A good day II

The advantage I have over academia, is that I have no allegiance to the “consensus” on human evolution. So, although nothing I’m including is ultimately very revolutionary – indeed nothing like “the naked ape”, the fact that I have been able to start afresh with no allegiance to what has gone before, has allowed me to shape a very different pathway.

I would liken it to a pathway … where the changes at most intersections are much the same, all quite reasonable science, but the accumulated sum of those small changes is to take a very different path. That is only possible, because there are no small voices whispering in my ear from my (academic) “colleagues” constantly telling me to “make it more acceptable” and to ensure that it supports the current status quo.

To take another example, the genetic changes between a human and a chimp are relatively small, but the overall change in body shape is significant, and the overall change in lifestyle that results is massive. Small changes do matter, but most of all they matter if the accumulation is to divert from the status quo, whereas woke academia has a culture of consensus status quo.

So, I can be pretty sure there is no one biting at my heals and following me on this path, at least from within academia, and almost certainly not from the US.

It is also becoming clear, that I am part of the last few generations who will be able to think for themselves. We are a dying breed, innovation is dying because academia and US social media is teaching sterile consensus … one which will inevitably lead to the demise of those countries subject to this cognitive sterility.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.