A sudden realisation – I wouldn't want to be a climate academic now.

Posted on 20 June 2015 by Scottish-Sceptic

I was just reading the climate depot article “Aussies get traction on the issue of ‘temperature data homogenization’ and thinking that yes, there is growing coverage of data tampering in the media and it is almost becoming widely accepted that the “academics” have been tampering the temperature record, when I suddenly realised I had the answer to the question in my last article:
“What happens to the pope [when real world data proves him wrong]”, because they can’t sack a pope.
And the answer is simple: the catholic church as one body will unite and turn against those who caused him & the whole catholic church to be misled. The pope will not be to blame but those academics advising him. And I doubt they will distinguish between the honest and the deceptive, between those who have set high standards and those with no standards.

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A sudden realisation – I wouldn't want to be a climate academic now.

  1. johnfuller108 says:
    20 June 2015 at 09:00

    SS:I believe you wrote a summary of Prof Salby’s lecture? I listened to one recorded from London this year, and couldn’t really follow it … apart from the main just.
    Do you have a link to your synopsis, please? Thanks
    John

  2. johnfuller108 says:
    20 June 2015 at 12:42

    I found it, SS [http://bit.ly/1IqjGjC].
    I did notice something, though, about your 5 points on ‘the real science’ [17 Jun].
    You pointed out that in a worst case scenario, the CO2 would perhaps double [causing no more that 1.2C of warming].
    But one of the things I took from listening to Prof Salby’s lecture this year in London was that within a decade a feedback loop neutralises the effect, and returns the system to equilibrium.
    His findings would be a serious case against CC hysteria, and that must be why he had his research papers confiscated. Without those he cannot be quoted with any power.

  3. johnfuller108 says:
    20 June 2015 at 12:49

    [As you’ve probably realised, I’m no scientist. I think the term ‘feedback loop’ in my last post was inaccurate.]

  4. omanuel says:
    20 June 2015 at 21:30

    Some members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, like Stephen Hawkins, have played prominent roles in promoting false “consensus science” outside the Vatican.
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

Comments are closed.