| Field summary for Q10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Which of the following engineering areas have you worked in for at least a year? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Computer programmer, information technologist, etc. (1) | 1344 | 49.21% | |
| Design (2) | 921 | 33.72% | |
| Light (electronics, instrumentation) (3) | 734 | 26.88% | |
| Heavy (industrial) (4) | 464 | 16.99% | |
| Manufacturing (5) | 741 | 27.13% | |
| Teaching (6) | 260 | 9.52% | |
| Power (7) | 397 | 14.54% | |
| Civil & construction. (8) | 415 | 15.20% | |
| Other | 461 | 16.88% | |
 |
|||
Computer Tech is vital but without the scientist / engineer/ a programmer without education in their fields is lost , therefore not worth paying in washers ?
You’ll notice that sceptics are predominantly from areas where they’ve had a good science education and then they go into areas with “hands-on” experience where they have to apply that science.
That’s where they learn the old saying “it might work in theory but does it work in practice”. Bitter experience teaches that it does not. A lesson that the climate academic who thought they were omnipotent are learning (like any wet-behind the ears science graduate)