Author Maria Taylor explores how Australia went from being at the forefront of climate change action to the world laggards.

‘The science risk messages didn’t change. What changed is the story that Australia’s political leaders and the mass media together told the public,’ says author Maria Taylor. http://www.echo.net.au/2015/07/how-australia-buried-the-will-to-act-on-climate-change/

In other words, the press and politicians stopped gullibly swallowing the climate extremism emanating from academia and … guess what? …. the climate extremists in academia don’t like it! (Hard cheese!)
But more importantly, as far as I am concerned they are now admitting to themselves that they have lost.
Because only when they start admitting they’ve lost credibility will they have that opportunity they need. That opportunity is to look at the whole issue realistically and realise that the issue is not with the public or us sceptics, but with academia’s own poor standards of work and the biased eco-activist, anti-business anti-industry culture of academia

I nearly spilt my cocoa when I read this in the Guardian:

Hillary Clinton’s climate change plan ‘just plain silly’, says leading expert

The Guardian is absolutely obsessed with climate non-science publishing around three articles a day. And about the only politicians worldwide to support them are a few idiots in the Democrats. And now they start tearing into Clinton in the run up to the US election!

Crazy!!

Watching the end of this global warming scam is really like watching a slow car crash. The Dead parrot talks in Paris are already a failure. Clinton looks unelectable. The UK government are steadily dismantling all the non-science policies. The EPA is filled with sexual harassment scandal like the IPCC.
Of course, what the climate extremists in the Guardian actually want is what all extremists want: immediate surrender of the whole world to their extremist demands. And to give Clinton her due, she might pretend to be green as she needs every vote she can get, but at least she’s not actually intending to do much – nor does she actually believe the climate crap – just like almost every other politician on the planet!
The simple fact is this: the global scam is dead, it has been dead for a while – but like the dead parrot it’s been “nailed to the perch” –
https://youtu.be/npjOSLCR2hE
and it would have died years ago if hypocritical politician like Clinton didn’t think they could get a few more votes by lying about their support for the climate extremists.

Come on!!
It’s time to kill this scam off completely and stop pandering to the green=gullibles!

I found this article on http://www.ecoequity.org but as honest admissions of “failure” may quickly disappear, I’ve copy and pasted it here.

Still Losing, After All these Years

Since we’re coming up on the Big Paris Meeting, and since it’s more or less inevitable that it’s going to be widely judged to be a failure, it’s worth noting that the DivestInvest movement is also failing to deliver the big breakthrough that we need. This, at least, according to a piece called Fossil fuel industry still winning the investment war that Alex Kirby just published over at Climate News Network.

What’s the problem. Just the impacable force of fossil capitalism as usual. The economics of renewables are ever better, but as far as the investment industry is concerned, that’s no reason to scale back of fossil investment, not even fossil investment that is unlikely to pay off at anything like the expected rate. If at all.

I don’t bring this up to be snarky. The fact is that nothing is working . . . yet. But DivestInvest is a key piece of the puzzle, even if it’s not the silver bullet that its boosters imagined.

There isn’t going to be any silver bullet. Not unless you count the overarching ethos of the movement. To wit: we’re in this together, and we better start acting like it.

To be honest I feel sorry for guys like this. As the blurb says: “EcoEquity is a small, activist think tank”. Which usually means some enthusiastic well intentioned people who are being used by BIG ENVIRONMENT to line their own pockets.
Usually they don’t earn much money from the scam and so they are as much victims of this climate scam as we sceptics.
This is why we’ve got to go all out to stop this scam now … because everyone, including these people have something better to do than waste in on this stupid scare which even those lining their own pockets know is coming to an end.

So who will rid me of this climate scam?

The name  “Scotland” means the land of or belonging to the Scots. There’s little disagreement that the “Scots” are a people who came to Scotland from Ireland and eventually took over the Pictish kingdom that much is clear, but who were these Scots? And what truth is there (if any) in the various legends connecting the Scots to Scota supposedly a princess of Egypt?

http://mons-graupius.co.uk/index.php/archaeology/104-the-eastern-origin-of-the-scots

(In the past this would have been published here, but I’ve now separated out my historical work onto another website. But as this is part of the reason I chose to be called: “Scottish Sceptic”, i.e. scepticism about the origin of the “Scots”, I include a link to the new article)

I’ve always been interested in archaeology and “survival”, but when I did an archaeology course at Glasgow University I found these two interests coalesced in the question: “what did people in Europe eat 10,000BC?”
So, when I heard channel 5 was doing a program called “10,000BC” I watched and dissected this to see what I could learn. Continue reading →

There are some politicians for whom no bandwagon is too crazy or extremist for them to jump on it, read the prepared lines from some lackey and then move onto the next “cause”.
Watching from Scotland I’ve been amazed how easily she has been torpedoed by the republicans. They used to say that mud never stuck to her husband  – but for Hilary it seems to be like some heat seeking missile that just follows her.
After the email scandal where she was caught using a private computer to bypass public disclosure laws, we now have this:

Hillary Clinton Launches Global Warming Push, Then hours later gets caught on video boarding private jet

The plane reportedly burns 347 gallons of jet fuel per hour, costing nearly $6,000 per hour to rent. Continue reading →