We've won

4 Responses to We've won

1. stefanthedenier says:

   18 September 2012 at 02:05

   G’day Scotty, long time no see. I thought you are gone hibernating, with a truckload of corn nectar – to drown your sorrow. Glad to see now, you have being active.
   Scotty, people that ”pretended” to believe the ”tree-ring-theory” are to blame. When first time I heard about it; I said: -”agronomist and lumberjacks know that many factors influence the thickens of the ring – the tree ”tree-ring”- theorist should shove that theory up their own rings!!! Unfortunately, big city folks like to be told lies.
   2] in ”Hubert Lamb Building / East Anglia uni” – ”the British Building of Shame” where they were concocting their conspiracy – they had to do it. Because prof Hubert Lamb in 70’s up to early 80’s, was promoting ”Nuclear Winter for year 2000 – because of CO2 ”DIMMING effect”
   The countdown for year 2000 was approaching – they found best backdoor exit, in opposite direction; with bigger noise; promoting GLOBAL warming – before you even defrosted from their nuclear winter. Both theories are exactly the same. Urban Sheep is getting fleeced, nothing unusual. Before the 80’s, there were few freelance ”climatologist” – now climatology, ecology, marine biology and other fuckoloist professions are cannibalizing the essential professions as engineering, medicine, agronomist; in the western universities.. When is less in ”producing professions” and more in the ”wasting professions”… when are two shearers for every sheep -> shearers have to eat the sheep, to survive. just common sense
   After the ”tree-ring-theory” lots of other crap was invented -> more and more ”Bullshine Addicts” were created, on both sides of the sandpit – they hate, when the truth is presented. If you start telling real proofs -> both camps will gang-up against you. Western universities became laundromats for brainwashing – students have being educated that; climate will stop changing with carbon tax.- if it doesn’t stop changing -> blame the skeptics for not paying enough Those students will become academics, police officers, solicitors – some solicitors will become judges – if then you try to clear the smokescreen – GULAG, or stoning in public. Scotty, get some things done, before those students graduate. For example: I would like; you personally ”to peer review” those two posts, so you can have more RELIABLE fire-power: http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/global-temperature/
   http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/water-vapor/
   And, as optional, if you like to know: why the ”Skeptics” are born losers; even though they are on the correct side::: http://globalwarmingdenier.wordpress.com/2012/08/25/skeptics-stinky-skeletons-from-their-closet/ SCOTTY, NEVER GIVE UP!!! Stay in touch. (looks like my name has being blacklisted on your blog) – that’s how the reds control / manipulate / silence / oppress – by extreme political correctness) Scotty, don’t fall for their trick. I have chosen that name – to show them that; their tricks don’t work on me. I had to grow up east of the Iron Curtain, I know how they operate / exploit ”extreme political correctness” don’t underestimate them. If you don’t dance under their tune = they will become impotent and cannot screw up the western democracies. Skeptics, falling for the Warmist extreme correctness, is Viagra for the Warmist
2. Scottish Sceptic says:

   18 September 2012 at 22:33

   Stefan, not given up by any means – just so busy on scef.org.uk that I don’t have time here any longer.
   I was just having a “Eureka moment” and wanted to shout it somewhere – I’ve now added you to the “global sceptic conspiracy” email list, so hopefully you will hear about it in the next few days.
3. barn E. rubble says:

   1 December 2012 at 05:19

   Just wondering if this site is still alive? Any updates on things legal?
4. Scottish Sceptic says:

   1 December 2012 at 09:53

   Barn,
   I’ve been spending my time at scef.org.uk. That campaign is probably coming to a natural end now that most (ground roots) UK climate researchers are about as sceptical as we are about their models and now that worldwide governments have rejected the alarmism. So the aims will largely have been achieved when the Kyoto Commitment comes to an end on the 31st December 2012.
   Beyond that date, we are really in the realm of inevitability. The scam is coming to an end, and already people with far more resources than I are jumping on the bandwagon, and when Kyoto is ditched that trickle will turn into a flood and … well there will be better things to do than join in with the crowd.
   On legal action, I’ve no doubt we can win legal action, if:
   1. We could get the money.
   2. We could get sceptics to work together rather than going off and doing their own thing.
   And of the two, the most difficult is the second and if you think about it it will be obvious. The kind of people who became sceptics are those who don’t go along with what everyone else is saying and have the gumption (pig-headedness?) to go and check the facts if they personally don’t feel they are right.
   E.g. the BBC know that if we had the money we would win a defamation case against them. I know it, they know it. And I know that they know that we won’t get the money to take the case unless they are stupid enough to antagonise enough sceptics to spur us into action.

Comments are closed.