I saw a tweet from Gavi schmidt
Will Happer discusses how to hide funding for his testimony and writing. #contrariansforhire https://t.co/WNaygPcXLW
— Gavin Schmidt (@ClimateOfGavin) December 8, 2015
And then discovering this scandal (reported by Greenpeace as sceptics getting fossil money) involved a sceptic working as a “labor of love” without pay.
The next bit of the scandal was when I read Climate Depot
Greenpeace co-founder reports it to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes
Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: ‘I was suspicious about the [Greenpeace] e-mail exchange from the start, so I wrote every response assuming that it might be public some day. But what I wrote expressed exactly what I believed to be true.’
Greenpeace co-founder reports it to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes
Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: ‘I was suspicious about the [Greenpeace] e-mail exchange from the start, so I wrote every response assuming that it might be public some day. But what I wrote expressed exactly what I believed to be true.’Greenpeace founder reports it to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes
‘Greenpeace has made itself the sworn enemy of all life on Earth’
By Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace
Greenpeace, in furtherance of what is in effect its war against every species on the planet, has now turned to what, on the face of things, looks to me like outright breach of the RICO, wire-fraud, witness-tampering and obstruction-of-committee statutes. I have called in the FBI.
Greenpeace appears to have subjected Dr Will Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University, to a maladroit attempt at entrapment that has badly backfired on it.
Which looks like heating up into a nice scandal with Greenpeace investigation instigated by its own founder.
That seemed good enough, but then I read this tweet from Paul Thacker:
Wait. I thought it was wrong to disclose scientists’ emails….. https://t.co/V16fO4Uqti — Paul Thacker (@thackerpd) December 8, 2015
Now, Mr Schmidt has been very vocal in his condemnation of the proper investigation by the duly appointed oversight body asking for emails belonging to the public of a body under its jurisdiction claiming: “they are scientists – so their emails cannot be seen”.
But … look at his response as soon as sceptic emails are libellously and criminally obtained … he splashes the link over the internet with the greatest of glee.
Somehow I think NOAA are now a lot closer to releasing their emails!
