New Study Emerges From 145 Countries Showing Increase of Death After COVID Vaccines Introduced

The scientific study, “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries,” finds that in the United States, COVID-19 vaccinations account for an increased transmission rate of 38% and a 31% increase in death rate.

The news could almost not be worse for the Biden administration and those who tote the mandatory vaccination line. Researches found that 89.84% of the 145 countries experienced a negative impact after COVID-19 vaccinations were made available. The study stated:

“Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.

y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].

y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.”

The groundbreaking study also found that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 (before vaccinations) experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced.

(link & coverage link)

My Comment

This paper, using readily available data, so easily replicated and no chance to hide it, shows an increase in deaths and the spread of covid due to the jabs. It therefore follows that the jab killed people and given that the evidence it was killing people would have been available to Fauci, Big Pharma and world “leaders”, the charge of murder seems to apply. Which given the number of deaths, makes a death sentence almost inevitable.

It’s a total game changer for the pro-freedom & pro-human-rights movement. Of course those who pushed the murderous forcing of lethal jabs on people will try to suppress it … what else can they do? … but short of changing history, they won’t be able to.

I now have growing confidence that not only have we seen the latest and every milder variant peak, but that the number of deaths or even severely ill people in the UK is going to be very small … the same level as a common cold and that it will be soon very obvious that there has been a stunning over-reaction to covid.

This epidemic is on the way out … and unless evolution reverses, all future epidemics are likely to be even milder … making covid soon a joke for over-reacting hypochondria like “you’ve got man-flu”.

Much less welcome, is the fact that we are seeing an increased death rate amongst working age people which is clearly due to the jab. Indeed, the deaths are so high, that despite the claims for the jab “saving people”, what appears to have happened is that the jab caused as many deaths as it “saved”, and, unfortunately, the effects of the jab are likely to last a lot longer than the threat of covid, meaning the jab will end up killing more people than it “saved”.

That is not a scandal that can be hushed up!!!

On the positive side, we haven’t seen any signs that suggest ADE is increasing deaths although it could be related to the above. However, at present the damage being done by the jabs appear to be slight … although obviously each case is an unnecessary death and should be investigated under domestic law as well as international law as a crime against humanity under the Nuremberg code.

The failures of the woke academics in SAGE

Let’s summarise the failures of the academics in SAGE, a bunch of arrogant morons who had absolutely no idea how to operate in an “emergency” and who as a result got almost everything entirely wrong.

The first and simplest thing is that in an emergency, you cannot afford to have myopic idiots who can’t see the bigger picture. So, when you do forecasts, the forecasts have to take account of all the impacts, which for covid was not just the injury and deaths from covid, but also the injuries and deaths and other social and economic damage from shutting down the NHS, shutting down the economy, the breaking of human rights, etc.

• In January, SAGE said the risk from covid was “VERY low”. Any risk analysis would have shown, that even if it was “very low” (which it clearly was not), the potential cost was enormous, so action should have started at that point and the risk should not have been “very low”.
• In February, having totally failed on the first forecast, they told the government “track and trace will stop it”. Because again they were totally incompetent fools as anyone who bothered to look at what was happening in China could see it was getting around attempts to stop it like a hot knife through butter
• In March (?), SAGE came up with a forecast that the epidemic would peak in June. This is because the idiots in SAGE were (and still are) obsessed with the fictional “R” number. That is a meaningless number, because without also knowing and monitoring the mean time between infections, R tells them nothing. But, there is no need to know R & the meantime between infections … because even a schoolboy plotting the epidemic no a long-time graph paper will see that it was following a straight line increasing by nearly 10x per week (not the 2x per week they told the PM). And, there was no way it wasn’t going to peak by the end of April, because by that time the whole country had to be infected. That was one of the most criminally incompetent forecasts ever!! Because it meant that the government believed they had about three months to prepare, when the reality, is that they may have had less than a month.
• Headless chicken lockup. At the beginning of April, it is clear the headless chicken academics stopped being totally complacent idiots, and started being headless chicken idiots. Because around that time they stopped saying there were months to go till the peak, and they started demanding a lockup. Unfortunately, that meant the lcokup occurred after the peak of infections, at a stage when the epidemic was already starting to subside.
• The brain dead: Because we did something and something happened, it must be that what we did caused it to happen. The whole of science is an attempt to stop the false attribution of cause and effect. It’s the most fundamental lesson good scientists learn probably at primary school. But not the braindead morons in SAGE. Having locked up the country too late to have any effect … they then attributed the drop in infections to what they had done and not as any scientist could have worked out … to the fact the epidemic peaked before the lockup.
• The Denial of sweden’s success. Fortunately for SAGE, despite having made a false attribution of the decline in the epidemic to their lockup, Sweden came along and showed what happened without a lockup … which was much the same epidemic curve as we had in the UK, showing that the lockup had no effect on the epidemic. That is the point that any scientist had to dismiss the idea the lockups had had any significant impact on the epidemic. But not the morons in SAGE … who then proceeding to do all they could to stop people hearing about Sweden.
• The illegal, criminal, Nazi, Pysops Nudge Unit. Science progresses one sceptical success at a time. So, any scientist welcomes critique of their work and therefore welcomes open honest free debate based on the facts. But not the Nazis in SAGE!! They wanted to force their hysterical non-science onto the people. The result is that they stirred up panic, fear and locked the UK into a hysterical delusional feedback loop …which is what Totalitarian regimes use to control the people, and which is why they so often commit appalling atrocities … as did the mass murder and crimes against humanity committed by SAGE.
• The death in care homes
  Whether indirectly, because SAGE told the government they had far more time and as a result there was a cockup, or whether SAGE directly advised about the mistreatment of the elderly: for example sending people with early more deadly variants of covid to care homes, SAGE killed a lot of elderly people. They also created a atmosphere of complete fear … with the result many elderly people died from simple neglect such as not getting treatment as basic as regular drinks of water. These deaths are directly the responsibility of the people in SAGE & particularly the evil people in the psyops nudge unit.
• The denial of working treatments
  I haven’t checked, but I suspect SAGE was also involved in some way, in the repression of viable treatments such as Vitamin D. YES … something as simple as giving people vitamin D would have reduced death rate. And, there were other possibilities like Ivermectin or HCQ … neither of which were accepted in the UK … until Big Pharma made their own variant and it suddenly became acceptable to treatment with Ivermectin (rebranded).
• The focus on the jab … which caused the jab to be used before it was properly tested. Which meant that safety was ignored, which also meant the focus remained on the illegal and ineffective lockup when it should have been on encouraging people, and particularly the NHS (& Schools) to return to normal.
• The culture of pushing the jab at all costs and hiding the lack of testing and the illnesses being caused… which meant that the true number of injuries and deaths was not properly reported by doctors … which meant the true horror was repressed until it was too late.
• The lack of cost benefit analysis … which meant they never considered the cost to the NHS of shutting it down, nor the cost to the economy, nor the cost to children, nor the cost to mental health, nor the moral cost of breaking the human rights of everyone, nor the profound change in ethics which leads up to Totalitarianism and the end of freedom. In short, SAGE was obsessed with the direct “cost of covid” … and unlike any professional person, who would look at the wider picture, these incompetent amateurs didn’t care less what their focus on covid was doing elsewhere.
• Always the worst case … so this winter, SAGE gave a worst case estimate of deaths which even just after the peak, we know was totally utterly completely wrong.

What did SAGE get right? Not a lot. The only time both me and SAGE got it wrong … was when they massively over estimated the epidemic last winter and I massively underestimated the epidemic … which is excusable on my part … because I had only one year’s experience and unlike SAGE I didn’t have access to all the data. Which when I was right and they were wrong on every other forecast …really does show what a total bunch of incompetent idiots they are.

The Academics have shown they are not competent to predict “crisis”.

The one thing that will come out of this appalling debacle, is that the academics are entirely the wrong people to be advising government on large scale crisis. They ignore the science, get panicked by nothing at all yet also fail to act when needed, and as a result they get everything wrong.

The public and certainly government are never ever going to trust them quite the same again! Their time lording it over us, on climate and now covid, are numbered! The woke forces are on the decline … society is now inoculated against woke.

There’s a point when battering down a door, when the woodwork is going, but the door is still closed. But, we can tell it is going to break open, because the door starts “giving”. That is starting to happen with covid. It’s almost becoming respectable to be a sceptic, indeed, it might even be in danger of becoming fashionable.

It is now more of a shock to find someone who is openly a lockup lover, than to find people who openly express their scepticism. Indeed, I’ve not heard any strong pro-lockup, pro mask wearing sentiments for a while. Yes, there are people who still argue that masks works, or argue that the jab works, but not with enthusiasm, but rather in the way a defence council will argue for a knowingly guilty man.

This isn’t quite how I imagined the ending. I assumed that the two options, were to fade out or go out with a bang. Instead, there is a strong surge toward the sceptics, but no sign of the bang. The other thing is that governments seem to have lost control of the narrative. It is as if the public have got immunity to their propaganda. That is interesting, because once gained, immunity to government propaganda is long lasting. And, more interesting, people are clearly gaining immunity to the black ops “tar the opposition as stupid” propaganda as well.

It’s too early to say how people are being impacted by this change, so it’s not possible to predict how things move from here. But if I were in the black ops or nudge units … I’d be trying to hide the evidence trail that links me to the appalling crimes. Indeed, best they prepare for a very long stay away from home.

Covid has now mutated to the point where it is just another cold … that is, about 100-200 people each day in the UK die within 28days of getting a cold, and guess what? About 100-200 people in the UK are now dying within 28days of getting covid and the average age is guess what? The same age as those who don’t die within 28 days of getting a cold/covid.

As importantly, the public mood is changing. There is a tangible growing distrust of what is happening amongst the public … who now know the measures are totally disproportionate.

And, that is why it’s about to get interesting. The climate scare has been going on for decades, and the flame of the hysteria has been kept burning, but whilst it often appeared to be dying, it never quite got to the stage we have got to with the covid scare. So, I’m unclear what happens next with these massive delusional events (particularly in the age of the internet censorship aka “brainwashing” which makes them much worse).

In the past, we’ve had such scares such as the “kids can’t be allowed to go into the sun” scare (yes honestly, in Scotland where we almost never see the sun, kids were being prevented from seeing what little sun there was … and the result was some literally developed rickets from lack of vitamin D). And, yes they did just fizzle out. But what is different about the climate and covid scares/scams, is that a lot of people have lost a lot of money and in the case of covid, there have been some extremely serious breaches of both international and UK law. These scams are not going to just fizzle out and die. They cannot “just be forgotten”. People have died as a result of the appalling forced jabbing of the population, and their relatives will not give us prosecuting those responsible when it all falls apart.

Of course … I already know I will be appalled by the money making scams and profiteering from victims that will occur after covid, so, I’m not exactly looking forward to it. But, whilst it seems inevitable that covid will end up in endless court cases with Johnson, Sturgeon et al going to jail, I still can’t quite envisage how that happens.  Does it all suddenly blow up? Does is slowly smoulder for many years eventually leading to the arrest and imprisonment of politicians which most people had forgotten existed? Do the press do a 180degree U-turn and start attacking the politicians for the very policies they were screaming at them to enforce?

But, whatever happens next, will show the likely fate of the global warming scam.

Under the Nuremberg code, International Human rights, the common law (for countries that inherited their law from England), it is illegal to force people to take an experimental therapy.

There is now no doubt the jab doesn’t stop the spread of covid, as if anything, in most age groups, those with the jab (in the UK) are more likely to test positive.

Now we have research showing the assertions about “saving lives” are totally BS.

(source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-data-shows-the-vaccines-are-not)

It is now, not just difficult to show that there is any benefit to the jab, it is impossible to show benefit whilst the breach of numerous serious law, treaties and international criminal law is unequivocal. There is now no doubt that politicians, those “health experts” and especially the pysops psychologists master-minding the mass Totalitarian propaganda that stirred it all up, will be going to jail.

I cannot vouch for this but it appears genuine: Greta is sinking “You can shove your climate crisis up your arse” for our US friends, that means “You can place your climate crisis where the sun don’t shine”.

The number of people who have gullibly gone along with the covid scam is astonishing. But even their gullibility is being strained by the lack of any benefit from the jabs as Big Pharma now roll out their latest money making scam of yearly boosters for a jab that doesn’t work.

What do I mean by “doesn’t work”. According the the 2019 definition of a vaccine … it produced immunity which stops people getting infected. By that definition, the jab has utterly failed as those over 30 are (slightly) more likely to test positive for covid.

Likewise, the death rate is also not on the jabs favour. The Indian variant in India showed 5% of the deaths per head of population compared to the UK variants in the UK. So, we would expect that without a jab, the Indian variant being so benign, would have around 5% of the deaths of the previous variants. What has been the result since we got both the jab and the Indian variant? The death rate is now 10% of what is was before the jab … or double what we would expect if we only had the Indian variant.

And that failure to reduce deaths was clearly visible in the Spring when those age groups who had got the jab showed no reduction in excess deaths compared to other age groups. Nor did they finish the epidemic earlier “due to” the jab.

I grant that we might expect undercounting of deaths in India, but even so, a doubling of the death rate in the UK is not evidence of success. However, it would be difficult to say it proves the jab is increasing covid deaths. On balance the null hypothesis (no significant effect) wins.

However, the “null hypothesis” of no effect is what we can say of the supposed benefit of the jab. But, when we start accounting for all the deaths and injuries already caused by the jab … and then factor in the unknown quantity of the number of deaths and long term illness caused by the jab, it becomes a no brainer that the jab was an appalling thing, for almost all people (I might be convinced of a benefit for those who had serious conditions which made them particularly vulnerable to covid, and who had a very short life-expectancy).

Now, I grant that the above needs a bit of knowledge and research … especially when the media still lie about the “effectiveness” of the jab. But people were let to believe by the UK government vile psyops nudge unit, that the jab would be the end of the abuses of human rights and lead to a prompt return to normal.

It does not take any maths to know that was a blatant lie.

Likewise the lockup. A leaked memo revealed that the UK governments own estimate of the “success” of the lockup was that it reduced deaths by 5%. If we assume 120,000 deaths that is 6000 lives “saved”. The cost of the lockup was, according to UK government, in excess of £300billion. That makes the cost per life £50million. But with an average age of death of 83 (higher than normal) and with almost all having multiple conditions the best we figure we could use of their life expectancy is 10 years (but that is very high as in reality it could be less than a year). So, the average cost per year of life “saved” was £5million. Which is  200x the maximum permitable cost of treatment in the NHS. Or to put it another way, for each year of covid life “saved”, we could have saved more than 200 years of life simply by having no lockup and putting the money into the NHS. Or to put it another way, if we had put a mere £1.5billion into the NHS and no lockup, we would have saved more lives (note we are now having to put in far more than that 1.5billion into the NHS to clear up the mess from the lockup)

And this appalling cost of the lockup … is before we start to factor in all the deaths caused by lockup. And when even lack of cancer treatment is predicted to cause 30,000 deaths, it is not difficult to see the death rate from the lockup far exceeds any suggested “saving”.

Peak Sheeple

if the jab had actually worked … people might have believed that the insane lockup was “worth it” … despite the economic insanity. If the lockup has worked to reduce deaths massively, then people wouldn’t have minded that the jab was an utter failure. But we now have a jab that is a failure and a lockup that completely failed to work.

And, worse for the vile people who broke international law and forced experimental medication on people, and those who broke the law of the UK and illegally detained millions of people in direct contravention of common law, Magna Carta and human rights, the sheeple are beginning to wake up.

I think it’s the realisation that this booster jab … means that there is no end … that no matter how much they go along with the profit making schemes of Big Pharma, that those loathsome “drug dealers” will always be demanding they pay for yet one more “fix” … and like all drug dealers, it will never end and it was all entirely utterly pointless.

Just seen a video on the North Atlantic Oscillation, and for the first time I’ve got an idea about a potential mechanism that transitions us into the ice-age. More important, this gives an idea of the timing … a few decades … indeed perhaps as long as a century before the ice-age “latches in”. In other words, we could experience conditions suggesting we are heading to another ice-age for a decade, and then return to the inter-glacial.

Still very tentative, but it’s starting to go together.

In short: I don’t have a clue what the figures mean for future covid.

However, it is now clear the jab has been a total failure … it does nothing to stop the spread of covid, indeed if anything those with the jab are more likely to spread it, and if it does reduce deaths, the jab is as likely to increase deaths both immediately after taking the jab, and more worryingly long term.

So, basically, no fit and healthy person should be taking the jab … the risks outweigh the “benefits”. And, in an ideal world I’d tell people with serious conditions to talk to their GP … but GPs are now unobtainium.

But I only mention jabs, because the jabs are easy … the evidence is pretty clear they do not work to stop the spread of covid and are dangerous so only a very few people should even consider them.

But the covid stats … they just look like noise … loud noise, with a high level of positives. There is no longer any sign of “epidemics”, instead it’s just a continuous high level with massive fluctuations … which could have a long term trend up … but could just as easily turn to a long term downward trend. Is this the “lull” before the storm … or is this the dying waves after the event? Indeed, are the stats still real at all? Are they just being made up? Are we being fed total lies …. and if so, is this to hide what is happening or to hide what could happen … or to manufacture more profit for BIG PHARMA by keeping the scare going … or to normalise covid to make the panic go away.

Antibody Dependent Enhancement

The only thing that can be said for sure … is that we know people have begun to lose immunity, so now, the longer we don’t hear anything that clearly shows ADE is happening, the less chance there is that ADE will occur.

However, it is also true, that I haven’t seen anything to suggest ADE will not occur. Indeed, the more bizarre the stats, the more concerned I am, that in some way that I do not understand, the stats indicates that ADE is occurring.

And note: this is also the argument “for” global warming. They don’t understand the weather stats or “trends”, so the stats “must” indicate what they fear.

But, also note, like global warming … the stats get changed to suit whatever the agenda of those in control of the stats have. And, the bizarre behaviour of the “stats” may simply be indicative of meddling in the stats.