The US has attacked any country that decided to stop using the dollar for international trade. The Chinese and Russians have been supporting the global warming crap as a way of attacking the west. USaid was pouring funds into extremist regimes and as a way to attack Russia and China and the US have been at war with something like 100 countries since WWII.

The US supports Israel which is deliberately murdering children and committing genocide and ethnic cleansing and that is all supported by Trump. The US is attacking Cuba … for not bowing and scraping to the US. Russia supports countries attacked by Israel and many freedom fighters against corrupt regimes kept in power by US corpse money.

Of course global warming is part of the attack on the west, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t justified.

The result of destroying western production now means that China and Russia can totally outproduce the armament that is needed to fight a long sustained war, which is what will happen if/when the US goes to war with Russia and China. The US will now lose such a war, unless it turns to nuclear, and it still may lose. (The “UK” nuclear weapons are controlled by the US and the UK politicians are under the control of US/CIA social media psychologists … so “UK” weapons are de facto US weapons)

That means Russia and China can now ditch the dollar and are free to trade in whatever currencies they choose. Which means they are no longer forced to take worthless dollars and support the US economy. Which will see the long term decline of the US. Which is why the US has always attacked any country such as Libya that decided to stop using the dollar.

Ukraine

Ukraine is falsely portrayed in the western media as an “unprovoked attack by Russia”. Ukraine is falsely portrayed by the Russia media as a “unwanted and provoked necessary military operation”. Both are false.

The west provoked Russia to war in Ukraine. However, Russia saw an opportunity through war in Ukraine to undermine and ultimately defeat the west.

The west’s idea was to trigger regime change in Russia, something it thought very likely because the Russians had been feeding western “intelligence” with baloney for years. “Russia on its knees, only pretending to have an army” … was the constant meme. The west thought a disastrous war in Ukraine would topple Putin and lead to the break up of the Russian Federation allowing the US corpse to suck the Russian assets dry.

In contrast, Russia had a problem. For Brics to succeed, it needed to stop doing so much business with the west and to turn Russia toward the east. But, how could it do that without provoking those powerful people with commercial interests with the west from attacking Putin? The simple answer: Get the west to stop trading with Russia. Putin needed western sanctions.

Likewise, the theft of Russian assets was intended by Russia, and was needed to undermine confidence in the western banking system. Just as the Brics banking system was taking off.

And, a strategic victory by Russia against the combined military “competence” of the west was another signal to the world, that the west military power was in the wane. And, so, the US threat of war if any country stopped using the dollar lost its power.

The Role of Global Warming

But, before Ukraine, western manufacturing had to be destroyed so the west (i.e. “Nato”) would suffer a humiliating military defeat. And, whilst global warming was the final attack, the attacks started when USSR controlled unions destroyed the coal and manufacturing industries. ALL SUPPORTED BY THATCHER.

Ukraine is just part of a multi-decadal long struggle one that was prepared by attacking western energy infrastructure and through that western manufacturing … which meant the western ability to produce the armaments for war with Russia/China.

But … why then, was Thatcher working for the Russians?

She’s dead, so we can’t ask her now why she worked for the Russians, but my bet is she genuinely believed she was doing the right thing based on what her advisers were saying. So, in some way the USSR had got to her advisors, and the most likely avenue for that, is that they got to the academics of Oxbridge that were treated like gods by the gullible British politicians of that era.

So, the global warming fraud, is just another note in the tune of the long term attack on the west which has been long term attacking Russia.

At this point it looks like Russia and China are winning, mostly because western “intelligence” is utterly incompetent and corrupt. Which no doubt had some Russia/Chinese support to achieve.

Where do I sit?

Whose side am I on? I’m not quite sure. Certainly not those colluding in genocide of the people of Jesus the Palestinian. I would like to say I prefer a world run by the British and 200 years ago that was undoubtedly true, because Britain was a shining light for morality compared to every other alternative.

I certainly am not on the side of the US which is the (second) most immoral regime as it’s colluding with Israel to murder children to clear the land shows. I don’t like Chinese totalitarianism. I despise Stammer’s paedophile loving regime. I suppose, in the same way as the British were the best of the bunch 200 years ago, I am not left with much choice  after all the others have been discarded and stamped on, but it is not a choice I want.

I am on the side of the common man … but only in their own country … and not one stolen from others.