Thinking about the priorities in Climate this morning, the very first was not only to enforce the subpoena against NOAA compelling them to release the emails that no doubt show the Whitehouse forcing them to change the way global temperature was compiled, but to bring criminal charges against them for not immediately complying with it (they were led to believe that they’d never be charged on the assumption that a Democrat would never enforce the law).
Someone needs to go to jail for blocking that investigation!
That will then open the investigation up, but like all investigations it will take time and five years is hardly enough to go through the process of investigating why we got into the mess we are in on climate, working out what needs doing and finally implementing the solutions.
That is why I’d like to see Trump order the FBI (or however it is done) to begin criminal investigations against NOAA and their blank refusal to comply with the lawful subpoena as soon as his feet hit the whitehouse carpet. Because we can’t wait the time to individually investigate everyone in such a massive fraud.
So, what we really need to see, is someone in NOAA being led away with handcuffs within days of Trump getting in. That would send a very clear message to all the fraudsters and con artists in climate that they will not get away with their crimes. That will cause them to want to find a compromise.
Indeed, given how much fraud goes on in academia – we also need to see some prominent academics likewise in handcuffs. This will be the biggest shock imaginable: the idea that they are criminally liable for fraudulent behaviour will be a huge shock to most academics.
For most academics, seeing one of their number being led away in handcuffs simply for making up data will be such a sobering thought ….
Trump is coming
Trump only needs to pick off around a half dozen key people and very quickly the rest of those involved will get the message. This will immediately raise standards – the thought of having to justify how they obtained the “convenient” data in court will cause most researchers to spend a little more time to obtain actual data (or just as importantly, admit they don’t have the data).
However, what we really need to do, is to remove from the literature, all the rubbish that has been printed in the name of climate alarmism in the last two decades.
Climate Truth and Reconciliation
For that, I think we’re going to need something akin to a “truth and reconciliation committee”. In other words, we need to create an atmosphere that both permits academics to admit where they have made up data, but also in the sure knowledge, that if they do not, they likely face jail.
