Scanning the dying news stories I spotted a lot of the “pause denial” stories based on NOAA altered data & analysis and I began wondering why it didn’t concern me in the slightest that they had all these news-stories.
Why wasn’t I concerned that they “got rid of the pause”?
And then it struck me. For years the zealots like NOAA have been saying “the data cannot be interpreted in any other way – the world is warming”. Then when we sceptics said “but recently the world is not warming”. They initially denied it, then admitted it – and then started to come up with all types of excuses.
At that point, they had a tenable argument. The world was warming as predicted, the data was correct, but something they had not previously considered was causing a temporary pause.
So, the temperature data is secure, the analysis of the trend is secure – there was just something else that they had not considered.
THEN – like complete idiots …
NOAA came out and said: “actually the data is not secure, the analysis was not correct”. In short, they’ve just proved what we sceptics have been saying all along –
you can get whatever trend you want by manipulating the data
And they are seriously trying to use this trick against the people who above any other know how to manipulate data to get whatever trend they desire: POLITICIANS. They have spotted this a mile off. These academics have blown their credibility with a cheap trick that every politician understands.
And add to that they’ve thrown a huge custard pie at every academic who’s been on TV saying “yes I agree that we’ve seen a temporary pause but I think it’s explainable by … <enter another excuse>”.
And sure as eggs are eggs, like every other previous excuse for the pause, this one will be quietly forgotten – firstly because they’ve basically said every other group compiling temperature data showing a pause has LIED and secondly, because there is now an industry in creating papers explaining the pause and too many academics are now on that bandwagon for them all to jump off with any credibility left.
see theeuroprobe.org 2012 – 15 The Great Global Warming Fraud
Seems the G7 lot are starting to catch on too.
From Slate:
In a joint declaration from the G7 summit, leaders of the world’s richest countries called for a global phase-out of fossil fuels for the first time on Monday. That sounds great, but unfortunately, they’re talking about a lax timescale—“over the course of this century.”
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/g7-to-save-the-world-but-not-yet/
So not a lot of urgency there!
The one thing I learnt when I was a member of the Green party in Scotland is that almost none of them have any idea about basic things like power usage. For example I was talking to one about the way every Scottish hill would need a windmill. After they failed to grasp the enormity of what I was saying I eventually inquired what she understood by a “windmill” and it turned out she had this vision of a 1m span windmill she had seen at a “alternative technology” park.
So, the solution to this problem is easy – we put up one enormous windmill – with a huge electric motor to keep it turning all the time – and tell the greens that is where all our power comes from. I doubt more than 1 in a hundred would even question that assertion.
never ceases to amaze
‘the science is settled’
‘the data is clear, there is no pause’
‘BTW … here is our new research, that shows (after we reconfigured the heretofore indisputable data) … the pause disappears’
‘NOW the science is settled’
we live in strange times
these people actually make it through the educational system and are given PhDs?
so they might not be COMPLETE idiots
darn close though
Now I’m given to understand that an article in the Guardian claims that climate change may cause the end of beer
first snow and now beer
a couple more of these and I’m gonna begin to suspect that I am in a coma and this is all an hallucination
Thanks Mike – it’d be useful to me to learn these so I can answer aggressive questions. I was disappointed that they didn’t mention sun
cycles though.
Pingback: NOAA Idea of the Political Climate | contrary2belief