I have been bowled over by the response to the survey. For example, I noticed a survey ID “501” had come in. By the time I get around to posting this it had risen:
| Total responses: | 538 |
|---|---|
| Full responses: | 379 |
| Incomplete responses: | 159 |
Unfortunately, I can’t go into much detail about what I was expecting from the survey as that may bias the results.
But I can say the support is fantastic!
However, there was a slight glitch around 10-11am this morning (UK time). Ironically, this is when I ran a backup “just in case we lost answers”.
Lewandowsky, who infamously polled alarmist sites to find out what skeptics thought (!), was awarded a Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award. Your prizes and kudos will be better earned.
Hi Mike,
I’m confused by question one:
“How often do you read “sceptic” blogs which are generally sceptical of manmade warming such as Watts Up With That, Climate Depot, Harmless Sky, The GWPF, Jo Nova, Climate Audit, Stephen Goddard, Bishop Hill, Tallbloke’s Talkshop, EIKE, etc.”
My problem is that none of the sites listed are sceptics, they’re contrarian. Did you mean “septic”?
Now there’s someone who shares my sense of humour!
But to be frank, the biggest hassle I’ve had is what to call each side.