The cold reality of "Global warming".

Posted on 20 July 2015 by Scottish-Sceptic

There’s no doubt the alarmists are getting desperate, resorting to increasingly desperate measures and now you really have to be extremely gullible to believe the nutters in the climate establishment.
One obvious one, is that Google have removed all sceptic blogs from their news feeds. As a result a blog that even  I don’t bother reading and barely anyone at all has heard of will be presented to the reader by Google in stead of the world’s most read climate site at WUWT. They will show a blog with perhaps 1/1000 the readership of WUWT instead of WUWT! That doesn’t happen by accident. Someone in Google has intentionally stopped sceptic sites from being displayed.
Another is the increasingly shrill newspaper articles. There’s no new evidence to support alarmism, quite the reverse! So, all they can do is regurgitate the same tired stories which people stopped reading years ago – and give them a new edge by making them sound even worse. Or they can launch an ever more vitriolic attack against the majority of people who are now sceptical – but all it does is reveal them as the nutters they are!
Another thing they try to do is tamper with the temperature datasets to for example “prove” there is no “pause”. That is frankly ridiculous! The pause is the discrepancy between what was predicted and what occurred. And because it is a prediction it can only be based on the datasets available at the time. They can fabricate whatever new datasets they like which they in their crazy minds believe “prove” the predicted warming occurred, but the predictions were that the datasets available at the time would show warming. None of the datasets which were predicted to warm have shown even the lowest predicted warming (e.g. IPCC 2001).
But doesn’t this mentality of changing the datasets to “prove” their bogus claims some up the real philosophy of their “science”? In real science, you assert a prediction and then test that prediction by comparing it to the measurement you predicted. In climate “science” you make a general vague assertion that “it will warm” and then if someone dares to show that the prediction was wrong, they “prove” their assertion by cherry picking data until they can fabricate a dataset with “shows” the “predicted”  warming. In other words you change the measurement to “prove” the assertion.
The gullibles
The big question now, is not whether the shrewd scientifically literate people of the world realise that global warming is a joke, but whether the evidence that the world is being lied to by the climate nutters is now so obvious that even the most gullible people with no science qualifications know it.
I can answer that quite simply: I arrived back from holiday on the west coast of Scotland. It is now well through July and there is still snow on many of the hills. I got back and lit the fire because the house was cold. We took wet suits to go into the sea, but the water was so cold just paddling that none of the children were tempted to go in.
After over two decades of alarmist drivel and constant claims the world is getting warmer, we in Scotland don’t need sophisticated thermometers to know that it isn’t true. Sane sensible people don’t need sophisticated instruments to know there is no global warming here – despite the claims “children won’t know what so is”, children in Scotland not only see snow in winter, but even in summer!
The discrepancy between the predictions and reality are now so huge that anyone with two eyes in their head can see their predictions have failed.
The nutters pushing global warming alarmism can fabricate whatever “data” they want to, but despite Google’s Nazi-style repression of free speech, despite adjusting the temperature data, fabricating papers, lying to the public about how much worse it is all getting –  it just doesn’t wash any longer.

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The cold reality of "Global warming".

  1. wolsten says:
    20 July 2015 at 08:54

    Given Bill Gates has a more realistic attitude to renewable energy (at least) should we all be switching to Bing?!

  2. oldbrew says:
    20 July 2015 at 09:13

    wolsten: correct – test it by running the same search on both.
    Search algorithms can be and are adjusted to promote or demote certain websites, or categories of websites, as desired by the search engine bosses.

  3. johnfuller108 says:
    20 July 2015 at 10:40

    I would urge everyone to watch this video of a panel of retired scientists/USAF professionals etc discussing the nano particulates which have been issuing from most jets for some years.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daGuPLXVunQ
    The programme was sold to the public [which was apparently voted in by the public at 78%!] as a shield around the earth with the purpose of reflecting the sun’s rays and protecting the earth.
    I heard Obama saying this was an urgent need and required action. [Did you read about it a few years back?]
    Although there are other advantages [for some] of the programme [eg weather modification], it could be that the pause is influenced by this, and should be looked into.
    I assume the wall of secrecy around the programme is because there will be unpopular issues arising – especially the effects of nano particulate aluminium on life forms. Perhaps that could answer why the programme is not being sited in explanation of the pause.

  5. Nick de Cusa says:
    20 July 2015 at 16:37

    What source confirm this info about Google?

  6. Homer Simpson says:
    20 July 2015 at 19:22

    Duh !
    Well it seems like as though you must be an actual “news organisation” to be included in the “News” section, and yet WUWT search in the “Web” section still turns up pages of results, as does Google e-mail notifications for “WUWT”. Better still use the explicit search string, “Watts Up With That”, to avoid sarcastic-clones like the pathetic “Wotts Up With That”, and similar.
    If you really wanted the latest news from WUWT pages, then you ought to be using RSS feed direct from WUWT, and not scrabbling about at Google “News” search, for such things. Bing is no better than Google in this respect.
    XML Feeds (Use RSS Reader or browser plugin)
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/rss/ or http://wattsupwiththat.com/feed/
    latest comments at WUWT from this feed URL :
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/comments/feed/

  7. Homer Simpson says:
    20 July 2015 at 19:30

    Or maybe try a specific “site search” for “Last 24 Hours”
    https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&gws_rd=cr&fg=1#tbs=qdr:d&q=site:wattsupwiththat.com
    or how about the past weeks stories sorted by date at WUWT ?
    https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&gws_rd=cr&fg=1#q=site:wattsupwiththat.com&tbs=sbd:1,qdr:w
    Before starting with the conspiracy theories,
    try following the Google Search Instructions
    and “Help” pages, where this is explained.

  8. Jim Steele says:
    21 July 2015 at 03:32

    I have experienced that skewed presentation by Google. I can have an essay presented at WUWT with over 100 replies, and post it on my own website at landscapesandcycles.net but if you google the title of the essay, the website of some lunatic skeptic bashers who gets only one reply gets presented at the top of the search results ahead of the original article.
    I also remember when google altered the search results for keyword “climate gate”. When I first typed the word “climate” the top “suggested link” woould be climategate . But as the issue gained even more notoriety, suddenly any links to climategate were not even suggested.

  9. Nick de Cusa says:
    21 July 2015 at 05:39

    In fact -for whatever reason- it’s true that WUWT is excluded from gnews: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=site%3Awattsupwiththat.com&oq=site%3Awattsupwiththat.com&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.2152.9290.0.9667.24.6.0.18.0.0.221.1090.0j4j2.6.0…0.0…1ac.1.91UugnG23rM#hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbm=nws&q=site:realclimate.com
    The interest of gnews is that persons who don’t know the site may find it. This Google decision does make it a lot more difficult for new readers to come across WUWT.

  10. Nick de Cusa says:
    21 July 2015 at 05:41

    Error: I meant to post this link: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=site%3Awattsupwiththat.com&oq=site%3Awattsupwiththat.com&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.2152.9290.0.9667.24.6.0.18.0.0.221.1090.0j4j2.6.0…0.0…1ac.1.91UugnG23rM

  11. David Graham says:
    21 July 2015 at 07:29

    Just in case you missed this on the news (ho ho doesn’t fit agenda) from down under
    June 2015
    Melbourne’s start to winter has been its coldest in more than 65 years.
    It also was the coldest start to winter for the western Melbourne suburb Laverton since record taking began in 1944.
    Melbourne Airport recorded a maximum of 11.1 degrees for the day, equaling the lowest temperature for June 1
    July 2015
    Only the third time in 20 years that there’s been two consecutive mornings under 2 degrees.
    Melbourne is on track for its coldest July in 20 years.
    Sunday morning was the coldest July morning since 1994
    Sunday was coldest in Ballarat, with the temperature dropping to minus 4.9 degrees. “Ballarat reached the same temperature as Mount Buller and Mount Hotham,”
    Essendon Airport, temperatures dropped to minus 1.5
    Don’t stress my man made warmist friends it will still be the hottest year evah our meteorology records will be homogenised to ensure that.
    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/melbourne-weather-winter-start-breaks-coldest-june-day-record-20150602-ghel90.html#ixzz3gQLHXeId
    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/melbourne-weather-city-on-track-for-coldest-july-in-20-years-20150720-gifxwt.html#ixzz3gQNPAHcN
    http://www.standard.net.au/story/3220329/melbourne-weather-city-shivers-through-coldest-morning-in-18-years/?cs=7

  12. Scottish-Sceptic says:
    21 July 2015 at 07:47

    I can’t say it’s all bad. The grass has hardly grown this year, so no need to waste hours pushing a lawn-mower – I assume because of the cold and lack of sun.

Comments are closed.