Sceptics have won – no comment at the Guardian

Posted on 20 February 2012 by Scottish-Sceptic

Obviously we all know the Guardian reports blatant lies** so it is not surprising that when all other papers have cut down on their non-science over global warming, the Guardian like some tantrum toddler continues to rant and scream.
So, having been banned from the Guardian for saying that the UEA broke the law (just like that), when I felt like a bit of fun pointing out to eco-zealots the lie about BIG-OIL, the continuous diarrhoea from the Guardian was …. irresistible? …. no! The last resort, because there’s almost no warmists left posting anywhere except the Guardian (and a few US backwaters).
But, what did I find when I looked through all their recent global warming non-science?
NO COMMENT!
Clearly, even the Guardian comments, where the most blatant double standards applied (anyone could delete anything sceptic … but no one could delete anything pro … and it was filled with lurking trolls who worked as teams to provoke the sceptic into getting banned) even the Guardian is now so filled with sceptics that they’ve had to ban comment or risk having their junk journalism continuously shown up for its hypocrisy and economy of truth.
**In faked documents.

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Sceptics have won – no comment at the Guardian

  1. Rob says:
    20 February 2012 at 14:35

    The editorial staff at the Guardian are a bit like the captain on the costa cruise liner, they think they are in higher seas than they actually are. In the end the Guardian will just keel over. Not to worry though Captain Moonbat will be to the rescue, all from dry land off course.

  2. Jack Savage says:
    20 February 2012 at 16:25

    Whilst not universally the case, by and large I have to agree with you. The Guardian is more and more cautious about enabling comments on some of its more, shall we say, contentious “catastrophic global warming” articles.
    They do not seem to realise that the best method of deflecting hostile commentary is to publish less blatantly biased and more truthful pieces in the first place.
    This self-evident truth has yet to sink in, however.
    In certainly remains the case that anyone posting comments which cast doubt on CAGW needs to be very very careful with their language if they do not want their comment to disappear pronto.
    However, you can pretty much say what you like about a “denier”!
    Their gaff, their (unwritten) rules.
    However, when I am feeling strong, I plug on regardless….

  3. Shooter says:
    27 February 2012 at 22:43

    Don’t forget the Guardian is pro-feminist as well, so they have a degree in professional bullshitting.

Comments are closed.