With the UK Right out the picture, the UK elections have come down to a fight between the Popular Reform party and the UN-Popularist globalist party led by someone who is the complete opposite of what any party would put forward as a leader. Someone who was responsible for the crown prosecution service when they did absolutely nothing to stop Saville or the Islamic grooming gangs. And, note: the only person who ever got prosecuted was the person who did most to call out those who allowed it all to happen: Tommy Robinson.

Only Farage can now stop Liebour, an appalling globalist party that (at least since Bliar) has never done anything for the poor or socially deprived in Britain … instead it just panders to the $oros/Globalist agenda that puts up fuels costs and destroys democracy, stability and generally makes life a lot worse, especially for the poor.

The stupidity of the campaign against Trump has left me wondering whether it’s intended to get Trump elected. As far as I’m concerned, he’s just another US president. Less corrupt than many, but just as gullible on issues like the Israeli genocide.

At one time I might have said “as leader of the free world etc.”, but that is no longer true. The US is no longer the leader of anything except political corruption. Would Trump sort it out, not if his first term is anything to go by. The corruption did not end with Trump, although the corrupt clearly disliked Trump intensely, but realistically, he did little to change anything.

Perhaps another term would be different. He would know what he was letting himself in for and he would have a better idea how to tackle the blatant corruption now seen in the New York “court” … which is giving any real courts left a very bad name, because it is just a joke.

The stupid thing, is the US is on the way out, with or without Trump. Indeed, if Russia has to go to war with the West, it would clearly want Bidem as “leader”.

But it now looks like a sure Trump victory. Does it matter if he wins that way? Not on his own merits, but because of the stupidity of those against him? I could think of better politicians to be president, but they don’t have a chance now.

Foreign Ministry statement (https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1948486/) on the Russian Armed Forces’ exercises held to practice for the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons

Regarding the upcoming Russian military exercises held to practice for the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons, we would like to point out that these drills should be viewed in the context of the recent militant statements made by Western officials and the highly destabilising actions taken by several NATO countries to increase military pressure on the Russian Federation <…>.

The matter concerns above all the open declaration of support for and the provision of direct assistance to the terrorist attacks against Russia carried out by the Kiev regime with the use of increasingly more advanced Western weapons provided to it. <…>

Apart from the British and French long-range missiles, which have long been used in Ukraine, we have taken special note of the models of US-made ATACMS missiles, which have been recently sent to Ukraine and are capable of reaching targets inside Russia.

At the same time, attempting to build up multifaceted missile threats to Russia, the US has openly and manifestly launched the deployment of ground-based intermediate- and shorter-range missiles, which were previously prohibited under the INF Treaty, around the world. <…>

We hereby expressly declare that we reserve the right to respond in kind, no matter where US-made intermediate- and shorter-range missiles are deployed, which would amount to the termination of Russia’s unilateral moratorium on the deployment of these weapon systems. <…>

These and several other actions by NATO countries actually show that they are deliberately trying to escalate the Ukrainian crisis all the way to an open military confrontation between NATO countries and Russia within the framework of their hostile policy of inflicting a “strategic defeat” on Russia.

There is a way to deal with Russia; But childish behaviour and empty threats from imbecilic politicians which Russia knows the west cannot back up, because of the insane policies like Nut Zero, won’t intimidate them.

If it came to WWIII, Russia knows that it is in a far better position than any of the west to recover afterwards. In contrast, it would be the end of the west. Russia has no long term interest in caving in to the empty and childish threats of the west, when it knows that either it would win or the west would be forced into a humiliating and catastrophic climb down.

I have discovered today that Raquel Welch is dead … I am in deep mourning. OK, I’m about a year too late, and she died at 82 with Alzheimer’s, so not a bad run, but I would still have loved to talk to her or any of the cast of the film about it.

On the positive side, I’ve discovered that there was a 1940 version of One Million Years BC starring Carole Landis in the same role as Raquel and Victor Mature as Tumak. His best known film roles include One Million B.C. (1940), My Darling Clementine (1946), Kiss of Death (1947), Samson and Delilah (1949), and The Robe (1953). He also appeared in many musicals opposite such stars as Rita Hayworth and Betty Grable.

For the female star Carole Landis the 1940 role was also her breakout role and she was then known as “The Ping Girl” and “The Chest” because of her curvy figure … which explains why Raquel got the part.

Bizarrely the two films, separated by 24 years of improvement in cinema technology show almost the same scenes with pet lizard portraying terrifying dinosaurs inhabiting the world with man. It’s as if the technology had stood still!

And today’s other news: the camper van party is in trouble.

I have been exploring the concept of human development by  “non-innovation”, in other words, the idea that everything evolved without any great thinkers or “eureka”  moments, and it has been extremely fruitful. Today I was looking at the development of farming … and I had a Eureka moment (which using the methodology I have, is not supposed to be part of human development).

The model says, that there is nothing special in this “eureka moment” even if it felt marvellous to me. Instead it was something that was going to happen inevitably and I just happen to be the person it happened to … and that was simply a result of the current state of human technological development. It was going to happen, whether I was around or not,  So, I am nothing special …. but it still felt good.

But aside from the paradox inherent in MY approach (and it is mine … so a Eureka idea … so very much a paradox in a theory that says “Eureka moments don’t matter” … and they do not “belong” to people … they are just an inevitable stage in development that was always going to happen.) ….

But aside from that paradox, I’m increasingly seeing that it is going to be very difficult to explain what I’ve done to academia. Academia is a stifling culture which praises and admires the  “Eurekas” … indeed it is very much a culture of the “inventor” and “expert” to whom it ascribes all great things. That is because it is a culture that praises the individual … especially the individuals in charge of academia.

They were never going to like my approach, even when it was obvious what I was doing, But now I find that I’m starting to develop quite sophisticated complex ideas of human development, which all rely on earlier work, non of it published. You cannot understand my latest ideas, without accepting and understanding the earlier …. non of it published,

Of course, publishing would improve the work through critique … and it will be far from perfect … but getting bogged down in long debates about detail would also destroy my ability and will to continue. The stifling culture of academia that “only changes one death at a time” is never going to accept anything so radical where even the approach is radical, but the result is a series of extremely radical proposals – all extremely controversial – so all draining my time to “argue my case” and therefore motivation to continue moving forward if I publish.

In current academia, even if you are an insider (not an outsider like me) to be accepted new ideas have to be pushed for the whole length of an academic career to finally be accepted. Because I am not so fettered, I’ve been able to do the work of half a dozen academic careers in a fraction of the time, albeit, the quality will never be as good as a thoroughly “traumatised” academic idea pushed for a lifetime against vicious critique.

Fortunately, I have no particular desire “to be accepted”, so I do not need any academic to agree with me. I just want to work it out … because the way we actually developed is absolutely fascinating. It’s like watching the very best thriller series, and never being disappointed. It’s like having my very own time machine … and I love it.

So, do I go back to start trying to explain … or continue the adventure into the unknown? Not a difficult choice.

In a new post on Twitter Tony Heller shows a graph that shows a marked increase in sea ice from a minimum around 2010. This suggests that the arctic sea ice will reach the maximum of the 1980s (a fraudulent start to the “trend”) in about 2040, or roughly a 60 year cycle putting us close to the half way point as we move from the more-open water to more-frozen phase.

Anyone that knows anything about the climate scam, knows that all the temperature data is and was cherry picked to show “warming”. That cannot be changed, but what will change is that the supposed icon of the global warming scam: melting Arctic ice, is now revealed to be a bogus trend totally at odds with the fraudulent temperature data. The two are increasingly incompatible and irreconcilable with each other.

It is now safe to say that global warming alarmism is in for a long period of decline.

For more than a year, I have been working out how to survive nuclear war and the result is that I am now quite convinced that the majority of people would easily survive … and that there are things we can do to help push us from the group that dies to the group that survives. Yes, large numbers will die in a nuclear war, that is a given, but that is very different from everyone will die. That is a lie.

But, having worked out that survival isn’t that difficult, I’ve hit a problem. As a sceptic, I need to check my work, and so I’ve tried to find people who I can discuss the subject with. But, despite finding so called “prepper”, “survival” or “bushcraft” sites, which you would imagine would be delighted to discuss how to survive a nuclear war, the opposite is the truth. Every discussion on surviving WWIII has either been shut down or targetted with doomsayers pushing the lie that death is inevitable.

Why would people do that? Why would sites claiming to be discussion forums for survival … implying a very positive attitude to surviving … repress discussion on how to survive nuclear war? It’s all been very odd and I’ve struggled to explain it!

There seems two most likely reasons:

1. People are trying to stop serious preparation for a nuclear war – because they don’t want “other people” (meaning people like me) to survive
2. People are trying to stop serious preparation for a nuclear war – because they think preparation will make a war more likely.

Either way, it appears that so called “prepper” sites, aren’t what they claim: they are run by people who don’t want anyone to actually prepare for a nuclear war. To put it simply, the forums claiming to be “prepper” sites are not to encourage preparation, they are intended to stop preparation! That is very easy to do: add a lot of stupid “conspiracy” posts about “the great reset” and that puts off most people who see the sites discussing deliberately created “conspiracy theories” and they think preparation looks idiotic … and if anyone (like me) attempts to have a serious discussion … that then gets repressed, censored or demoralised so that the discussion never goes any where.

At which point, I would like to say “well … it doesn’t actually matter” because a nuclear war is unlikely. However, one of these options (that they don’t want us to survive), seems to imply the existence of a doomsday cult which is actively pushing us toward nuclear war, in an attempt to kill the vast majority of humanity. If so, that would make a nuclear war very much more likely.

At which point I have to do a sense check: can I really believe that there are people who would push something that would kill millions. That sounds utterly crazy, but unfortunately, the truth is that there could be such people, because that is what Net Zero is. Net Zero is a doomsday cult attempting to destroy the entire modern fossil economy upon which billions of people rely to survive.

So, I cannot dismiss the doomsday cult on the basis that people would have to be insane to push it, because they have to be insane to push Net Zero. There are insane people around … so the argument that “you have to be insane to kill billions” … doesn’t mean there aren’t people trying to kill billions.

Why would a doomsday cult want to kill humanity? Because there are people who believe that humanity (meaning everyone else) is a “plague” on the planet destroying all the wildlife. And, it is true that much of the wilderness has been destroyed by human population growth. So, it is possible that there is a cult that thinks the planet cannot be “saved” until almost every single human (except themselves) is killed.

And, there are people who are openly talking of population reduction … a euphemism for mass murder. So, there are already people openly supporting the mass murder of huge numbers of people. It doesn’t take a lot to go from mass murder of large numbers, to mass murder of everyone (but themselves). It is not a scenario that can be easily rejected.

I need to think about this.

Upon reflection: The most obvious explanation is that people running “prepper” sites are eco-nutters who hate the idea of nuclear war. However, that makes it quite possible that they would have bought into the “Great reset” population annihilation cult. I therefore should keep my mind open to the possibility that we are being deliberately manipulated into nuclear war intended to “end humanity” (except the “chosen”). Open to the possibility, doesn’t mean it is happening, or is going to happen … it just means I should double check anything that might indicate whether such a cult is in action.

Although the end of the insane green was inevitable, that didn’t mean the non-science couldn’t continue longer than I could reasonably expect to live. However, that doesn’t seem to be a problem now, as there is every sign the green bubble is starting to burst.