#ringberg15 The real science

I had a search today to find out whether those involved in Ringberg had finally come to their senses. Reading Climate Etc and some other blogs I was reminded of this scenario:
Wile is running and suddenly finds himself to have run over a cliff. But in the cartoons he still keeps running as if the ground were still there. That’s where we are with climate sensitivity. The ground is the “2C” limit and they still present the same rubbish they always have as if that “2C” limit were written in stone, except the pause shows that all their knowledge encapsulated in those climate models is wrong. They know nothing – but still they keep pumping out the same rubbish … the legs keep going ….
But whether or not Wile believes it or not, sooner or later physical laws dictate what happens next.
Mother earth aka “God” is a climate sceptic. And mother nature dictates what happens next, not a bunch of useless academics with their failed theories at Ringberg.
This is what sorts out engineer-scientists from academic-scientists. We both use the same physical laws of the universe, the difference is that engineers know that they have to be right because if a bridge falls down, we get sued. In contrast academic-scientists like those at Ringberg are purely academic and if their predictions fail – what happens? They have another all expenses paid by the public purse conference like Ringberg to all get around and discuss why they aren’t complete failures and present such wonderful results as this:
The only actual evidence that one presenter gave after which he said “I’m very very very very very very very confident climate sensitivity is over 2C” (I added a few extra very’s for humour – but it was hilarious even without them).