For reasons which are fairly obvious, I’ve finally managed to get myself banned from the Guardian for speaking the truth about the evils of Climate extremism. Clearly the Guardian “doesn’t like it up em” and their hypocrisy of free speech is all the more galling because all I was doing was keeping on reminding them about the 18 years pause.
But banning me is a completely futile gesture, because we sceptics are now so many in number that within an hour of publishing an article on the failure of the Dead parrot Talks in Paris, the comments were being flooded by gleeful sceptics, delighted at the news – so much so that they closed comments entirely. So much for free speech!
But what is more sickening than climate extremists like Hollande using the deaths of illegal immigrants to push their sicking politics – good riddance!
I’ve copy and pasted the comments, because the Guardian will more than likely “magic” them away.
-
Why should we be surprised if the talks fail? Every other talk has failed too – the ‘big wigs’ have seen to it.
-
—————
Of course they don’t want an agreement .
With the $1.756 Billion in expenditure by the 63,384 attendees ,on caviar,champagne and ladies of the night ,they just want what always goes on .
What goes on?
No agreement until the last day and then the only decisions that are made,
1) let’s stay here for a couple of more weeks.
2) let’s all meet again in Monaco.
And the scam goes on.
Hell,where did this 2 deg thing come from.
“we will all perish”
Hell I love saunas and steam rooms,and look at what it has done for me.
So let’s all sing together .
“I love Paris in. The Winter”
-
-
0 1I usually strongly disagree with the riding the gravy train comments. Howrver, it now seems our entire political systems are so affected by lobbying and political whims, you may have something.
Obscenely rich companies and people feeding afluent people lotus fruits as they walk over the edge.
If a meaningful deal is not reached, populations should reply with extreme civil disorder. I really can’t see another way anymore…
-
-
-
-
0 1Of course they will fail, nothing of any substance has come out of any talks so far, all that will happen is the can will get kicked a bit further down the road. Our GOVT seem hell bent on scuppering wind and PV power, we’ve hardly made a dent in our CO2 emissions, and now we are going to start drilling in the arctic. Lets face it most people who matter don’t give a monkeys for the environment. In 50 years time some will look back and wonder if we were insane.
Desp -
-
1 2
Paris climate talks could fail, warns Francois Hollande
With France and the French government hosting and Hollande attempting to take the reins, that is even more likely than it would otherwise be.
-
-
1 2Well, of course they will fail.
If anyone really believed that the world was coming to an end they’d have done something about it before now. But they don’t.
They think the risks are as stated by the IPCC and so far less than the risks of poverty now.
So the talks will fail in the eyes of those who fear the Apocalypse. But lots of deals will be done.
China will get to sit down with African nations and do trade deals. Maybe even with South American nations and break Monroe.
The USA will agree a market for its Arctic Oil.
Russia and Iran will argue for increased oil prices.
India will argue for funding for its infrastructure and a western bank or two will help.
They will be very useful talks.
But they won’t be Green. Same as the last round. And the round before that. and so on. -
-
-
0 1Except it’s not immediately apparent how or where it’s running amok yet in any way that cannot be explained by normal weather variability leading to individual extreme weather events as indeed it always has. Arguably the Arctic sea ice melt represents an ongoing and more rapid than expected climate change (as opposed to weather) effect, but research suggests even that is not unprecedented. Between 6,000 and 10,000 ybp, the arctic may have been entirely free of sea ice in the summer over extended periods.
-
-
For once he’s quite correct. And the primary problem resides with some, note –only some, nations in the developing world who see this as just another opportunity to apply faux-moral pressure to the West, and above all, the USA.
If these states do not show greater flexibility, perhaps the best solution would be to remove this issue entirely from the purview of the UN, have the G20 powers formulate a deal amongst ourselves, and simply implement it multilaterally without consultation with the rest.
