I’ve many times followed comments regarding 911 only to find an unconvincing argument saying that there was some kind of conspiracy. The most worrying aspect was the spontaneous collapse of a building that wasn’t hit.

The other worrying aspect was that the CIA bosses were informed of a potential incident like that which occurred and did nothing with the information … just the same as the supposed gunman who tried to “assassinate” Trump was in full view of police marksmen for several minutes whilst he supposedly aimed at the president. That was obviously codswallop, although that could either support an attempt by the state to kill Trump or a fake “assassination”.

However the latest research on 911 is quite convincing. (Link) Obviously I have no way to validate the author’s credentials, nor the data on the flight paths. However assuming those are correct, I was immediately shocked by the statement that the flight paths were not direct. To be fair, I had heard of “last minute manoeuvrers”, but I took those to be extreme measures by someone who thought they were about to miss the target.

Instead, it turns out that the “last minute manoeuvres” were quite complex changes in flight occurring a long time before the impact. And occurring in at least two flight paths in the same way.  They are not compatible with a “last minute panic”. Indeed, they are not compatible with common sense.

I’ve played on flight simulators, and to be honest, I have deliberately crashed the plane into something. And, as the paper suggests, I searched for the target and then took a very direct line toward it. It just would not make any sense to approach the “problem” any other way.

So I was quite perplexed to find that the planes took a very obtuse flight path. For the twin towers the planes made an apparently deliberate and pre-planned last minute turn. That is just crazy and as expected it was extremely difficult to achieve even after a lot of practice even by experienced pilots. For the Pentagon it involved a rapid descent in which the Pentagon was lost from eyesight. That just isn’t realistic, and again the manoeuvre proved incompatible with any common sense flight path.

Could they all be mistakes?

In order for the paths that were taken to have been taken, it would need to be an unplanned route. But I know from my own experience, that if I wanted to hit a particular side of the building, I would fly around the building till I was roughly heading in the right direction and then I would take a well rehearsed and direct path flight in. Especially if I were intending to commit suicide. Human nature would always find an excuse not to commit suicide. So, anyone planning a suicide flight is going to do it in a very rehearsed way and easy to execute way to minimise the opportunity for excuses for “missing”. Likewise the Pentagon is going to be hit with the simplest descent. That means lining up the building in the centre of the window and keeping as direct a route to the building as possible. There is no way that anyone would attempt to a steep dive that loses visual contact with the target and then “fly at ground level” into the building. They will line up the building and fly a direct line attempting to avoid any changes in flight from that direct line.

Could it be explained by some structural issue of the building meaning some non-obvious flight path is optimum … NO!! Even with the simplest flight path, there is still a high risk for an inexperienced pilot of missing a building. No amount of simulation can prepare for the real world. There could have been cloud, fog, a mistaken building identity. This is a one-shot mission, with an extremely high chance of failure, because no one naturally commits suicide and no simulator can prepare someone for the reality of killing themselves.

Summary

Means

Assuming the facts are correct, my conclusion is that the facts are incompatible with a suicide flight by amateurs. The only viable alternatives is that some very experienced military grade fighter pilots killed themselves, or that the planes were remotely controlled.

Motive

The same as the illegal Zionist war against Iran, to convince the gullible US public to support a war to destroy a potential military competitor to the Zionist takeover of the middle east. It clearly wasn’t anything to do with Al Kidya … they weren’t in Iraq. Iraq was nothing to do with 911, yet the US-Epstein class chose to link 911 to Iraq. The only way to link them was a lie, which implies that 911 and the supposed link to Al Kidya was a lie. (We knew that before this research).

Additional

It is pretty clear that Dr David Kelly of the WMD dodgy dossier was murdered, and so it is now pretty certain he was murdered by the same people for the same reason: to enable the Zionist attack on Iraq.

We have been told by an MI6 operative, that Princess Di Survived the car crash and was murdered in the ambulance taking her away because she was going to start working for Palestinian rights.

Charlie Kirk was murdered because he was growing sceptical of the Zionists.

Kennedy was telling the Zionists they could not have nuclear weapons and then he was murdered.

We know the USS liberty was attacked by the Zionists as a false flag attack to blame the Arabs during the six day way, all with the foreknowledge of the US president.

Individually, I might still have some scepticism, but put together there is a clear pattern of lies and murder all pointing back to the Zionists. The one I was not sure about was 911. The motive was clear, but except for one video saying that debris from the plane that hit the Pentagon was not a commercial jet liner, I had no confirmatory evidence. This latest research (assuming the facts are correct), is confirmation that 911 wasn’t a terrorist attack. Based on all the other Zionist involved plots, it is most likely some form of US/Zionist involved false flag attack.

Sense Check

I’ve reread the discussion of “alternative scenarios” and I cannot see any flaw in the reasoning and so the conclusion seems valid.

Is it possible that someone else planned the attack to blame on Zionists? That seems an incredibly hard argument to make. I’ve never seen a hint of any group capable of this scale of attack being considered for anything similar. Someone somewhere would have suggested alternatives if there were viable alternatives.

Is it possible that the Kennedy assassination was a “lone gunman” who for some unknown reason wanted to kill the president and himself? I’ve never seen any plausible explanation for the behaviour. The only beneficiaries I know from the replacement of Kennedy by his vice president were the Zionists.

Diana survived the car crash. I is incredible that a healthy person who I think was walking around afterwards, should die in the ambulance in a way that they could not be revived. I can’t imagine a mechanism that would do that, which wouldn’t have left such obvious clues that we would all know about it. A car crash even at 80mph, is easily survival as all formula 1 drivers will testify. The only way for Di to have died is if she had to be dragged from wreckage with obvious severe injuries, that did not happen.

Does anyone go out with a blunt penknife to kill themselves? NO!!! And, even if they tried, they would not succeed. A Weapon’s expert knows a lot about dying and they know how to do it quickly and effectively. If they decided to do it, it would be quick, minimising pain and very thorough. That is totally incompatible with a blunt pen knife.

Conspiracy Theories

The simple truth is that the whole modern genre of conspiracy theories was invented by the CIA to cover their U2 spy plane operations by filling the local media with false claims of UFO. It’s also clear from the deluge of conspiracy theories which needs a huge budget, that a massively well funded group like the CIA must have been funding many other conspiracy ideas.

That doesn’t mean every wacky idea is a conspiracy theory invented by the CIA, but a hell of a lot of them are. It also doesn’t mean they are the only ones engaged in these false leads and coverups, but some must be linked to the CIA.

As such, I originally thought that the CIA had invented many of the theories to try to cover up their own mishandling of events. However, I am now forced to face the fact that the planes must have been remote controlled. And, at least the Pentagon one wasn’t a civilian aircraft. That begs the question as to what happened to the supposed passengers, but if you are killing 20,000 in the towers, what are a few extra passengers?

At one point I might have questioned whether any human could have could blooded killed 20,000. Then I saw the cold blooded murder being committed by the Zionists in Palestine, and it’s very clear they could and are doing it.

Is it possible that the 911 “remote controlled aircraft” idea is itself something created by some group. Yes it is. But if so, I don’t know who it would be. The only candidates for creating the conspiracy are people who would be on the US “intelligence” radar and unless they are complicit, they would be detected.

I just don’t see any plausible way to put the evidence available, or even a sceptical view of the available evidence, and come up with a coherent alternative explanation other than a US-Zionist plot. The only contender would be e.g. Russian intelligence trying to discredit the US or Zionists. But from observation, the Russians are useless at the kind of propaganda needed to create conspiracies. It’s just not the way they work. The Zionists might try to create a conspiracy … but why would the Zionists want to implicate Zionists?

As a fictional character (didn’t) say: “when you have removed all the impossible, what is left, no matter how improbable …”

I have rapidly removed every other culprit than the Zionists and am left trying to imagine “dark forces” other than Zionists that could have a motivation to have committed yet another act of mass murder of civilians. Drug cartels? Are about the only candidate I can come up with in desperation. Why would they get involved in 911? Whatever I think of, has another far simpler way to do it.

I cannot see any flaw … there is only one tenable candidate left.

Can we explain the behaviour by a belief the planes would be hit if they were aiming for the towers?

No. That might wash for the first plane, but as soon as one hit the towers, it would be obvious what the second was going to do. As such, they would head direct for the tower. And, if there was a belief the plane would be hit, then a real suicide pilot would chose a flight path that would hit the building whether or not the plane was hit by a missile. That might suggest a very steep and direct dive like a dive bomber. It does not involve a last minute sudden turn.

The Shear Scale

The big problem with saying it was “remote control” as it appears, is that as I implied the shear scale of the thing would certainly bring it onto the US intelligence radar. And, that makes it a massively complex operation … and so evil, that it is hard to imagine any intelligence agency being able to support it.

However, we know the USS Liberty was hit by the Zionists with the knowledge of the then US president. So, the US has form in allowing the Zionists to kill US citizens and blame those deaths on others. And we know the Zionists have killed 10s or 100s or 1000s of thousands of people and got away with it because the US state covers for them.

We also know the US assassinates people and kills 100s of thousands of civilians and call it “collateral damage” and they get away with it. So, there is absolutely no issue in believing the US state either itself or allowed the Zionists to kill 20,000 US citizens as “collateral damage”. The Epstein elite are paedophiles, murderers, fraudsters, they steal the wealth of the US and inject people with drugs they know are killing them. Another 20,000 deaths is not that many more to those who have already taken so many lives through so many wars.